Vestibular Preservation After Cochlear Implantation Using the Round Window Approach

被引:5
|
作者
Tsukada, Keita [1 ]
Usami, Shin-ichi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shinshu Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, Sch Med, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
[2] Shinshu Univ, Dept Hearing Implant Sci, Sch Med, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
cochlear implant; vestibular function; round window approach; caloric testing; cVEMP; oVEMP;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2021.656592
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The development of less traumatic surgical techniques, such as the round window approach (RWA), as well as the use of flexible electrodes and post-operative steroid administration have enabled the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation (CI) surgery. However, consideration must still be given to the complications that can accompany CI. One such potential complication is the impairment of vestibular function with resulting vertigo symptoms. The aim of our current study was to examine the changes in vestibular function after implantation in patients who received CI using less traumatic surgery, particularly the RWA technique. Methods: Sixty-six patients who received CI in our center were examined by caloric testing, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) before or after implantation, or both, to obtain data on semicircular canal, saccular and utricular function, respectively. Less traumatic CI surgery was performed by the use of the RWA and insertion of flexible electrodes such as MED-EL FLEX soft, FLEX 28, and FLEX 24 (Innsbruck, Austria). Results: Caloric response and the asymmetry ratio of cVEMP and oVEMP were examined before and after implantation using less traumatic surgical techniques. Compared with before implantation, 93.9, 82.4, and 92.5% of the patients showed preserved vestibular function after implantation based on caloric testing, cVEMP and oVEMP results, respectively. We also examined the results for vestibular function by a comparison of the 66 patients using the RWA and flexible electrodes, and 17 patients who underwent cochleostomy and insertion of conventional or hard electrodes. We measured responses using caloric testing, cVEMP and oVEMP in patients after CI. There were no differences in the frequencies of abnormal caloric and oVEMP results in the implanted ears between the RWA and cochleostomy. On the other hand, the frequency of abnormal cVEMP responses in the implanted ears in the patients who received implantation by cochleostomy was significantly higher than that in the patients undergoing surgery using the RWA. Conclusion: Patients receiving CI using less traumatic surgical techniques such as RWA and flexible electrodes have reduced risk of damage to vestibular function.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Round window accessibility during cochlear implantation
    Konrad Stuermer
    Tanja Winter
    Lisa Nachtsheim
    Jens Peter Klussmann
    Jan Christoffer Luers
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021, 278 : 363 - 370
  • [22] Variations in electrode impedance during and after cochlear implantation: Round window versus extended round window insertions
    Wang, Jun
    Sun, Jiaqiang
    Sun, Jingwu
    Chen, Jianwen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 102 : 44 - 48
  • [23] Modelling the effect of round window stiffness on residual hearing after cochlear implantation
    Elliott, Stephen J.
    Ni, Guangjian
    Verschuur, Carl A.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2016, 341 : 155 - 167
  • [24] Oval and round window assessment during cochlear implantation
    Bonabi, Sharouz
    Bodmer, Daniel
    Eiber, Albrecht
    Dillier, Norbert
    Veraguth, Dorothe
    Huber, Alexander M.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2010, 263 (1-2) : 238 - 238
  • [25] Endoscopic visualisation of the round window during cochlear implantation
    Jain, A.
    Sharma, R.
    Passey, J. C.
    Meher, R.
    Bansal, R.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2020, 134 (03): : 219 - 221
  • [26] Spectral resolution and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the round window versus cochleostomy technique
    Demir, B.
    Yuksel, M.
    Atilgan, A.
    Ciprut, A.
    Batman, C.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2021, 135 (06): : 513 - 517
  • [27] Vestibular dysfunction after cochlear implantation
    Fina, M
    Skinner, M
    Goebel, JA
    Piccirillo, JF
    Neely, JG
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2003, 24 (02) : 234 - 242
  • [28] Objective evaluation, using computed tomography, of round window access for cochlear implantation
    Radomska, Katarzyna
    Mielnik, Michal
    Gostynski, Marcin
    Dzieciolowska-Baran, Edyta
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 281 (12) : 6367 - 6376
  • [29] Electrode Misdirection into the Superior Semicircular Canal: Complication of Cochlear Implantation by Round Window Approach
    Kim, Minbum
    Yang, Won Sun
    Jeon, Ju Hyun
    Choi, Jae Young
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2014, 10 (03): : 246 - 250
  • [30] Radiological parameters related to success of the round window approach in cochlear implantation: A retrospective study
    Kang, Jae-Yoon
    Chung, Jee-Hye
    Park, Hee-Sung
    Park, Yong-Ho
    Choi, Jin Woong
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 43 (06) : 1535 - 1540