Comparison of culture, polymerase chain reaction, and fluorescent in situ hybridization for detection of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and "Brachyspira hampsonii" in pig feces

被引:10
|
作者
Wilberts, Bailey L. [1 ]
Warneke, Hallie L. [2 ]
Bower, Leslie P. [2 ]
Kinyon, Joann M. [2 ]
Burrough, Eric R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Vet Pathol, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Vet Diagnost & Prod Anim Med, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
Brachyspira; fluorescent in situ hybridization; swine dysentery; TREPONEMA-HYODYSENTERIAE; SELECTIVE MEDIUM; SWINE; SPP;
D O I
10.1177/1040638714563064
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Swine dysentery is characterized by mucohemorrhagic diarrhea and can occur following infection by Brachyspira hyodysenteriae or Brachyspira hampsonii. A definitive diagnosis is often based on the isolation of strongly beta-hemolytic spirochetes from selective culture or by the application of species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays directly to feces. While culture is highly sensitive, it typically requires 6 or more days to complete, and PCR, although rapid, can be limited by fecal inhibition. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has been described in formalin-fixed tissues; however, completion requires approximately 2 days. Because of the time constraints of available assays, a same-day FISH assay was developed to detect B. hyodysenteriae and B. hampsonii in pig feces using previously described oligonucleotide probes Hyo1210 and Hamp1210 for B. hyodysenteriae and B. hampsonii, respectively. In situ hybridization was simultaneously compared with culture and PCR on feces spiked with progressive dilutions of spirochetes to determine the threshold of detection for each assay at 0 and 48 hr. The PCR assay on fresh feces and FISH on formalin-fixed feces had similar levels of detection. Culture was the most sensitive method, detecting the target spirochetes at least 2 log-dilutions less when compared to other assays 48 hr after sample preparation. Fluorescent in situ hybridization also effectively detected both target species in formalin-fixed feces from inoculated pigs as part of a previous experiment. Accordingly, FISH on formalin-fixed feces from clinically affected pigs can provide same-day identification and preliminary speciation of spirochetes associated with swine dysentery in North America.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 46
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of polymerase chain reaction methods, in situ hybridization, and enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in atherosclerotic carotid plaques
    Lajunen, Taina
    Vikatmaa, Pirkka
    Ikonen, Tuija
    Lepantalo, Mauri
    Lounatmaa, Kari
    Sormunen, Raija
    Rantala, Aino
    Leinonen, Maija
    Saikku, Pekka
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2008, 61 (02) : 156 - 164
  • [22] The fluorescent in situ hybridization test in comparison with culture for detection of Legionella pneumophila in water samples
    Wullings, B
    Voogt, R
    Veenendaal, H
    van der Kooij, D
    LEGIONELLA, 2002, : 263 - 266
  • [23] A comparison of fluorescent in situ hybridization and multiplex short tandem repeat polymerase chain reaction for quantifying chimerism after stem cell transplantation
    Buno, Ismael
    Nava, Paola
    Simon, Ainhoa
    Gonzalez-Rivera, Milagros
    Luis Jimenez, Jose
    Balsalobre, Pascual
    Serrano, David
    Carrion, Rafael
    Gomez-Pineda, Alfonso
    Luis Diez-Martin, Jose
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2005, 90 (10) : 1373 - 1379
  • [24] Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi with the polymerase chain reaction and in situ hybridization in infected murine cardiac tissue
    Lane, JE
    OlivaresVillagomez, D
    VnencakJones, CL
    McCurley, TL
    Carter, CE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1997, 56 (06): : 588 - 595
  • [25] Detection of Epstein-Barr virus by in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction in gastric carcinoma
    Kim, Ho Young
    Lee, Jong In
    Shim, Kwang Yong
    Cho, Mee Yon
    Song, Ji Sun
    Seong, Seung Hoon
    Kim, Jung Han
    Song, Hun Ho
    Roh, Jae Kyung
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 : 312 - 312
  • [26] Detection of Epstein-Barr virus in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction
    Murono, S
    Yoshizaki, T
    Tanaka, S
    Takeshita, H
    Park, CS
    Furukawa, M
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1997, 107 (04): : 523 - 526
  • [27] Comparison of light microscopy, in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction for detection of human papillomavirus in histological tissue of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Lie, AK
    Skjeldestad, FE
    Hagen, B
    Johannessen, E
    Skarsvag, S
    Haugen, OA
    APMIS, 1997, 105 (02) : 115 - 120
  • [28] Detection of campylobacter species: a comparison of culture and polymerase chain reaction based methods
    Kulkarni, SP
    Lever, S
    Logan, JMJ
    Lawson, AJ
    Stanley, J
    Shafi, MS
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (10) : 749 - 753
  • [29] COMPARISON OF POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION TESTS AND FECAL CULTURE FOR DETECTING MYCOBACTERIUM-PARATUBERCULOSIS IN BOVINE FECES
    COLLINS, DM
    STEPHENS, DM
    DELISLE, GW
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 36 (3-4) : 289 - 299