The impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on BIRADS categorization of mammographic non-mass findings

被引:0
|
作者
Fattah, Nadia Mohamed Ahmed Abdel [1 ]
Zahran, Mohamed H. [2 ]
Fawzy, Rawya K. [1 ]
Hamid, Alaa El Din M. Abdel [2 ]
Maghraby, Hala K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alexandria, Med Res Inst, Dept Radiodiag, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Radiodiag & Intervent, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] Univ Alexandria, Med Res Inst, Dept Pathol, Alexandria, Egypt
关键词
Breast cancer; Digital Breast Tomosynthesis; mammography; BIRADS; ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1080/20905068.2021.1916244
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Mammography is the most used breast screening tool and was proven to reduce breast-cancer-associated mortality. The estimated sensitivity of mammography varies between 77% and 95%; however, sensitivity could be 26% lower in dense breasts than in entirely fatty breasts. The ability to represent the complex 3D breast architecture and early changes in anatomical structures in a 2D view is the biggest challenge for mammography. In Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), tomographic images are reconstructed from multiple projections acquired from different angles. This technique allows the generation of 3D data, reduction of tissue overlap and allows better evaluation of masses, architectural distortion, and asymmetries compared with conventional two-dimensional mammographic images. Objective: To evaluate the impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on BIRADS categorization of mammographic non-mass findings. Methods: Prospective cohort for 180 women with mammographic non-mass findings who presented to Alexandria University Radio diagnosis Department either for screening or diagnostic purposes between July 2019 and August 2020 with mean age 51.44 +/- 10.67 . Digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound was done for all patients. Lesions were evaluated on DM; DBT alone then combined DBT & DM. Comparison of results according to changes in BIRADS, diagnostic performance using histopathology as gold standard. Results: 208 non-mass findings were detected by conventional mammography (104 asymmetry, 35 architectural distortion, 69 micro calcifications), Tomosynthesis reduced the BIRADS 3 count by 32%, upgraded the count of BIRADS 4 lesions by 11.4% while upgraded the BIRADS 2 by 18.9% with consequent improvement of sensitivity and specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy to 96%, 95%, 94%,97%, and 95.6%. Conclusion: Combined FFDM and DBT improved the diagnostic performance in evaluation of non-mass findings and proper BIRADS categorization.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 148
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The future of breast ultrasonography through non-mass lesions
    Uematsu, Takayoshi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASONICS, 2024, 51 (01) : 153 - 154
  • [32] Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images
    Skaane, Per
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Eben, Ellen B.
    Jebsen, Ingvild N.
    Krager, Mona
    Haakenaasen, Unni
    Ekseth, Ulrika
    Izadi, Mina
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Gullien, Randi
    RADIOLOGY, 2014, 271 (03) : 655 - 663
  • [33] Utility of Breast MRI for Further Evaluation of Equivocal Findings on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Niell, Bethany L.
    Bhatt, Kandarp
    Dang, Pragya
    Humphrey, Kathryn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (05) : 1171 - 1178
  • [34] Comment on the value of multiparametric MRI in breast non-mass lesions
    An, Yongyu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 163
  • [35] Unusual presentation of tubular breast carcinoma as non-mass enhancement
    Aydin, Hale
    Guner, Bahar
    Bostanci, Isil Esen
    Cosar, Zehra Sumru
    Kiziltepe, Fatma Tuba
    Aribas, Bilgin Kadri
    Bozdogan, Nazan
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 49 (01): : 281 - 283
  • [36] Advancing Breast Cancer Diagnosis: The Impact of Elastography Integration Into Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization
    Frimpong, George Asafu Adjaye
    Aboagye, Evans
    Asante, Emmanuel
    Owusu-Afriyie, Osei
    Bonsu, Ernest O.
    Mahama, Fairuuj
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [37] A comparison of the accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis with supplementary views in the diagnostic workup of mammographic lesions
    JC Morel
    A Iqbal
    C Peacock
    DR Evans
    RK Wasan
    R Rahim
    J Goligher
    MJ Michell
    Breast Cancer Research, 13
  • [38] Texture in digital breast tomosynthesis: A comparison between mammographic and tomographic characterization of parenchymal properties
    Kontos, Despina
    Bakic, Predrag R.
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 6915
  • [39] Mammographic features and screening outcome in a randomized controlled trial comparing digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography
    Aase, H. S.
    Danielsen, A. S.
    Hoff, S. R.
    Holen, A. S.
    Haldorsen, I. S.
    Hovda, T.
    Hanestad, B.
    Sandvik, C. K.
    Hofvind, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 141
  • [40] Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) as a standard mammographic investigation compared with Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) in a District General Hospital Symptomatic Breast Service
    Etheridge, Harriet
    Butler, Aisling
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 18