Exploring the reporting standards of RCTs involving invasive procedures for assisted vaginal birth: A systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Hotton, Emily J. [1 ,2 ]
Renwick, Sophie [2 ]
Lenguerrand, Erik [1 ,2 ]
Wade, Julia [3 ]
Draycott, Tim J. [2 ]
Crofts, Joanna F. [2 ]
Blencowe, Natalie S. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Translat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hosp, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Surg Res Ctr, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[5] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol, Avon, England
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Reporting standards; Complex interventions; Assisted vaginal birth; Ventouse; Forceps; Odon Device; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; VACUUM EXTRACTION; CONSORT STATEMENT; MEDICAL DEVICES; KIWI OMNICUP; DELIVERY; FORCEPS; INTERVENTION; CUP; EXTENSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.026
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Assisted vaginal birth (AVB) is a complex intervention involving medical devices, comprising multiple components. This complexity creates difficulties when designing and conducting randomised controlled trials (RCTs), in terms of describing, standardising and monitoring the intervention, and accounting for differing clinician expertise. This review examines the reporting standards of complex interventions involving a medical device, in the context of AVB RCTs. Study design: Searches were undertaken from the start of indexing to March 2021, and limited to RCTs, feasibility and pilot studies including at least one device for AVB. RCTs were selected if they included participants having an AVB with any device, with or without a comparator group. Reporting details were assessed according to the Consolidating Standards of Reporting Trials extension for non-pharmacological treatments (CONSORT-NPT), focusing on intervention descriptions, standardization, adherence and clinician expertise. Screening of abstracts, full-text articles and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Results: Of 4098 abstracts and 83 full-text articles, 39 papers were included, investigating 80 interventions. Twenty-seven different named devices were identified. Intervention descriptions were provided in 20 (55%) papers with varying levels of detail and with only one covering the entire procedure. Standardization of interventions was mentioned in 25 papers (64%). Only eight (21%) papers reported any form of adherence to the intended procedure. Some data regarding expertise were reported in 25 (64%) papers. Conclusions: Despite some compliance with reporting standards, there is a lack of detail regarding intervention description, standardization, adherence and expertise in RCTs of AVB. This creates difficulties in understanding how intervention delivery was intended and what actually occurred. Clearer guidelines for the reporting of invasive procedures and devices are required. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 173
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A systematic review of robot-assisted minimally invasive gastrectomy to examine current global evidence and reporting standards according to IDEAL-stages
    Triemstra, Lianne
    den Boer, R. B.
    Grutters, J. P. C.
    Rovers, M. M.
    Hazenberg, Cevb C. E. V. B.
    van Hillegersberg, R.
    Ruurda, J. P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110
  • [12] Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in diabetes in Iran; a systematic review
    Gohari F.
    Baradaran H.R.
    Tabatabaee M.
    Anijidani S.
    Mohammadpour Touserkani F.
    Atlasi R.
    Razmgir M.
    [J]. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 15 (1):
  • [13] Reporting practices of pharmacodynamic studies involving invasive research procedures in cancer trials
    G A Freeman
    J Kimmelman
    J Dancey
    J G Monzon
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2013, 109 : 897 - 908
  • [14] Reporting practices of pharmacodynamic studies involving invasive research procedures in cancer trials
    Freeman, G. A.
    Kimmelman, J.
    Dancey, J.
    Monzon, J. G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 109 (04) : 897 - 908
  • [15] Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: A systematic review
    Guise, JM
    Berlin, M
    McDonagh, M
    Osterweil, P
    Chan, B
    Helfand, M
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (03): : 420 - 429
  • [16] Definitive Radiotherapy in Invasive Vaginal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review
    Guerri, Sara
    Perrone, Anna M.
    Buwenge, Milly
    Ferioli, Martina
    Macchia, Gabriella
    Tagliaferri, Luca
    Ferrandina, Gabriella
    Galuppi, Andrea
    Andrulli, Angela D.
    Frakulli, Rezarta
    Cammelli, Silvia
    Arcelli, Alessandra
    De Iaco, Pierandrea
    Morganti, Alessio G.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2019, 24 (01): : 132 - 141
  • [17] Vaginal Obliterative Procedures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review
    Buchsbaum, Gunhilde M.
    Lee, Toy Gee
    [J]. OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2017, 72 (03) : 175 - 183
  • [18] Examining the application of the IDEAL framework in the reporting and evaluation of innovative invasive procedures: secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review
    Richards, Hollie Sarah
    Cousins, Sian
    Scroggie, Darren L.
    Elliott, Daisy
    Macefield, Rhiannon
    Hudson, Elizabeth
    Mutanga, Ian Rodney
    Shah, Maximilian
    Alford, Natasha
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    Blazeby, Jane
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (05):
  • [19] Are Invasive Procedures Effective for Chronic Pain? A Systematic Review
    Jonas, Wayne B.
    Crawford, Cindy
    Colloca, Luana
    Kriston, Levente
    Linde, Klaus
    Moseley, Bruce
    Meissner, Karin
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (07) : 1281 - 1293
  • [20] Women’s, partners’ and healthcare providers’ views and experiences of assisted vaginal birth: a systematic mixed methods review
    Nicola Crossland
    Carol Kingdon
    Marie-Clare Balaam
    Ana Pilar Betrán
    Soo Downe
    [J]. Reproductive Health, 17