An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Development and interrater reliability

被引:11
|
作者
De Groef, An [1 ,2 ]
Van Kampen, Marijke [1 ,2 ]
Vervloesem, Nele [1 ,2 ]
De Geyter, Sophie [1 ,2 ]
Dieltjens, Evi [1 ,2 ]
Christiaens, Marie-Rose [3 ,4 ]
Neven, Patrick [3 ,5 ]
Geraerts, Inge [1 ,2 ]
Devoogdt, Nele [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, Dept Rehabil Sci, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Leuven, Multidisciplinary Breast Ctr, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, Dept Surg Oncol, Leuven, Belgium
[5] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Leuven, Belgium
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 06期
关键词
TRIGGER POINTS; PAIN; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0179116
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose To develop a tool to evaluate myofascial adhesions objectively in patients with breast cancer and to investigate its interrater reliability. Methods 1) Development of the evaluation tool. Literature was searched, experts in the field of myofascial therapy were consulted and pilot testing was performed. 2) Thirty patients (63% had a mastectomy, 37% breast-conserving surgery and 97% radiotherapy) with myofascial adhesions were evaluated using the developed tool by 2 independent raters. The Weighted Kappa (WK) and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. Results 1) The evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients with Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool) consisted of the assessment of myofascial adhesions at 7 locations: axillary and breast region scars, musculi pectorales region, axilla, frontal chest wall, lateral chest wall and the inframammary fold. At each location the degree of the myofascial adhesion was scored at three levels (skin, superficial and deep) on a 4-points scale (between no adhesions and very stiff adhesions). Additionally, a total score (0-9) was calculated, i.e. the sum of the different levels of each location. 2) Interrater agreement of the different levels separately was moderate for the axillary and mastectomy scar (WK 0.62-0.73) and good for the scar on the breast (WK > 0.75). Moderate agreement was reached for almost all levels of the non-scar locations. Interrater reliability of the total scores was the highest for the scars (ICC0.82-0.99). At non-scar locations good interrater reliability was reached, except for the inframammary fold (ICC = 0.71). Conclusions The total scores of all locations of the MAP-BC evaluation tool had good to excellent interrater reliability, except for the inframammary fold which only reached moderate reliability.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A New Tool for Nutrition App Quality Evaluation (AQEL): Development, Validation, and Reliability Testing
    DiFilippo, Kristen Nicole
    Huang, Wenhao
    Chapman-Novakofski, Karen M.
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2017, 5 (10):
  • [32] Evaluation of a breast/ovarian cancer genetics referral screening tool in a mammography population
    Bellcross, Cecelia A.
    Lemke, Amy A.
    Pape, Laura S.
    Tess, Angela L.
    Meisner, Lorraine T.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 11 (11) : 783 - 789
  • [33] Evaluation of nipple aspirate fluid as a diagnostic tool for early detection of breast cancer
    Sadr-ul Shaheed
    Catherine Tait
    Kyriacos Kyriacou
    Richard Linforth
    Mohamed Salhab
    Chris Sutton
    Clinical Proteomics, 2018, 15
  • [34] Evaluation of a digital reporting and supporting tool in breast cancer prevention trials (KarmApp)
    Tapia, Jose
    Gabrielson, Marike
    Hammarstrom, Mattias
    Wengstrom, Yvonne
    Bergqvist, Jenny
    Tuuliainen, Aki
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Czene, Kamila
    Hall, Per
    Backlund, Magnus
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [35] Evaluation of nipple aspirate fluid as a diagnostic tool for early detection of breast cancer
    Shaheed, Sadr-ul
    Tait, Catherine
    Kyriacou, Kyriacos
    Linforth, Richard
    Salhab, Mohamed
    Sutton, Chris
    CLINICAL PROTEOMICS, 2018, 15
  • [36] RANKL circulating levels in the evaluation of bone response in breast cancer (BC) patients
    Ibrahim, Toni
    Mercatali, Laura
    Ricci, Marianna
    Scarpi, Emanuela
    Ricci, Rossana
    Bongiovanni, Alberto
    Zavoiu, Venetia
    Riva, Nada
    Calpona, Sebastiano
    Liverani, Chiara
    Oboldi, Devil
    Amadori, Elena
    La Manna, Federico
    De Vita, Alessandro
    Foca, Flavia
    Gunelli, Erica
    Monti, Manuela
    Serra, Patrizia
    Amadori, Dino
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [37] Development and evaluation of an auto-segmentation tool for the left anterior descending coronary artery of breast cancer patients based on anatomical landmarks
    van den Bogaard, Veerle A. B.
    van Dijk, Lisanne V.
    Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn
    Sijtsema, Nanna M.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Maduro, John H.
    Crijns, Anne P. G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 136 : 15 - 20
  • [38] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Sexual Life Quality Evaluation Tool for Patients With Coronary Heart Disease
    Zhang, Fengpei
    Li, Yachai
    Shi, Zhili
    Fan, Yingying
    Wang, Aiping
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024,
  • [39] Development of a fast neurocognitive evaluation tool in GBM patients undergoing radiotherapy
    Tummolo, Aida Angela
    Bracci, Serena
    Di Capua, Beatrice
    Mazzarella, Ciro
    Bartoli, Francesco Beghella
    Martino, Antonella
    Bertolini, Roberta
    Mariani, Silvia
    Dinapoli, Loredana
    Bellieni, Andrea
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Chiesa, Silvia
    Colloca, Giuseppe Ferdinando
    Tagliaferri, Luca
    Gambacorta, Maria Antonietta
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S945 - S946
  • [40] eHealth tool for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: development and initial evaluation
    Nilsson, Olga
    Hultgren, Rebecka
    Letterstal, Anna
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2020, 34 (02) : 348 - 356