Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program

被引:199
|
作者
Palencia, Laia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Espelt, Albert [1 ,2 ]
Rodriguez-Sanz, Maica [1 ,2 ]
Puigpinos, Rosa [1 ,2 ]
Pons-Vigues, Mariona [1 ,2 ]
Isabel Pasarin, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Spadea, Teresa [4 ]
Kunst, Anton E. [5 ]
Borrell, Carme [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Agencia Salut Publ Barcelona, Barcelona 08023, Spain
[2] CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Dept Expt & Hlth Sci, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Reg Epidemiol Unit, Grugliasco, Italy
[5] Univ Amsterdam, AMC, Dept Publ Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Socio-economic factors; mass screening; breast neoplasm; uterine cervical neoplasm; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1093/ije/dyq003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Methods A cross-sectional study was performed using individual-level data from the WHO World Health Survey (2002) and data regarding the implementation of cancer screening programmes. The study population consisted of women from 22 European countries, aged 25-69 years for cervical cancer screening (n =11 770) and 50-69 years for breast cancer screening (n = 4784). Dependent variables were having had a PAP smear and having had a mammography during the previous 3 years. The main independent variables were socio-economic position (SEP) and the type of screening program in the country. For each country the prevalence of screening was calculated, overall and for each level of education, and indices of relative (RII) and absolute (SII) inequality were computed by educational level. Multilevel logistic regression models were fitted. Results SEP inequalities in screening were found in countries with opportunistic screening [comparing highest with lowest educational level: RII = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.48 for cervical cancer; and RII = 3.11, 95% CI 1.78-5.42 for breast cancer] but not in countries with nationwide population-based programmes. Inequalities were also observed in countries with regional screening programs (RII = 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.65 for cervical cancer; and RII = 1.58, 95% CI 1.26-1.98 for breast cancer). Conclusions Inequalities in the use of cancer screening according to SEP are higher in countries without population-based cancer screening programmes. These results highlight the potential benefits of population-based screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 765
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mass media campaign improves cervical screening across all socio-economic groups
    Anderson, Jenny O.
    Mullins, Robyn M.
    Siahpush, Mohammad
    Spittal, Matthew J.
    Wakefield, Melanie
    HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2009, 24 (05) : 867 - 875
  • [32] Understanding influences of cervical screening attendance among women of low socio-economic position
    Symmons, S. Mulcahy
    Drury, A.
    De Brun, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 34
  • [33] Variation in cervical cancer screening by region, socio-economic, migrant and Indigenous status in women in New South Wales
    Wain, G
    Morrell, S
    Taylor, R
    Mamoon, H
    Bodkin, N
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 41 (03): : 320 - 325
  • [34] Provider Attitudes and Screening Practices Following Changes in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines
    Jennifer S. Haas
    Brian L. Sprague
    Carrie N. Klabunde
    Anna N. A. Tosteson
    Jane S. Chen
    Asaf Bitton
    Elisabeth F. Beaber
    Tracy Onega
    Jane J. Kim
    Charles D. MacLean
    Kimberly Harris
    Phillip Yamartino
    Kathleen Howe
    Loretta Pearson
    Sarah Feldman
    Phyllis Brawarsky
    Marilyn M. Schapira
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2016, 31 : 52 - 59
  • [35] Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the "My Personal Breast Screening" (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial
    Roux, Alexandra
    Cholerton, Rachel
    Sicsic, Jonathan
    Moumjid, Nora
    French, David P.
    Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Guindy, Michal
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    Burrion, Jean-Benoit
    Castells, Xavier
    Ritchie, David
    Keatley, Debbie
    Baron, Camille
    Delaloge, Suzette
    de Montgolfier, Sandrine
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [36] Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the “My Personal Breast Screening” (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial
    Alexandra Roux
    Rachel Cholerton
    Jonathan Sicsic
    Nora Moumjid
    David P. French
    Paolo Giorgi Rossi
    Corinne Balleyguier
    Michal Guindy
    Fiona J. Gilbert
    Jean-Benoit Burrion
    Xavier Castells
    David Ritchie
    Debbie Keatley
    Camille Baron
    Suzette Delaloge
    Sandrine de Montgolfier
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [37] Provider Attitudes and Screening Practices Following Changes in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Klabunde, Carrie N.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Chen, Jane S.
    Bitton, Asaf
    Beaber, Elisabeth F.
    Onega, Tracy
    Kim, Jane J.
    MacLean, Charles D.
    Harris, Kimberly
    Yamartino, Phillip
    Howe, Kathleen
    Pearson, Loretta
    Feldman, Sarah
    Brawarsky, Phyllis
    Schapira, Marilyn M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (01) : 52 - 59
  • [38] Influence of socio-economic health determinants on participation in screening programs in Gorenjs']jska
    Hafner, A.
    Zupan, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 28 : 459 - 459
  • [39] A lifecourse perspective on socio-economic inequalities in health: the influence of childhood socio-economic conditions and selection processes
    van de Mheen, HD
    Stronks, K
    Mackenbach, JP
    SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 1998, 20 (05) : 754 - 777
  • [40] THE RELATIONSHIP OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND RACIAL FACTORS TO CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX AS INDICATED BY A MASS SCREENING PROGRAM
    SPRUNT, DH
    BERTON, WM
    ACTA UNIO INTERNATIONALIS CONTRA CANCRUM, 1960, 16 (07) : 1768 - 1770