Part geometry and conduction-based laser power control for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

被引:78
|
作者
Yeung, Ho [1 ]
Lane, Brandon [1 ]
Fox, Jason [1 ]
机构
[1] NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
关键词
Additive manufacturing; Scan strategies; Laser power control; Overhanging structures; SITE-SPECIFIC CONTROL; OVERHANGING STRUCTURES; THERMAL-CONDUCTIVITY; SCAN STRATEGY; DESIGN; MICROSTRUCTURE; COMPONENTS; ROUGHNESS; ALUMINUM; ALLOYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.addma.2019.100844
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) uses a focused, high power laser to repeatedly scan geometric patterns on thin layers of metal powder, which build up to a final, solid three-dimensional (3D) part. This process is somewhat limited in that the parts tend to have poorer surface finish (compared to machining or grinding) and distortion due to residual stress, as well as multiple other deficiencies. Typical laser scan strategies are relatively simple and use constant laser power levels. This elicits local variations in the melt pool size, shape, or temperature, particularly near sharp geometric features or overhang structures due to the relatively higher thermal conductivity of solid metal compared to metal powder. In this paper, we present a new laser power control algorithm, which scales the laser power to a value called the geometric conductance factor (GCF). The GCF is calculated based on the amount of solid vs. powder material near the melt pool. The algorithm for calculating GCF is presented along with some basic examples for clarification. Then, we detail the hardware and software implementation on the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) additive manufacturing metrology testbed (AMMT), which includes co-axial melt pool monitoring using a high-speed camera. Six parts were fabricated out of nickel superalloy 625 (IN625) with the same nominal laser power, but with varying GCF algorithm parameters. We demonstrate the effect of tailored laser power on reducing the variability of melt pool intensity measured throughout the 3D build. Finally, we contrast the difference between the 'optimized' part vs. the standard build parameters, including the deflection of the final part top surface near the overhang and the variation of surface finish on the down-facing surfaces. Ultimately, the improvements to the in-situ process monitoring and part qualities demonstrate the utility and future potential tuning and optimizing more complex laser scan strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Model-based feedforward control of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Wang, Qian
    Michaleris, Panagiotis
    Nassar, Abdalla R.
    Irwin, Jeffrey E.
    Ren, Yong
    Stutzman, Christopher B.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 31
  • [2] Additive manufacturing of glass with laser powder bed fusion
    Datsiou, Kyriaki Corinna
    Saleh, Ehab
    Spirrett, Fiona
    Goodridge, Ruth
    Ashcroft, Ian
    Eustice, Dave
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2019, 102 (08) : 4410 - 4414
  • [3] Iterative simulation-based techniques for control of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Irwin, Jeff E.
    Wang, Qian
    Michaleris, Panagiotis
    Nassar, Abdalla R.
    Ren, Yong
    Stutzman, Christopher B.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2021, 46
  • [4] Resilience of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing to programmatically induced laser power anomalies
    Cummings, Christine
    Corbin, David J.
    Reutzel, Edward W.
    Nassar, Abdalla R.
    JOURNAL OF LASER APPLICATIONS, 2023, 35 (03)
  • [5] Laser-based powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of pure copper
    Jadhav, Suraj Dinkar
    Goossens, Louca Raphael
    Kinds, Yannis
    Van Hooreweder, Brecht
    Vanmeensel, Kim
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2021, 42
  • [6] PHYSICS-BASED FEEDFORWARD CONTROL OF THERMAL HISTORY IN LASER POWDER BED FUSION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
    Riensche, Alex
    Bevans, Benjamin
    Smoqi, Ziyad
    Yavari, Reza
    Krishnan, Ajay
    Gilligan, Josie
    Piercy, Nicholas
    Cole, Kevin
    Rao, Prahalada
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 18TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, MSEC2023, VOL 1, 2023,
  • [7] APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TWINS TO LASER POWDER BED FUSION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING PROCESS CONTROL
    Yeung, Ho
    Kim, Felix
    Donmez, Alkan
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 18TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, MSEC2023, VOL 1, 2023,
  • [8] On thermal properties of metallic powder in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Zhang, Shanshan
    Lane, Brandon
    Whiting, Justin
    Chou, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2019, 47 : 382 - 392
  • [9] Temperature Profile, Bead Geometry, and Elemental Evaporation in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process
    Faiyaz Ahsan
    Leila Ladani
    JOM, 2020, 72 : 429 - 439
  • [10] Temperature Profile, Bead Geometry, and Elemental Evaporation in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process
    Ahsan, Faiyaz
    Ladani, Leila
    JOM, 2020, 72 (01) : 429 - 439