The impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on BIRADS categorization of mammographic non-mass findings

被引:0
|
作者
Fattah, Nadia Mohamed Ahmed Abdel [1 ]
Zahran, Mohamed H. [2 ]
Fawzy, Rawya K. [1 ]
Hamid, Alaa El Din M. Abdel [2 ]
Maghraby, Hala K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alexandria, Med Res Inst, Dept Radiodiag, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Radiodiag & Intervent, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] Univ Alexandria, Med Res Inst, Dept Pathol, Alexandria, Egypt
关键词
Breast cancer; Digital Breast Tomosynthesis; mammography; BIRADS; ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1080/20905068.2021.1916244
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Mammography is the most used breast screening tool and was proven to reduce breast-cancer-associated mortality. The estimated sensitivity of mammography varies between 77% and 95%; however, sensitivity could be 26% lower in dense breasts than in entirely fatty breasts. The ability to represent the complex 3D breast architecture and early changes in anatomical structures in a 2D view is the biggest challenge for mammography. In Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), tomographic images are reconstructed from multiple projections acquired from different angles. This technique allows the generation of 3D data, reduction of tissue overlap and allows better evaluation of masses, architectural distortion, and asymmetries compared with conventional two-dimensional mammographic images. Objective: To evaluate the impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on BIRADS categorization of mammographic non-mass findings. Methods: Prospective cohort for 180 women with mammographic non-mass findings who presented to Alexandria University Radio diagnosis Department either for screening or diagnostic purposes between July 2019 and August 2020 with mean age 51.44 +/- 10.67 . Digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound was done for all patients. Lesions were evaluated on DM; DBT alone then combined DBT & DM. Comparison of results according to changes in BIRADS, diagnostic performance using histopathology as gold standard. Results: 208 non-mass findings were detected by conventional mammography (104 asymmetry, 35 architectural distortion, 69 micro calcifications), Tomosynthesis reduced the BIRADS 3 count by 32%, upgraded the count of BIRADS 4 lesions by 11.4% while upgraded the BIRADS 2 by 18.9% with consequent improvement of sensitivity and specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy to 96%, 95%, 94%,97%, and 95.6%. Conclusion: Combined FFDM and DBT improved the diagnostic performance in evaluation of non-mass findings and proper BIRADS categorization.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 148
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparing Mammographic Density Assessed by Digital Breast Tomosynthesis or Digital Mammography: The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    Gard, Charlotte C.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    Ho, Thao-Quyen H.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 302 (02) : 286 - 292
  • [22] Classification of breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass lesions
    Gallego-Ortiz, Cristina
    Martel, Anne L.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2014, 9035
  • [23] Non-mass lesions on screening breast ultrasound
    Lee, Jihyun
    Lee, Jin Hwa
    Baik, Seonmi
    Cho, Eun
    Kim, Dong Won
    Kwon, Hee Jin
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2016, 18 (04) : 446 - 451
  • [24] Impact of angular range of digital breast tomosynthesis on mass detection in dense breasts
    Scaduto, David A.
    Huang, Hailiang
    Liu, Chunling
    Rinaldi, Kim
    Hebecker, Axel
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    Vogt, Sebastian
    Fisher, Paul
    Zhao, Wei
    14TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI 2018), 2018, 10718
  • [25] Classification of breast regions as mass and non-mass based on digital mammograms using taxonomic indexes and SVM
    Servulo de Oliveira, Fernando Soares
    de Carvalho Filho, Antonio Oseas
    Silva, Aristofanes Correa
    de Paiva, Anselmo Cardoso
    Gattass, Marcelo
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2015, 57 : 42 - 53
  • [26] A comparison of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the detection of microcalcifications by correlating mammographic and pathologic findings
    Farghadani, Maryam
    Ghadiri-faraz, Bahar
    Riahinezhad, Maryam
    Sarami, Sahar
    IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA PERSA, 2024, 10 (02):
  • [27] Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Automated Volumetric Software and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization by Expert Radiologists
    Damases, Christine N.
    Brennan, Patrick C.
    Mello-Thoms, Claudia
    McEntee, Mark F.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) : 70 - 77
  • [28] Mammographic Screening in Routine Practice: Multisite Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screenings
    Conant, Emily F.
    Talley, Melinda M.
    Parghi, Chirag R.
    Sheh, Bryant C.
    Liang, Su-Ying
    Pohlman, Scott
    Rane, Amey
    Jung, Yoojin
    Stevens, Lauren A. S.
    Paulus, Jessica K.
    Alsheik, Nila
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (03)
  • [29] The future of breast ultrasonography through non-mass lesions
    Takayoshi Uematsu
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2024, 51 : 153 - 154
  • [30] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Supplemental Diagnostic Mammographic Views for Evaluation of Noncalcified Breast Lesions
    Zuley, Margarita L.
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Ganott, Marie A.
    Sumkin, Jules H.
    Kelly, Amy E.
    Catullo, Victor J.
    Rathfon, Grace Y.
    Lu, Amy H.
    Gur, David
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (01) : 89 - 95