Difference between actual vs. pathology prostate weight in TURP and radical robotic-assisted prostatectomy specimen

被引:8
|
作者
Lukacs, Szilveszter [1 ]
Vale, Justin [1 ]
Mazaris, Evangelos [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, St Marys Hosp, London W2 1NY, England
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2014年 / 40卷 / 06期
关键词
Prostatectomy; Transurethral Resection of Prostate; Pathology; Prostate; Robotics; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; TISSUE-SHRINKAGE; VOLUME; ULTRASOUND; FIXATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.06.14
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: To investigate and highlight the effect of formaldehyde induced weight reduction in transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and radical robotically-assisted prostatectomy (RALP) specimen as a result of standard chemical fixation. Materials and Methods: 51 patients were recruited from January 2013 to June 2013 who either underwent a TURP (n= 26) or RALP (n= 25). Data was collected prospectively by the operating surgeon who measured the native, unfixed histology specimen directly after operation. The specimens were fixed in 10% Formaldehyde Solution BP and sent to the pathology laboratory where after sufficient fixation period was re-weighed. Results: Overall mean age 64.78 years, TURP mean age 68.31 years RALP mean age 61.12years. We found that the overall prostatic specimen (n= 51) weight loss after fixation was a mean of 11.20% (3.78 grams) (p <= 0.0001). Subgroup analysis of the native TURP chips mean weight was 16.15 grams and formalin treated mean weight was 14.00 grams (p <= 0.0001). Therefore, TURP chips had a mean of 13.32 % (2.15 grams) weight loss during chemical fixation. RALP subgroup unfixed specimen mean weight was 52.08 grams and formalin treated mean weight was 42.60 grams (p <= 0.0001), a 19.32 % (9.48grams) mean weight reduction. Conclusion: It has not been known that prostatic chips and whole human radical prostatectomy specimen undergo a significant weight reduction. The practical significance of the accurate prostate weight in patient management may be limited, however, it is agreed that this should be recorded correctly, as data is potential interest for research purposes and vital for precise documentation.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 827
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robotic-Assisted vs. Open Simple Prostatectomy for Large Prostates: A Meta-Analysis
    Xia, Zhongyou
    Li, Jinze
    Yang, Xiaoying
    Jing, Hao
    Niu, Chao
    Li, Xianhui
    Li, Yunxiang
    Zhang, Zongping
    Wu, Ji
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [32] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for preoperatively suspicious prostate cancer patients - is a novel indication for robotic surgery?
    Weng, Wei-Chun
    Ou, Yen-Chuan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 : 16 - 16
  • [33] Functional and perioperative outcomes in elderly men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Samer L. Traboulsi
    David-Dan Nguyen
    Ahmed S. Zakaria
    Kyle W. Law
    Hanna Shahine
    Malek Meskawi
    Cristina Negrean
    Pierre I. Karakiewicz
    Assaad El Hakim
    Kevin C. Zorn
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 2791 - 2798
  • [34] Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for the Treatment of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Allan, Christie
    Ilic, Dragan
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 96 (04) : 373 - 378
  • [35] Anterior retraction of the prostate during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using the closure device
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Agarwal, Dinesh
    Costello, Anthony J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (04) : 558 - 562
  • [36] Surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with previous transurethral resection of the prostate
    Chen, Sih-Han
    Wu, Chun-Hsien
    Wu, Richard Chen-Yu
    Kuo, Wade Wei-Ting
    Lee, Yen-Hsi
    Li, Ryh-Chyr
    Lin, Yung-Yao
    Lin, Victor Chia-Hsiang
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 31 (06) : 267 - 272
  • [37] Prostate Cancer With Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy-based Case Series
    Goldenthal, Steven B.
    Reimers, Melissa A.
    Singhal, Udit
    Farha, Mark
    Mehra, Rohit
    Piert, Morand
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Modi, Parth K.
    Curci, Nicole
    Peabody, James
    Kleer, Eduardo
    Smith, David C.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    UROLOGY, 2022, 167 : 171 - 178
  • [38] Functional and perioperative outcomes in elderly men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Traboulsi, Samer L.
    Nguyen, David-Dan
    Zakaria, Ahmed S.
    Law, Kyle W.
    Shahine, Hanna
    Meskawi, Malek
    Negrean, Cristina
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    El Hakim, Assaad
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (11) : 2791 - 2798
  • [39] Differences in long-term continence rates between prostate cancer patients with extraprostatic vs. organ-confined disease undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: An observational studys
    Garcia, Cristina Cano
    Wenzel, Mike
    Koll, Florestan
    Zatik, Agnes
    Koellermann, Jens
    Graefen, Markus
    Tilki, Derya
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Kluth, Luis A.
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Mandel, Philipp
    Hoeh, Benedikt
    CLINICS, 2023, 78
  • [40] IMPACT OF PROSTATE WEIGHT ON ROBOTIC-ASSISTED PROSTATECTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND OUTCOMES: SINGLE-SURGEON SERIES
    De Francesco, Piergustavo
    Ghahhari, Jamil
    Rizzoli, Ambra
    Cini, Chiara
    Castellucci, Roberto
    Castellan, Pietro
    Berardinelli, Francesco
    Cindolo, Luca
    Schips, Luigi
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (04) : 2090 - 2091