Market segmentation analysis for airport access mode choice modeling with mixed logit

被引:15
|
作者
Gunay, Gurkan [1 ]
Gokasar, Ilgin [2 ]
机构
[1] Dogus Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Bogazici Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Mixed logit; Market segmentation; Airport access; Discrete choice; Air transportation; GROUND ACCESS; AIR-TRAVEL; HETEROGENEITY; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.102001
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Accessing airports can be considered as a crucial issue since passengers need not miss their flights. This issue makes the mode choice to access the airports important to study on and develop policies regarding it. Many studies show destination type as domestic or international affects the airport access mode choice, along with other factors. In this study, we investigate the effect of destination type of mode choice using mixed logit, using market segmentation approach. Market segmentation regarding destination type as domestic or international is a first in airport access mode choice modeling. Revealed-preference data was collected by face-to-face passenger surveys at Ataturk International Airport in Istanbul, Turkey, in 2015. We did market segmentation analysis for Multinomial Logit (MNL) and Mixed Logit (ML) models. When MNL and ML models were compared, it was observed that ML was superior to MNL. Further, results of market segmentation analysis revealed that using segmented models produced more accurate results than using the pooled model; both in MNL and ML. This finding was also supported by the value of time estimates; there were significant differences between domestic and international travel markets in terms of airport access mode choice. These results showed that different transportation policies may be introduced for domestic and international traveler segments, which also were explained.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Attitudinal market segmentation approach to mode choice and ridership forecasting - Structural equation modeling
    Outwater, ML
    Castleberry, S
    Shiftan, Y
    Ben-Akiva, M
    Zhou, YS
    Kuppam, A
    TRAVELER BEHAVIOR AND VALUES 2003: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION, 2003, (1854): : 32 - 42
  • [22] Access mode choice for relocated airports: the new Athens International Airport
    Psaraki, V
    Abacoumkin, C
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2002, 8 (02) : 89 - 98
  • [23] Airport, airline and access mode choice in the San Francisco Bay area
    Hess, Stephane
    Polak, John W.
    PAPERS IN REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2006, 85 (04) : 543 - 567
  • [24] Exploring characteristics of airport access mode choice: a case study of Korea
    Choo, Sangho
    You, Soyoung
    Lee, Hyangsook
    TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 36 (04) : 335 - 351
  • [25] Factors affecting airport access mode choice for elderly air passengers
    Chang, Yu-Chun
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2013, 57 : 105 - 112
  • [26] HOUSING CHOICE IN A REGULATED MARKET - A NESTED MULTINOMIAL LOGIT ANALYSIS
    FISCHER, MM
    AUFHAUSER, E
    GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 1988, 20 (01) : 47 - 69
  • [27] Assessing airport ground access interventions: An integrated approach combining mode choice modeling and microscopic traffic simulation
    Avogadro, Nicola
    Birolini, Sebastian
    Redondi, Renato
    Deforza, Paolo
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2024, 148 : 154 - 167
  • [28] Mixed Logit model for understanding travel mode choice behavior of megalopolitan residents
    Luan X.
    Deng W.
    Cheng L.
    Chen X.-Y.
    Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Gongxueban)/Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48 (04): : 1029 - 1036
  • [29] A study on Airport Access Mode Choice behavior using Mobile data - case of Incheon International Airport
    Kim, Eunji
    Lee, Juhwan
    Shin, Yejin
    Baik, Hojong
    2023 IEEE/AIAA 42ND DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, DASC, 2023,
  • [30] Performance Analysis of Mixed Logit Models for Discrete Choice Models
    Nugraha, Jaka
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS AND OPERATION RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (03) : 563 - 575