Agreement of bioelectrical resistance, reactance, and phase angle values from supine and standing bioimpedance analyzers

被引:34
|
作者
Dellinger, Jacob R. [1 ]
Johnson, Baylor A. [1 ]
Benavides, Marqui L. [1 ]
Moore, M. Lane [1 ,2 ]
Stratton, Matthew T. [1 ]
Harty, Patrick S. [1 ]
Siedler, Madelin R. [1 ]
Tinsley, Grant M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Kinesiol & Sport Management, Energy Balance & Body Composit Lab, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Alix Sch Med, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
bioelectrical impedance analysis; bioimpedance spectroscopy; phase angle; impedance; body composition; POPULATION REFERENCE VALUES; IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS; BODY; AGE; SEX;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6579/abe6fa
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Objective. Bioimpedance devices are commonly used to assess health parameters and track changes in body composition. However, the cross-sectional agreement between different devices has not been conclusively established. Thus, the objective of this investigation was to examine the agreement between raw bioelectrical variables (resistance, reactance, and phase angle at the 50 kHz frequency) obtained from three bioimpedance analyzers. Approach. Healthy male (n = 76, mean SD; 33.8 14.5 years; 83.9 15.1 kg; 179.4 6.9 cm) and female (n = 103, mean SD; 33.4 15.9 years; 65.6 12.1 kg; 164.9 6.4 cm) participants completed assessments using three bioimpedance devices: supine bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), supine single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SFBIA), and standing multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA). Differences in raw bioelectrical variables between the devices were quantified via one-way analysis of variance for the total sample and for each sex. Equivalence testing was used to determine equivalence between methods. Main results. Significant differences in all bioelectrical variables were observed between the three devices when examining the total sample and males only. The devices appeared to exhibit slightly better agreement when analyzing female participants only. Equivalence testing using the total sample as well as males and females separately revealed that resistance and phase angle were equivalent between the supine devices (BIS, SFBIA), but not with the standing analyzer (MFBIA). Significance. The present study demonstrated disagreement between different bioimpedance analyzers for quantifying raw bioelectrical variables, with the poorest agreement between devices that employed different body positions during testing. These results suggest that researchers and clinicians should employ device-specific reference values to classify participants based on raw bioelectrical variables, such as phase angle. If reference values are needed but are unavailable for a particular bioimpedance analyzer, the set of reference values produced using the most similar analyzer and reference population should be selected.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] The bioimpedance phase angle may be associated with frailty in rheumatoid arthritis patients: Results from a prospective, cohort study
    Matsumoto, Yoshinari
    Tada, Masahiro
    Yamada, Yutaro
    Mandai, Koji
    Hidaka, Noriaki
    Koike, Tatsuya
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 33 (04) : 732 - 738
  • [32] Phase angle and standardized phase angle from bioelectrical impedance measurements as a prognostic factor for mortality at 90 days in patients with COVID-19: A longitudinal cohort study
    Cornejo-Pareja, Isabel
    Vegas-Aguilar, Isabel M.
    Garcia-Almeida, Jose Manuel
    Bellido-Guerrero, Diego
    Talluri, Antonio
    Lukaski, Henry
    Tinahones, Francisco J.
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2022, 41 (12) : 3106 - 3114
  • [33] Relationship between the phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis and daily physical activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
    Matsumoto, Yoshinari
    Tada, Masahiro
    Yamada, Yutaro
    Mandai, Koji
    Hidaka, Noriaki
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (02) : 340 - 345
  • [34] Relation of leg phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis with voluntary and evoked contractile properties of the plantar flexors
    Hirata, Kosuke
    Yamada, Yosuke
    Iida, Natsuki
    Kanda, Akihiro
    Shoji, Mikio
    Yoshida, Tsukasa
    Akagi, Ryota
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [35] PHASE ANGLE AND VECTOR ANALYSIS FROM MULTIFREQUENCY SEGMENTAL BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS: NEW REFERENCE DATA FOR OLDER ADULTS
    Reljic, D.
    Zarafat, D.
    Jensen, B.
    Herrmann, H. J.
    Neurath, M. F.
    Konturek, P. C.
    Zopf, Y.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 71 (04): : 491 - 499
  • [36] Bioelectrical phase angle as a marker for incident type 2 diabetes and glycaemic deterioration: results from the MONICA/KORA studies
    Ai, F.
    Huemer, M-T.
    Rathmann, W.
    Roden, M.
    Nano, J.
    Drey, M.
    Peters, A.
    Thorand, B.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2024, 67 : S163 - S163
  • [37] Association between phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis and level of physical activity: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mundstock, Eduardo
    Amaral, Marina Azambuja
    Baptista, Rafael R.
    Sarria, Edgar E.
    Grecco dos Santos, Rejane Rosaria
    Detoni Filho, Adriano
    Rodrigues, Carlos Alberto S.
    Forte, Gabriele Carra
    Castro, Luciano
    Padoin, Alexandre Vontobel
    Stein, Ricardo
    Perez, Lisiane Marcal
    Ziegelmann, Patricia Klarmann
    Mattiello, Rita
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2019, 38 (04) : 1504 - 1510
  • [38] Association between Physical Activity Level, Body Composition, and Phase Angle in University Students from Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)
    Musijowska, Monika
    Kwilosz, Edyta
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (10)
  • [39] Muscle quality improvement in subacute post-stroke patients after rehabilitation: Usefulness of segmental phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis
    Guerrini, Alessandro
    Siotto, Mariacristina
    Germanotta, Marco
    Cipollini, Valeria
    Cortellini, Laura
    Pavan, Arianna
    Insalaco, Sabina
    Khazrai, Yeganeh Manon
    Aprile, Irene
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2024, 43 (01) : 224 - 231
  • [40] Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis remains an independent predictive marker in HIV-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral treatment
    Schwenk, A
    Beisenherz, A
    Römer, K
    Kremer, G
    Salzberger, B
    Elia, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2000, 72 (02): : 496 - 501