The impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on BIRADS categorization of mammographic non-mass findings

被引:0
|
作者
Fattah, Nadia Mohamed Ahmed Abdel [1 ]
Zahran, Mohamed H. [2 ]
Fawzy, Rawya K. [1 ]
Hamid, Alaa El Din M. Abdel [2 ]
Maghraby, Hala K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alexandria, Med Res Inst, Dept Radiodiag, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Radiodiag & Intervent, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] Univ Alexandria, Med Res Inst, Dept Pathol, Alexandria, Egypt
关键词
Breast cancer; Digital Breast Tomosynthesis; mammography; BIRADS; ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1080/20905068.2021.1916244
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Mammography is the most used breast screening tool and was proven to reduce breast-cancer-associated mortality. The estimated sensitivity of mammography varies between 77% and 95%; however, sensitivity could be 26% lower in dense breasts than in entirely fatty breasts. The ability to represent the complex 3D breast architecture and early changes in anatomical structures in a 2D view is the biggest challenge for mammography. In Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), tomographic images are reconstructed from multiple projections acquired from different angles. This technique allows the generation of 3D data, reduction of tissue overlap and allows better evaluation of masses, architectural distortion, and asymmetries compared with conventional two-dimensional mammographic images. Objective: To evaluate the impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on BIRADS categorization of mammographic non-mass findings. Methods: Prospective cohort for 180 women with mammographic non-mass findings who presented to Alexandria University Radio diagnosis Department either for screening or diagnostic purposes between July 2019 and August 2020 with mean age 51.44 +/- 10.67 . Digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound was done for all patients. Lesions were evaluated on DM; DBT alone then combined DBT & DM. Comparison of results according to changes in BIRADS, diagnostic performance using histopathology as gold standard. Results: 208 non-mass findings were detected by conventional mammography (104 asymmetry, 35 architectural distortion, 69 micro calcifications), Tomosynthesis reduced the BIRADS 3 count by 32%, upgraded the count of BIRADS 4 lesions by 11.4% while upgraded the BIRADS 2 by 18.9% with consequent improvement of sensitivity and specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy to 96%, 95%, 94%,97%, and 95.6%. Conclusion: Combined FFDM and DBT improved the diagnostic performance in evaluation of non-mass findings and proper BIRADS categorization.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 148
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings
    Andersson, Ingvar
    Ikeda, Debra M.
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    Ruschin, Mark
    Svahn, Tony
    Timberg, Pontus
    Tingberg, Anders
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (12) : 2817 - 2825
  • [2] Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings
    Ingvar Andersson
    Debra M. Ikeda
    Sophia Zackrisson
    Mark Ruschin
    Tony Svahn
    Pontus Timberg
    Anders Tingberg
    European Radiology, 2008, 18 : 2817 - 2825
  • [3] Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization
    Castillo-Garcia, Maria
    Chevalier, Margarita
    Garayoa, Julia
    Rodriguez-Ruiz, Alejandro
    Garcia-Pinto, Diego
    Valverde, Julio
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (07) : 802 - 810
  • [4] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Is Comparable to Mammographic Spot Views for Mass Characterization
    Noroozian, Mitra
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir
    Rahnama-Moghadam, Sahand
    Klein, Katherine A.
    Jeffries, Deborah O.
    Pinsky, Renee W.
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Carson, Paul L.
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Roubidoux, Marilyn A.
    RADIOLOGY, 2012, 262 (01) : 61 - 68
  • [5] Histopathology findings of non-mass cancers on breast ultrasound
    Kim, Hye Rin
    Jung, Hae Kyoung
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA OPEN, 2018, 7 (06):
  • [6] Non-mass findings on breast ultrasound: A challenge for the radiologist?
    Linck, Pierre-Antoine
    Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre
    Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine
    Chamming's, Foucauld
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2021, 31 (02) : 82 - 90
  • [7] Subtle findings on mammography and breast ultrasound (non-mass)
    Linck, Pierre-Antoine
    Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine
    Deleau, Florian
    Brocard, Clementine
    Gaillard, Anne-Lise
    Manse, Lea
    Raykova, Mariya
    Depetiteville, Marie-Pierre
    Chamming's, Foucauld
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2023, 33 (02) : 94 - 96
  • [8] Angular dependence of mammographic dosimeters in digital breast tomosynthesis
    Bradley, Lena R.
    Carton, Ann-Katherine
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2010, 7622
  • [9] Study of role of digital breast tomosynthesis over digital mammography in the assessment of BIRADS 3 breast lesions
    Engy A. Ali
    Lamiaa Adel
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 50
  • [10] Non-mass enhancement breast lesions: MRI findings and associations with malignancy
    Liu, Gang
    Li, Ying
    Chen, Si-Lu
    Chen, Qiao
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (06)