Impact of the degree of hydronephrosis on the efficacy of in situ extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi

被引:25
|
作者
El-Assmy, Ahmed [1 ]
El-Nahas, Ahmed R. [1 ]
Youssef, Ramy F. [1 ]
El-Hefnawy, Ahmed S. [1 ]
Sheir, Khaled Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mansoura, Urol & Nephrol Ctr, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
来源
关键词
extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL); hydronephrosis; lumbar ureter; urolithiasis;
D O I
10.1080/00365590601068892
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. We conducted a prospective randomized study to investigate the relation between the degree of stone-induced hydronephrosis and the outcome of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in patients with lumbar ureter stones. Material and methods. A total of 284 patients with solitary lumbar ureter stones with or without hydronephrosis were treated with ESWL. The degree of hydronephrosis was determined by means of renal ultrasound. Patients were divided into four groups according to the degree of stone-induced hydronephrosis. The results were analyzed by comparing stone-free rates, the number of shock waves, the number of sessions, the incidence of complications, secondary interventions and time to stone clearance. Results. The mean stone size was 11.4 +/- 2.6 mm. In the hydronephrotic group, the stone-free rate was 80.3%, compared to 89.1% in patients without hydronephrosis (p = 0.12). The mean time to stone clearance was 13.8 +/- 9.8 days. Differences among the four groups in terms of stone size and treatment outcome were not significant. However, the presence of hydronephrosis was highly associated with repeat treatment (2.4 vs 1.7 treatments; p < 0.001) and prolonged clearance time (16.2 vs 11.6 days; p < 0.001). Conclusions. In cases with solitary lumbar ureter stones, the degree of hydronephrosis caused by the stone does not affect the overall treatment success with ESWL. However, stones in obstructed systems are associated with a tendency for repeat treatment and a prolonged time for stone clearance.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 213
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] URORADIOMETRIC CATHETER FOR MARKING URETERAL CALCULI DURING EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    SEIDMON, EJ
    VANARSDALEN, K
    UROLOGY, 1988, 32 (01) : 56 - 57
  • [32] TREATMENT OF URETERAL CALCULI WITH EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY USING THE LITHOSTAR DEVICE
    AHLAWAT, RK
    BHANDARI, M
    KUMAR, A
    KAPOOR, R
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 146 (03): : 737 - 741
  • [33] URETERAL CALCULI - EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY PERFORMED INSITU ON AN OUTPATIENT BASIS
    MITRE, AI
    CHAMBO, JL
    NAHAS, WC
    CABRAL, BH
    HENRIQUE, A
    SADI, MV
    ARAP, S
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 10 (04) : 213 - 215
  • [34] URORADIOMETRIC CATHETER FOR MARKING URETERAL CALCULI DURING EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    SEIDMON, EJ
    VANARSDALEN, K
    UROLOGY, 1989, : 24 - 25
  • [35] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY OF GALLBLADDER CALCULI
    SACKMANN, M
    DELIUS, M
    SAUERBRUCH, T
    HOLL, J
    WEBER, W
    HEPP, W
    WESS, O
    HAGELAUER, U
    IPPISCH, E
    BRENDEL, W
    PAUMGARTNER, G
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 1987, 5 : S58 - S58
  • [36] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY OF RENAL CALCULI
    ATALA, A
    STEINBOCK, GS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1989, 157 (03): : 350 - 358
  • [37] EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY OF PANCREATIC CALCULI
    DELHAYE, M
    VANDERMEEREN, A
    BAIZE, M
    CREMER, M
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 102 (02) : 610 - 620
  • [38] URETERAL STENTING WITH EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    CASS, AS
    UROLOGY, 1992, 39 (05) : 446 - 448
  • [39] In situ extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy as a primary treatment for ureteral stones
    Maghraby, H
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2003, 23 (1-2) : 32 - 35
  • [40] Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: Does the presence and degree of hydronephrosis affect success?
    Seitz, C
    Fajkovic, H
    Waldert, M
    Tanovic, E
    Remzi, M
    Kramer, G
    Marberger, M
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (02) : 378 - 383