An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Development and interrater reliability

被引:11
|
作者
De Groef, An [1 ,2 ]
Van Kampen, Marijke [1 ,2 ]
Vervloesem, Nele [1 ,2 ]
De Geyter, Sophie [1 ,2 ]
Dieltjens, Evi [1 ,2 ]
Christiaens, Marie-Rose [3 ,4 ]
Neven, Patrick [3 ,5 ]
Geraerts, Inge [1 ,2 ]
Devoogdt, Nele [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, Dept Rehabil Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Leuven, Multidisciplinary Breast Ctr, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, Dept Surg Oncol, Leuven, Belgium
[5] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Leuven, Belgium
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 06期
关键词
TRIGGER POINTS; PAIN; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0179116
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose To develop a tool to evaluate myofascial adhesions objectively in patients with breast cancer and to investigate its interrater reliability. Methods 1) Development of the evaluation tool. Literature was searched, experts in the field of myofascial therapy were consulted and pilot testing was performed. 2) Thirty patients (63% had a mastectomy, 37% breast-conserving surgery and 97% radiotherapy) with myofascial adhesions were evaluated using the developed tool by 2 independent raters. The Weighted Kappa (WK) and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. Results 1) The evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients with Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool) consisted of the assessment of myofascial adhesions at 7 locations: axillary and breast region scars, musculi pectorales region, axilla, frontal chest wall, lateral chest wall and the inframammary fold. At each location the degree of the myofascial adhesion was scored at three levels (skin, superficial and deep) on a 4-points scale (between no adhesions and very stiff adhesions). Additionally, a total score (0-9) was calculated, i.e. the sum of the different levels of each location. 2) Interrater agreement of the different levels separately was moderate for the axillary and mastectomy scar (WK 0.62-0.73) and good for the scar on the breast (WK > 0.75). Moderate agreement was reached for almost all levels of the non-scar locations. Interrater reliability of the total scores was the highest for the scars (ICC0.82-0.99). At non-scar locations good interrater reliability was reached, except for the inframammary fold (ICC = 0.71). Conclusions The total scores of all locations of the MAP-BC evaluation tool had good to excellent interrater reliability, except for the inframammary fold which only reached moderate reliability.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ICG fluorescence imaging as a new tool for optimization of pathological evaluation in breast cancer tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Veys, Isabelle
    Pop, Catalin-Florin
    Barbieux, Romain
    Moreau, Michel
    Noterman, Danielle
    De Neubourg, Filip
    Nogaret, Jean-Marie
    Liberale, Gabriel
    Larsimont, Denis
    Bourgeois, Pierre
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (05):
  • [42] Development and evaluation of a risk assessment tool for the personalized screening of breast cancer in Chinese populations: A prospective cohort study
    Zhu, Juan
    Wang, Le
    Gong, Weiwei
    Li, Xue
    Wang, Youqing
    Zhu, Chen
    Li, Huizhang
    Shi, Lei
    Yang, Chen
    Du, Lingbin
    CANCER, 2024, 130 : 1403 - 1414
  • [43] Multidimensional geriatric evaluation for older cancer patients as a clinical and research tool
    Brunello, Antonella
    Sandri, Riccardo
    Extermann, Martine
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2009, 35 (06) : 487 - 492
  • [44] A Tool for Deprescribing Antithrombotic Medication in Palliative Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Evaluation
    Riveras, Angela
    Crul, Mirjam
    van der Kloes, Jozien
    Steegers, Monique
    Huisman, Bregje
    JOURNAL OF PAIN & PALLIATIVE CARE PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2024, 38 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [45] Evaluation of the Biopsychosocial Needs of Young Patients with Cancer by Adapting the Sisom Tool
    Stamoulara, A.
    Perdikaris, P.
    Matziou, V.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2016, 63 : S217 - S217
  • [46] Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients
    Tomoko Ohura
    Kimitaka Hase
    Yoshie Nakajima
    Takeo Nakayama
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17
  • [47] Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients
    Ohura, Tomoko
    Hase, Kimitaka
    Nakajima, Yoshie
    Nakayama, Takeo
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [48] BC-BET v2.0: Updates to an online Bladder Cancer Biomarker Evaluation tool
    Dancik, Garrett M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (12)
  • [49] Development and psychometric evaluation of the Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology, a tool for standardized assessment of cancer patients
    Knight, Lucie
    Mussell, Monika
    Brandl, Tobias
    Herschbach, Peter
    Marten-Mittag, Birgitt
    Treiber, Martina
    Keller, Monika
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2008, 64 (04) : 373 - 381
  • [50] Hypothyroidism evaluation after radiotherapy of breast and supraclavicular in patients with breast cancer
    Karimijavid, Mohammad R.
    Pashaki, Abdolazim S.
    Borzouei, Shiva
    Khanlarzadeh, Elham
    Gholami, Mohammad H.
    Nikzad, Safoora
    ADVANCED BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (01): : 44