Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program

被引:199
|
作者
Palencia, Laia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Espelt, Albert [1 ,2 ]
Rodriguez-Sanz, Maica [1 ,2 ]
Puigpinos, Rosa [1 ,2 ]
Pons-Vigues, Mariona [1 ,2 ]
Isabel Pasarin, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Spadea, Teresa [4 ]
Kunst, Anton E. [5 ]
Borrell, Carme [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Agencia Salut Publ Barcelona, Barcelona 08023, Spain
[2] CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Dept Expt & Hlth Sci, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Reg Epidemiol Unit, Grugliasco, Italy
[5] Univ Amsterdam, AMC, Dept Publ Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Socio-economic factors; mass screening; breast neoplasm; uterine cervical neoplasm; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1093/ije/dyq003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Methods A cross-sectional study was performed using individual-level data from the WHO World Health Survey (2002) and data regarding the implementation of cancer screening programmes. The study population consisted of women from 22 European countries, aged 25-69 years for cervical cancer screening (n =11 770) and 50-69 years for breast cancer screening (n = 4784). Dependent variables were having had a PAP smear and having had a mammography during the previous 3 years. The main independent variables were socio-economic position (SEP) and the type of screening program in the country. For each country the prevalence of screening was calculated, overall and for each level of education, and indices of relative (RII) and absolute (SII) inequality were computed by educational level. Multilevel logistic regression models were fitted. Results SEP inequalities in screening were found in countries with opportunistic screening [comparing highest with lowest educational level: RII = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.48 for cervical cancer; and RII = 3.11, 95% CI 1.78-5.42 for breast cancer] but not in countries with nationwide population-based programmes. Inequalities were also observed in countries with regional screening programs (RII = 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.65 for cervical cancer; and RII = 1.58, 95% CI 1.26-1.98 for breast cancer). Conclusions Inequalities in the use of cancer screening according to SEP are higher in countries without population-based cancer screening programmes. These results highlight the potential benefits of population-based screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 765
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening among urban Mexican women
    Couture, Marie-Claude
    Nguyen, Cat Tuong
    Alvarado, Beatriz Eugenia
    Delia Velasquez, Luz
    Zunzunegui, Maria-Victoria
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 47 (05) : 471 - 476
  • [42] Socio-economic aspects of extended STD screening in pregnancy
    Postma, MJ
    Jager, JC
    de Jong-van den berg, LTW
    AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 2000, 12 (06): : 731 - 735
  • [43] Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review
    Woods, LM
    Rachet, B
    Coleman, MP
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (01) : 5 - 19
  • [44] A multicultural and multilingual outreach program for cervical and breast cancer screening
    Giarratano, G
    Bustamante-Forest, R
    Carter, C
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2005, 34 (03): : 395 - 402
  • [45] Widening socio-economic inequalities in oral cancer in Scotland
    Conway, D.
    Brewster, D.
    McKinney, P.
    Stark, J.
    McMahon, A.
    Macpherson, L.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, : 76 - 76
  • [46] Inequalities in cervical cancer screening in Eastern Europe: perspectives from Bulgaria and Romania
    Todorova, Irina
    Baban, Adriana
    Alexandrova-Karamanova, Anna
    Bradley, Janet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 54 (04) : 222 - 232
  • [47] Are socio-economic inequalities in breast cancer survival explained by peri-diagnostic factors?
    Woods, Laura M.
    Rachet, Bernard
    Morris, Melanie
    Bhaskaran, Krishnan
    Coleman, Michel P.
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [48] Screening for cervical and breast cancer
    Wilm, J.
    Schueler-Toprak, S.
    Ortmann, O.
    GYNAKOLOGE, 2016, 49 (07): : 535 - 547
  • [49] Screening for cervical and breast cancer
    Wilm, J.
    Schueler-Toprak, S.
    Ortmann, O.
    PATHOLOGE, 2016, 37 (05): : 477 - 487
  • [50] Are socio-economic inequalities in breast cancer survival explained by peri-diagnostic factors?
    Laura M. Woods
    Bernard Rachet
    Melanie Morris
    Krishnan Bhaskaran
    Michel P. Coleman
    BMC Cancer, 21