Comparison of culture, polymerase chain reaction, and fluorescent in situ hybridization for detection of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and "Brachyspira hampsonii" in pig feces

被引:10
|
作者
Wilberts, Bailey L. [1 ]
Warneke, Hallie L. [2 ]
Bower, Leslie P. [2 ]
Kinyon, Joann M. [2 ]
Burrough, Eric R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Vet Pathol, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Vet Diagnost & Prod Anim Med, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
Brachyspira; fluorescent in situ hybridization; swine dysentery; TREPONEMA-HYODYSENTERIAE; SELECTIVE MEDIUM; SWINE; SPP;
D O I
10.1177/1040638714563064
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Swine dysentery is characterized by mucohemorrhagic diarrhea and can occur following infection by Brachyspira hyodysenteriae or Brachyspira hampsonii. A definitive diagnosis is often based on the isolation of strongly beta-hemolytic spirochetes from selective culture or by the application of species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays directly to feces. While culture is highly sensitive, it typically requires 6 or more days to complete, and PCR, although rapid, can be limited by fecal inhibition. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has been described in formalin-fixed tissues; however, completion requires approximately 2 days. Because of the time constraints of available assays, a same-day FISH assay was developed to detect B. hyodysenteriae and B. hampsonii in pig feces using previously described oligonucleotide probes Hyo1210 and Hamp1210 for B. hyodysenteriae and B. hampsonii, respectively. In situ hybridization was simultaneously compared with culture and PCR on feces spiked with progressive dilutions of spirochetes to determine the threshold of detection for each assay at 0 and 48 hr. The PCR assay on fresh feces and FISH on formalin-fixed feces had similar levels of detection. Culture was the most sensitive method, detecting the target spirochetes at least 2 log-dilutions less when compared to other assays 48 hr after sample preparation. Fluorescent in situ hybridization also effectively detected both target species in formalin-fixed feces from inoculated pigs as part of a previous experiment. Accordingly, FISH on formalin-fixed feces from clinically affected pigs can provide same-day identification and preliminary speciation of spirochetes associated with swine dysentery in North America.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 46
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fluorescent in situ hybridization for detection of "Brachyspira hampsonii" in porcine colonic tissues
    Burrough, Eric R.
    Wilberts, Bailey L.
    Bower, Leslie P.
    Jergens, Albert E.
    Schwartz, Kent J.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2013, 25 (03) : 407 - 412
  • [2] Development of a duplex PCR assay for detection of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Brachyspira pilosicoli in pig feces
    La, T
    Phillips, ND
    Hampson, DJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (07) : 3372 - 3375
  • [3] Comparison of culture and biochemical tests with PCR for detection of Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Brachyspira pilosicoli
    Råsbäck, T.
    Fellström, C.
    Gunnarsson, A.
    Aspan, A.
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2006, 66 (02) : 347 - 353
  • [4] Comparison of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of residual neuroblastoma cells
    Eckschlager, T
    McClain, K
    NEOPLASMA, 1996, 43 (05) : 301 - 303
  • [5] Salmonellae in Fish Feces Analyzed by In Situ Hybridization and Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
    Sha, Qiong
    Forstner, Michael R. J.
    Bonner, Timothy H.
    Hahn, Dittmar
    JOURNAL OF AQUATIC ANIMAL HEALTH, 2013, 25 (03) : 184 - 190
  • [6] Detection of human papillomavirus in archival tissues: Comparison of in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction
    Unger, ER
    Vernon, SD
    Lee, DR
    Miller, DL
    Reeves, WC
    JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 46 (04) : 535 - 540
  • [7] Nested polymerase chain reaction and in situ hybridization for detection of nucleopolyhedrosis
    Wang, CH
    Yang, HN
    Liu, HC
    Kou, GH
    Lo, CF
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2000, 84 (01) : 65 - 75
  • [8] Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and microbiological culture for detection of salmonellae in equine feces and environmental samples
    Cohen, ND
    Martin, LJ
    Simpson, RB
    Wallis, DE
    Neibergs, HL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 1996, 57 (06) : 780 - 786
  • [9] A Comparison of Candida Detection in Sputum by the Conventional Culture and Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods
    Xu, Xiaoqun
    Lv, Huoyang
    Zhang, Fengwei
    Zhu, Houyong
    Cai, Long
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2021, 27
  • [10] Human papillomavirus detection by non isotopic in situ hybridization, in situ hybridization with signal amplification and in situ Polymerase Chain Reaction
    Bettinger, D
    Bernard, B
    Riethmuller, D
    Greslin, I
    Gay, C
    Lab, M
    Seillès, E
    Mougin, C
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 43 (03): : 185 - 198