The Hemophilia Gene Therapy Patient Journey: Questions and Answers for Shared Decision-Making

被引:21
|
作者
Wang, Michael [1 ]
Negrier, Claude [2 ]
Driessler, Frank [3 ]
Goodman, Clifford [4 ]
Skinner, Mark W. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Univ Lyon, Louis Pradel Cardiol Hosp, Natl Reference Ctr Haemophilia, Lyon, France
[3] Bayer, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Lewin Grp, Falls Church, VA USA
[5] Inst Policy Adv Ltd, Washington, DC USA
[6] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
hemophilia; patients; HCP guidance; health literacy; disease awareness; treatment landscape; HEALTH LITERACY; FACTOR-VIII; CARE;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S355627
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The anticipated emergence of hemophilia gene therapy will present people with hemophilia (PWH) and treating clinicians with increasingly complex treatment options. It will be critical that PWH and their families be empowered to participate fully in decision-making through transparent communication and the development of targeted educational resources. Methods: The Council of Hemophilia Community (CHC) convened across a series of roundtable meetings to define the patient journey for hemophilia gene therapy, and to develop a question-and-answer style resource to guide discussion between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and their patients. Patient groups were also consulted during the development of this tool. Results: The CHC defined 5 key stages in the hemophilia gene therapy patient journey: pre-gene therapy (information-seeking and decision-making), treatment initiation, short-and long-term post-gene therapy follow-up. PWH will have different questions and concerns at each stage of their journey, which should be discussed with their HCP to aid decision-making. The resulting patient journey infographic and Q&A resource (see Supplementary Materials) has been developed for HCPs and PWH to provide a novel and practical roadmap of key issues and considerations throughout all stages. Conclusion: These resources support a collaborative, patient-centric, shared decision-making approach to inform treatment decision discussions between HCPs and PWH. The value of such discussions will be influenced by the language adopted; health literacy is a particularly important consideration, and these discussions should be accessible and tailored to PWH. HCPs and PWH can benefit from awareness of the common questions and uncertainties as they progress together along the patient journey. While the contents of this article are specific to hemophilia gene therapy, the concepts developed here could be adapted to aid patients in other disease states. Keywords: hemophilia, patients, HCP guidance, health literacy, disease awareness, treatment landscape
引用
收藏
页码:1439 / 1447
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SHARED DECISION-MAKING FOR HEMOPHILIA GENE THERAPY: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES AND EXPECTATIONS
    Limjoco, Jacqueline
    Reyes, Hannah
    Han, Jennifer
    Thornburg, Courtney
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2023, 98 : E65 - E66
  • [2] Gene Therapy for Hemophilia A: A Mixed Methods Study of Patient Preferences and Shared Decision-Making
    Limjoco, Jacqueline
    Thornburg, Courtney D.
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2023, 17 : 1093 - 1105
  • [3] Shared Decision-Making Is Not Patient Decision-Making
    Birnbrich, Alysa
    McCulloch, Patrick C.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2023, 15 (04): : 615 - 616
  • [4] Hemophilia A Gene Therapy - Some Answers, More Questions
    George, Lindsey A.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2023, 388 (08): : 761 - 763
  • [5] Practical answers to frequently asked questions for shared decision-making in adult spinal deformity surgery
    Ogura, Yoji
    Gum, Jeffrey L.
    Soroceanu, Alex
    Daniels, Alan H.
    Line, Breton
    Protopsaltis, Themistocles
    Hostin, Richard A.
    Passias, Peter G.
    Burton, Douglas C.
    Smith, Justin S.
    Shaffrey, Christopher, I
    Lafage, Virginie
    Lafage, Renaud
    Klineberg, Eric O.
    Kim, Han Jo
    Harris, Andrew
    Kebaish, Khaled
    Schwab, Frank
    Bess, Shay
    Ames, Christopher P.
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 34 (02) : 218 - 227
  • [6] Patient Engagement and Shared Decision-Making
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Mulla, Sohail M.
    Scott, Ian A.
    Jackevicius, Cynthia A.
    You, John J.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 (04) : 562 - 562
  • [7] Patient Engagement and Shared Decision-Making
    Gordon H. Guyatt
    Sohail M. Mulla
    Ian A. Scott
    Cynthia A. Jackevicius
    John J. You
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2014, 29 : 562 - 562
  • [8] Shared decision-making and patient autonomy
    Lars Sandman
    Christian Munthe
    Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2009, 30 : 289 - 310
  • [9] Shared decision-making and patient autonomy
    Sandman, Lars
    Munthe, Christian
    THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, 2009, 30 (04) : 289 - 310
  • [10] Journey of Excellence: Implementing a Shared Decision-Making Model
    Murray, Karen
    Yasso, Sabrina
    Schomburg, Roberta
    Terhune, Molly
    Beidelschies, Marissa
    Bowers, Devin
    Goodyear-Bruch, Caryl
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2016, 116 (04) : 50 - 56