Impact of the degree of hydronephrosis on the efficacy of in situ extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral calculi

被引:25
|
作者
El-Assmy, Ahmed [1 ]
El-Nahas, Ahmed R. [1 ]
Youssef, Ramy F. [1 ]
El-Hefnawy, Ahmed S. [1 ]
Sheir, Khaled Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mansoura, Urol & Nephrol Ctr, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
来源
关键词
extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL); hydronephrosis; lumbar ureter; urolithiasis;
D O I
10.1080/00365590601068892
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. We conducted a prospective randomized study to investigate the relation between the degree of stone-induced hydronephrosis and the outcome of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in patients with lumbar ureter stones. Material and methods. A total of 284 patients with solitary lumbar ureter stones with or without hydronephrosis were treated with ESWL. The degree of hydronephrosis was determined by means of renal ultrasound. Patients were divided into four groups according to the degree of stone-induced hydronephrosis. The results were analyzed by comparing stone-free rates, the number of shock waves, the number of sessions, the incidence of complications, secondary interventions and time to stone clearance. Results. The mean stone size was 11.4 +/- 2.6 mm. In the hydronephrotic group, the stone-free rate was 80.3%, compared to 89.1% in patients without hydronephrosis (p = 0.12). The mean time to stone clearance was 13.8 +/- 9.8 days. Differences among the four groups in terms of stone size and treatment outcome were not significant. However, the presence of hydronephrosis was highly associated with repeat treatment (2.4 vs 1.7 treatments; p < 0.001) and prolonged clearance time (16.2 vs 11.6 days; p < 0.001). Conclusions. In cases with solitary lumbar ureter stones, the degree of hydronephrosis caused by the stone does not affect the overall treatment success with ESWL. However, stones in obstructed systems are associated with a tendency for repeat treatment and a prolonged time for stone clearance.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 213
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TREATMENT OF URETERAL CALCULI BY EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY - UCLA EXPERIENCE
    LUPU, AN
    FUCHS, GJ
    CHAUSSY, CG
    UROLOGY, 1988, 32 (03) : 217 - 222
  • [22] Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for treatment of ureteral calculi in paediatric patients
    Tan, MÖ
    Karaoglan, Ü
    Sözen, S
    Bozkirli, I
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (06) : 471 - 474
  • [23] Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for treatment of ureteral calculi in paediatric patients
    M. Özgür Tan
    Üstünol Karaoğlan
    Sinan Sözen
    İbrahim Bozkırlı
    Pediatric Surgery International, 2003, 19 : 471 - 474
  • [24] THE ROLE OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF UPPER URETERAL CALCULI
    VANARSDALEN, KN
    BANNER, MP
    POLLACK, HM
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (04): : A291 - A291
  • [25] RADIOLOGIC TECHNIQUE TO MARK URETERAL CALCULI FOR EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    HOLLOWELL, JG
    ROTH, RA
    BECKMANN, CF
    UROLOGY, 1987, 30 (02) : 127 - 129
  • [26] IN-SITU EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY (ESWL) FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY URETERAL CALCULI IN CHILDREN
    FARSI, HMA
    MOSLI, HA
    ALZEMAITY, M
    BAHNESY, AA
    IBRAHIM, MA
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1994, 29 (10) : 1315 - 1316
  • [27] COST AND EFFICACY OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY VERSUS URETEROSCOPY IN THE TREATMENT OF LOWER URETERAL CALCULI
    KAPOOR, DA
    LEECH, JE
    YAP, WT
    ROSE, JF
    KABLER, R
    MOWAD, JJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (03): : 1095 - 1096
  • [28] Comparison of Ureteroscopic Pneumatic Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteral Calculi
    Rehman, Muhammad Fazal Ur
    Adnan, Muhammad
    Hassan, Ali, III
    Akhtar, Fawad Humayun
    Javed, Naseem
    Ali, Farman
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [30] FEMALE FERTILITY FOLLOWING EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY OF DISTAL URETERAL CALCULI
    VIEWEG, J
    WEBER, HM
    MILLER, K
    HAUTMANN, R
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (03): : 1007 - 1010