Agreement of bioelectrical resistance, reactance, and phase angle values from supine and standing bioimpedance analyzers

被引:34
|
作者
Dellinger, Jacob R. [1 ]
Johnson, Baylor A. [1 ]
Benavides, Marqui L. [1 ]
Moore, M. Lane [1 ,2 ]
Stratton, Matthew T. [1 ]
Harty, Patrick S. [1 ]
Siedler, Madelin R. [1 ]
Tinsley, Grant M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Kinesiol & Sport Management, Energy Balance & Body Composit Lab, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Alix Sch Med, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
bioelectrical impedance analysis; bioimpedance spectroscopy; phase angle; impedance; body composition; POPULATION REFERENCE VALUES; IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS; BODY; AGE; SEX;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6579/abe6fa
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Objective. Bioimpedance devices are commonly used to assess health parameters and track changes in body composition. However, the cross-sectional agreement between different devices has not been conclusively established. Thus, the objective of this investigation was to examine the agreement between raw bioelectrical variables (resistance, reactance, and phase angle at the 50 kHz frequency) obtained from three bioimpedance analyzers. Approach. Healthy male (n = 76, mean SD; 33.8 14.5 years; 83.9 15.1 kg; 179.4 6.9 cm) and female (n = 103, mean SD; 33.4 15.9 years; 65.6 12.1 kg; 164.9 6.4 cm) participants completed assessments using three bioimpedance devices: supine bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), supine single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SFBIA), and standing multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA). Differences in raw bioelectrical variables between the devices were quantified via one-way analysis of variance for the total sample and for each sex. Equivalence testing was used to determine equivalence between methods. Main results. Significant differences in all bioelectrical variables were observed between the three devices when examining the total sample and males only. The devices appeared to exhibit slightly better agreement when analyzing female participants only. Equivalence testing using the total sample as well as males and females separately revealed that resistance and phase angle were equivalent between the supine devices (BIS, SFBIA), but not with the standing analyzer (MFBIA). Significance. The present study demonstrated disagreement between different bioimpedance analyzers for quantifying raw bioelectrical variables, with the poorest agreement between devices that employed different body positions during testing. These results suggest that researchers and clinicians should employ device-specific reference values to classify participants based on raw bioelectrical variables, such as phase angle. If reference values are needed but are unavailable for a particular bioimpedance analyzer, the set of reference values produced using the most similar analyzer and reference population should be selected.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Associations between Phase Angle Values Obtained by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in an Overweight Population
    Chen, Guangya
    Lv, Yi
    Ni, Wei
    Shi, Qingxin
    Xiang, Xingliang
    Li, Sen
    Song, Chengwu
    Xiao, Mingzhong
    Jin, Shuna
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [22] Can phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis associate with neuromuscular properties of the knee extensors?
    Hirata, Kosuke
    Ito, Mari
    Nomura, Yuta
    Yoshida, Tsukasa
    Yamada, Yosuke
    Akagi, Ryota
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [23] Standardized phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis as prognostic factor for survival in patients with cancer
    Silvana Iturriet Paiva
    Lúcia R. Borges
    Denise Halpern-Silveira
    M. Cecília F. Assunção
    Aluisio J. D. Barros
    M. Cristina Gonzalez
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2011, 19 : 187 - 192
  • [24] Standardized phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis as prognostic factor for survival in patients with cancer
    Paiva, Silvana Iturriet
    Borges, Lucia R.
    Halpern-Silveira, Denise
    Assuncao, M. Cecilia F.
    Barros, Aluisio J. D.
    Gonzalez, M. Cristina
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2011, 19 (02) : 187 - 192
  • [25] Phase Angle from Bioelectrical Impedance is Reduced and Related to Muscle Strength in Children and Adolescents with Cancer
    Stoessel, S.
    Neu, M. A.
    Wingerter, A.
    Paret, C.
    El Malki, K.
    Henninger, N.
    Russo, A.
    Otto, H.
    Lehmann, N.
    Baumann, F. T.
    Zimmer, P.
    Bloch, W.
    Faber, J.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2018, 65 : S545 - S546
  • [26] Leucine metabolites do not induce changes in phase angle, bioimpedance vector analysis patterns, and strength in resistance trained men
    Campa, F.
    Matias, C. N.
    Teixeira, F. J.
    Reis, J. F.
    Valamatos, M. J.
    Toselli, S.
    Monteiro, C. P.
    APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2021, 46 (06) : 669 - 675
  • [27] Effects of Different Volume of Resistance Training on Bioimpedance Phase Angle, Muscular Strength, and Quality of Life among Diabetes Patients
    Sisir, M. F.
    Azidin, R. M. F. Raja
    Hasan, H.
    Ghani, R. Abdul
    Omar, M.
    Ismail, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 297 : 24 - 25
  • [28] Effect of resistance training on bioelectrical phase angle in older adults: a systematic review with Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Campa, Francesco
    Colognesi, Lucas Antonio
    Moro, Tatiana
    Paoli, Antonio
    Casolo, Andrea
    Santos, Leandro
    Correia, Rafael Ribeiro
    Lemes, Italo Ribeiro
    Milanez, Vinicius Flavio
    Christofaro, Diego Destro
    Cyrino, Edilson Serpeloni
    Gobbo, Luis Alberto
    REVIEWS IN ENDOCRINE & METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (03): : 439 - 449
  • [29] Reference values for the phase angle of the electrical bioimpedance: Systematic review and meta-analysis involving more than 250,000 subjects
    Mattiello, Rita
    Amaral, Mariana Azambuja
    Mundstock, Eduardo
    Ziegelmann, Patricia Klarmann
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2020, 39 (05) : 1411 - 1417
  • [30] Effect of resistance training on bioelectrical phase angle in older adults: a systematic review with Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Francesco Campa
    Lucas Antonio Colognesi
    Tatiana Moro
    Antonio Paoli
    Andrea Casolo
    Leandro Santos
    Rafael Ribeiro Correia
    Ítalo Ribeiro Lemes
    Vinícius Flávio Milanez
    Diego Destro Christofaro
    Edilson Serpeloni Cyrino
    Luís Alberto Gobbo
    Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 2023, 24 (3) : 439 - 449