The Hemophilia Gene Therapy Patient Journey: Questions and Answers for Shared Decision-Making

被引:21
|
作者
Wang, Michael [1 ]
Negrier, Claude [2 ]
Driessler, Frank [3 ]
Goodman, Clifford [4 ]
Skinner, Mark W. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Univ Lyon, Louis Pradel Cardiol Hosp, Natl Reference Ctr Haemophilia, Lyon, France
[3] Bayer, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Lewin Grp, Falls Church, VA USA
[5] Inst Policy Adv Ltd, Washington, DC USA
[6] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
hemophilia; patients; HCP guidance; health literacy; disease awareness; treatment landscape; HEALTH LITERACY; FACTOR-VIII; CARE;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S355627
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The anticipated emergence of hemophilia gene therapy will present people with hemophilia (PWH) and treating clinicians with increasingly complex treatment options. It will be critical that PWH and their families be empowered to participate fully in decision-making through transparent communication and the development of targeted educational resources. Methods: The Council of Hemophilia Community (CHC) convened across a series of roundtable meetings to define the patient journey for hemophilia gene therapy, and to develop a question-and-answer style resource to guide discussion between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and their patients. Patient groups were also consulted during the development of this tool. Results: The CHC defined 5 key stages in the hemophilia gene therapy patient journey: pre-gene therapy (information-seeking and decision-making), treatment initiation, short-and long-term post-gene therapy follow-up. PWH will have different questions and concerns at each stage of their journey, which should be discussed with their HCP to aid decision-making. The resulting patient journey infographic and Q&A resource (see Supplementary Materials) has been developed for HCPs and PWH to provide a novel and practical roadmap of key issues and considerations throughout all stages. Conclusion: These resources support a collaborative, patient-centric, shared decision-making approach to inform treatment decision discussions between HCPs and PWH. The value of such discussions will be influenced by the language adopted; health literacy is a particularly important consideration, and these discussions should be accessible and tailored to PWH. HCPs and PWH can benefit from awareness of the common questions and uncertainties as they progress together along the patient journey. While the contents of this article are specific to hemophilia gene therapy, the concepts developed here could be adapted to aid patients in other disease states. Keywords: hemophilia, patients, HCP guidance, health literacy, disease awareness, treatment landscape
引用
收藏
页码:1439 / 1447
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Shared decision-making and patient-centred care
    Solari, A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2013, 260 : S9 - S9
  • [42] Shared Decision-Making and Patient Control in Radiation Oncology
    Shabason, Jacob E.
    Mao, Jun J.
    Frankel, Eitan S.
    Vapiwala, Neha
    CANCER, 2014, 120 (12) : 1863 - 1870
  • [43] Patient Perceptions of Shared Decision-Making in Emergency Surgery
    Spence, Rachel
    Bisset, Carly
    Moug, Susan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [44] Shared Decision-Making and Patient Communication in Nephrology Practice
    Mandel, Ernest I.
    Fox, Monica
    Schell, Jane O.
    Cohen, Robert A.
    ADVANCES IN KIDNEY DISEASE AND HEALTH, 2024, 31 (01): : 5 - 12
  • [45] The argumentative role of patient companions in (shared) decision-making
    van Poppel, Lotte
    Pilgram, Roosmaryn
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2025, 133
  • [46] Patient perspectives of shared decision-making in emergency surgery
    Spence, Rachel
    Moug, Susan Joan
    Minnis, Meghan
    Chaudhary, Attika
    Docherty, Mairi
    Jamal, Sherzah
    Mactavish, Shona
    Bisset, Carly Nichola
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2025, 27 (02)
  • [47] Shared decision-making in psychiatry: a study of patient attitudes
    Nott, Josie
    Mcintosh, Aspen
    Taube, Clare
    Taylor, Mark
    AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 26 (05) : 478 - 481
  • [48] Communicating shared decision-making: Cancer patient perspectives
    Thorne, Sally
    Oliffe, John L.
    Stajduhar, Kelli I.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 90 (03) : 291 - 296
  • [49] Shared decision-making as an existential journey: Aiming for restored autonomous capacity
    Gulbrandsen, Pal
    Clayman, Marla L.
    Beach, Mary Catherine
    Han, Paul K.
    Boss, Emily F.
    Ofstad, Eirik H.
    Elwyn, Glyn
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (09) : 1505 - 1510
  • [50] Decision-making in nephrology: shared decision making?
    Lelie, A
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2000, 39 (01) : 81 - 89