Exploring the reporting standards of RCTs involving invasive procedures for assisted vaginal birth: A systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Hotton, Emily J. [1 ,2 ]
Renwick, Sophie [2 ]
Lenguerrand, Erik [1 ,2 ]
Wade, Julia [3 ]
Draycott, Tim J. [2 ]
Crofts, Joanna F. [2 ]
Blencowe, Natalie S. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Translat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hosp, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Surg Res Ctr, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol, Avon, England
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Reporting standards; Complex interventions; Assisted vaginal birth; Ventouse; Forceps; Odon Device; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; VACUUM EXTRACTION; CONSORT STATEMENT; MEDICAL DEVICES; KIWI OMNICUP; DELIVERY; FORCEPS; INTERVENTION; CUP; EXTENSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.026
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Assisted vaginal birth (AVB) is a complex intervention involving medical devices, comprising multiple components. This complexity creates difficulties when designing and conducting randomised controlled trials (RCTs), in terms of describing, standardising and monitoring the intervention, and accounting for differing clinician expertise. This review examines the reporting standards of complex interventions involving a medical device, in the context of AVB RCTs. Study design: Searches were undertaken from the start of indexing to March 2021, and limited to RCTs, feasibility and pilot studies including at least one device for AVB. RCTs were selected if they included participants having an AVB with any device, with or without a comparator group. Reporting details were assessed according to the Consolidating Standards of Reporting Trials extension for non-pharmacological treatments (CONSORT-NPT), focusing on intervention descriptions, standardization, adherence and clinician expertise. Screening of abstracts, full-text articles and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Results: Of 4098 abstracts and 83 full-text articles, 39 papers were included, investigating 80 interventions. Twenty-seven different named devices were identified. Intervention descriptions were provided in 20 (55%) papers with varying levels of detail and with only one covering the entire procedure. Standardization of interventions was mentioned in 25 papers (64%). Only eight (21%) papers reported any form of adherence to the intended procedure. Some data regarding expertise were reported in 25 (64%) papers. Conclusions: Despite some compliance with reporting standards, there is a lack of detail regarding intervention description, standardization, adherence and expertise in RCTs of AVB. This creates difficulties in understanding how intervention delivery was intended and what actually occurred. Clearer guidelines for the reporting of invasive procedures and devices are required. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 173
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Women's, partners' and healthcare providers' views and experiences of assisted vaginal birth: a systematic mixed methods review
    Crossland, Nicola
    Kingdon, Carol
    Balaam, Marie-Clare
    Betran, Ana Pilar
    Downe, Soo
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [22] Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension
    Hodkinson, Alex
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    Tudur-Smith, Catrin
    Gamble, Carrol
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (09):
  • [23] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ADHERENCE TO RCTS INVOLVING PHYSICAL ACTIVITY INTERVENTIONS TARGETING THREE CHRONIC DISEASES
    Mullen, Sean P.
    Bullard, Tiffany
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 51 : S1280 - S1280
  • [24] A systematic review of the methodological quality and outcomes of RCTs to teach medical undergraduates surgical and emergency procedures
    Thomas, Roger E.
    Crutcher, Rodney
    Lorenzetti, Diane
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 50 (04) : 278 - 290
  • [25] Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Radical Hysterectomy: Systematic Review of the Literature
    Pergialiotis, Vassileios
    Rodolakis, Alexandros
    Christakis, Dimitrios
    Thomakos, Nikolaos
    Vlachos, Georgios
    Antsaklis, Aristides
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 20 (06) : 745 - 753
  • [26] Development of standards for reporting scaling studies of health interventions: a systematic review
    Gogovor, Amede
    Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon
    Ben Charif, Ali
    McLean, Robert
    Moher, David
    Milat, Andrew J.
    Wolfenden, Luke
    Prevost, Karina
    Aubin, Emmanuelle
    Rochon, Paula
    Ekanmian, Giraud
    Rheault, Nathalie
    Legare, France
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2023, 18
  • [27] A systematic review of the quality and reporting standards of longitudinal biomarker studies in dementia
    Flicker, L.
    Noel-Storr, A.
    Ritchie, C. W.
    McShane, R.
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2012, 31 : 18 - 18
  • [28] Spatulas for operative vaginal birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Grillo-Ardila, Carlos Fernando
    Paez-Castellanos, Edgar
    Bolanos-Palacios, Jesus Camilo
    Bautista-Charry, Alejandro Antonio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 156 (02) : 197 - 205
  • [29] Prediction models of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A systematic review
    Deng, Bo
    Li, Yan
    Chen, Jia-Yin
    Guo, Jun
    Tan, Jing
    Yang, Yang
    Liu, Ning
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2022, 135
  • [30] A Systematic Review of the Use of Routine Versus Selective Episiotomy for Vaginal Birth
    Alrida, Nour A.
    Ababneh, Amal
    Al-Sharif, Khawla
    Arabiat, Diana
    Alshraidah, Jafar
    Al-Zu'bi, Basheer
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)