Measuring physical activity in children: A comparison of four different methods

被引:15
|
作者
O'Connor, J [1 ]
Ball, EJ
Steinbeck, KS
Davies, PSW
Wishart, C
Gaskin, KJ
Baur, LA
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Discipline Paediat & Child Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Childrens Hosp Westmead, James Fairfax Inst Paediat Nutr, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1123/pes.15.2.202
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The aim of this study of 56 children aged 6-9 years was to identify measures of physical activity that could be used in either clinical or population studies. Comparisons were made between four measures of physical activity: a three day parent-reported activity diary, a parent-reported physical activity questionnaire, the Tritrac-R3D(TM) accelerometer (worn three days) and physical activity energy expenditure calculated over 10 days by the doubly labeled water (DLW) technique. The strongest correlation between methods was for the diary and Tritrac-R3D(TM) during the two hour after-school period (1530-1730 hours) (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). Activity level in this after-school period was positively correlated with average activity level over three days for both Tritrac-R3D(TM) (r = 0.53, P < 0.01) and diary (r = 0.54, P < 0.0001). No associations were found between measures of activity from DLW and activity measures from the Tritrac-R3D(TM), diary or questionnaire. These results suggest that the two hour after-school period is of high interest for future population studies of physical activity in school-age children.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 215
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity
    Ainsworth, BE
    Bassett, DR
    Strath, SJ
    Swartz, AM
    O'Brien, WL
    Thompson, RW
    Jones, DA
    Macera, CA
    Kimsey, CD
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2000, 32 (09): : S457 - S464
  • [2] Comparison of three different methods for measuring classical pathway complement activity
    Jaskowski, TD
    Martins, TB
    Litwin, CM
    Hill, HR
    CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY, 1999, 6 (01) : 137 - 139
  • [3] Trypsin activity measurement in fish and mammals: Comparison of four different methods
    Lemieux, H.
    Blier, P. U.
    JOURNAL OF AQUATIC FOOD PRODUCT TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 16 (04) : 13 - 26
  • [4] Comparison of four methods for measuring total suction
    Agus, SS
    Schanz, T
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2005, 4 (04) : 1087 - 1095
  • [5] Comparison of Four Different ppm-Level Methods for Traceability of HVDC Measuring Systems
    Meisner, J.
    Passon, S.
    Elg, A-P
    Koenig, K.
    Kraemer, J.
    Noertershaeuser, W.
    Rest
    Weinheimer, C.
    Winzen, D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH VOLTAGE ENGINEERING, VOL 2, 2020, 599 : 718 - 726
  • [6] DIFFERENT METHODS OF MEASURING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN CYSTIC FIBROSIS: NEW ELECTRONIC DEVICES
    Savi, D.
    Graziano, L.
    Giordani, B.
    Schiavetto, S.
    Asciutti, D.
    Rivolta, M.
    Palange, P.
    Simmonds, N.
    Elborn, J.
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2019, 54 : S388 - S388
  • [7] Agreement between Four Different Methods Assessing Physical Activity or Cardiorespiratory Fitness
    Maslow, Andrea L.
    Bottai, Matteo
    Hooker, Steven P.
    Blair, Steven N.
    Colabianchi, Natalie
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2011, 43 (05): : 609 - 609
  • [8] Agreement between Four Different Methods Assessing Physical Activity or Cardiorespiratory Fitness
    Maslow, Andrea L.
    Bottai, Matteo
    Hooker, Steven P.
    Blair, Steven N.
    Colabianchi, Natalie
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 : 609 - 609
  • [9] Comparison of two methods of measuring physical activity South African older adults
    Kolbe-Alexander, TL
    Lambert, EV
    Harkins, JB
    Ekelund, U
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2006, 14 (01) : 98 - 114
  • [10] A comparison of four methods to classify physical activity for epidemiological studies of osteoarthritis.
    Hootman, JM
    Helmick, CG
    Macera, CA
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2001, 44 (09): : S210 - S210