Vestibular Preservation After Cochlear Implantation Using the Round Window Approach

被引:5
|
作者
Tsukada, Keita [1 ]
Usami, Shin-ichi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shinshu Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, Sch Med, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
[2] Shinshu Univ, Dept Hearing Implant Sci, Sch Med, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
cochlear implant; vestibular function; round window approach; caloric testing; cVEMP; oVEMP;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2021.656592
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The development of less traumatic surgical techniques, such as the round window approach (RWA), as well as the use of flexible electrodes and post-operative steroid administration have enabled the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation (CI) surgery. However, consideration must still be given to the complications that can accompany CI. One such potential complication is the impairment of vestibular function with resulting vertigo symptoms. The aim of our current study was to examine the changes in vestibular function after implantation in patients who received CI using less traumatic surgery, particularly the RWA technique. Methods: Sixty-six patients who received CI in our center were examined by caloric testing, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) before or after implantation, or both, to obtain data on semicircular canal, saccular and utricular function, respectively. Less traumatic CI surgery was performed by the use of the RWA and insertion of flexible electrodes such as MED-EL FLEX soft, FLEX 28, and FLEX 24 (Innsbruck, Austria). Results: Caloric response and the asymmetry ratio of cVEMP and oVEMP were examined before and after implantation using less traumatic surgical techniques. Compared with before implantation, 93.9, 82.4, and 92.5% of the patients showed preserved vestibular function after implantation based on caloric testing, cVEMP and oVEMP results, respectively. We also examined the results for vestibular function by a comparison of the 66 patients using the RWA and flexible electrodes, and 17 patients who underwent cochleostomy and insertion of conventional or hard electrodes. We measured responses using caloric testing, cVEMP and oVEMP in patients after CI. There were no differences in the frequencies of abnormal caloric and oVEMP results in the implanted ears between the RWA and cochleostomy. On the other hand, the frequency of abnormal cVEMP responses in the implanted ears in the patients who received implantation by cochleostomy was significantly higher than that in the patients undergoing surgery using the RWA. Conclusion: Patients receiving CI using less traumatic surgical techniques such as RWA and flexible electrodes have reduced risk of damage to vestibular function.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Change of vestibular function after cochlear implantation
    Szirmai, A
    Ribári, O
    Répássy, G
    OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGIA NOVA, 1999, 9 (06) : 225 - 228
  • [42] Vestibular dysfunction after cochlear implantation - Comment
    Black, O
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2003, 24 (02) : 242 - 242
  • [43] Ipsilateral Vestibular Schwannoma after Cochlear Implantation
    Tuepker, S.
    Ay, N.
    Scholtz, L. U.
    Gehl, H. B.
    Mautner, V. F.
    Goon, P.
    Sudhoff, H.
    Todt, I.
    CASE REPORTS IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 2022
  • [44] Cochlear implantation after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma
    Patel, Neil S.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    Link, Michael J.
    Neff, Brian A.
    Van Gompel, Jamie J.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 135 (01) : 126 - 135
  • [45] Cochlear Implantation After Radiotherapy of Vestibular Schwannomas
    Tian, Luchen
    West, Niels
    Caye-Thomasen, Per
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2021, 17 (05): : 452 - 460
  • [46] Endoscopic approach to the round window through posterior tympanotomy for cochlear implantation in children: A study on feasibility
    Nassif, Nader
    de Zinis, Luca Oscar Redaelli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 129
  • [47] A comparison between neural response telemetry via cochleostomy or the round window approach in cochlear implantation
    Hamerschmidt, Rogerio
    Schuch, Luiz Henrique
    Rezende, Rodrigo Kopp
    Minhoto Wiemes, Gislaine Richter
    Pires de Oliveira, Adriana Kosma
    Mocellin, Marcos
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 78 (04) : 71 - 75
  • [48] Alteration of the relative vibration of the round window membrane after implantation of a direct acoustic cochlear implant
    D'hondt, Christiane
    Wouters, Jan
    Verhaert, Nicolas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 59 (05) : 341 - 347
  • [49] Cochlear implantation and residual hearing preservation long-term follow-up of the first consecutively operated patients using the round window approach in Uppsala, Sweden
    Schart-Moren, Nadine
    Erixon, Elsa
    Li, Hao
    Rask-Andersen, Helge
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 21 (05) : 246 - 259
  • [50] Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Technique in Cochlear Implantation: Histologic Findings
    Richard, Celine
    Fayad, Jose N.
    Doherty, Joni
    Linthicum, Fred H., Jr.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2012, 33 (07) : 1181 - 1187