Difference between actual vs. pathology prostate weight in TURP and radical robotic-assisted prostatectomy specimen

被引:8
|
作者
Lukacs, Szilveszter [1 ]
Vale, Justin [1 ]
Mazaris, Evangelos [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, St Marys Hosp, London W2 1NY, England
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2014年 / 40卷 / 06期
关键词
Prostatectomy; Transurethral Resection of Prostate; Pathology; Prostate; Robotics; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; TISSUE-SHRINKAGE; VOLUME; ULTRASOUND; FIXATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.06.14
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: To investigate and highlight the effect of formaldehyde induced weight reduction in transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and radical robotically-assisted prostatectomy (RALP) specimen as a result of standard chemical fixation. Materials and Methods: 51 patients were recruited from January 2013 to June 2013 who either underwent a TURP (n= 26) or RALP (n= 25). Data was collected prospectively by the operating surgeon who measured the native, unfixed histology specimen directly after operation. The specimens were fixed in 10% Formaldehyde Solution BP and sent to the pathology laboratory where after sufficient fixation period was re-weighed. Results: Overall mean age 64.78 years, TURP mean age 68.31 years RALP mean age 61.12years. We found that the overall prostatic specimen (n= 51) weight loss after fixation was a mean of 11.20% (3.78 grams) (p <= 0.0001). Subgroup analysis of the native TURP chips mean weight was 16.15 grams and formalin treated mean weight was 14.00 grams (p <= 0.0001). Therefore, TURP chips had a mean of 13.32 % (2.15 grams) weight loss during chemical fixation. RALP subgroup unfixed specimen mean weight was 52.08 grams and formalin treated mean weight was 42.60 grams (p <= 0.0001), a 19.32 % (9.48grams) mean weight reduction. Conclusion: It has not been known that prostatic chips and whole human radical prostatectomy specimen undergo a significant weight reduction. The practical significance of the accurate prostate weight in patient management may be limited, however, it is agreed that this should be recorded correctly, as data is potential interest for research purposes and vital for precise documentation.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 827
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy) and radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Guru, KA
    Bhandari, A
    Peabody, J
    Oja-Tebbe, N
    Kaul, S
    Dasari, S
    Tewari, A
    Menon, M
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 43 - 44
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer in the UK
    Labban, Muhieddine
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Song, Chao
    Becker, Russell
    Li, Yanli
    Kreaden, Usha Seshadri
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (04) : E225740
  • [23] Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer
    Ilic, Dragan
    Evans, Sue M.
    Allan, Christie Ann
    Jung, Jae Hung
    Murphy, Declan
    Frydenberg, Mark
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (09):
  • [24] SUPER-EXTENDED ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Brook, Nicholas
    Turri, Filippo
    Larcher, Alessandro
    Dias, Brendan
    Banerjee, Indraneel
    D'Hondt, Frederiek
    Schatteman, Peter
    De Naeyer, Geert
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E1120 - E1120
  • [25] Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence Rates After Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Ginzburg, Serge
    Nevers, Thomas
    Staff, Ilene
    Tortora, Joseph
    Champagne, Alison
    Kesler, Stuart S.
    Laudone, Vincent P.
    Wagner, Joseph R.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2012, 16 (03) : 443 - 450
  • [26] Anterior vs. Retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: can the approach really make a difference?
    Albisinni, Simone
    Dasnoy, Cyrielle
    Diamand, Romain
    Mjaess, Georges
    Aoun, Fouad
    Esperto, Francesco
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Roumeguere, Thierry
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 74 (02): : 137 - 145
  • [27] Comparison of transfusion requirements between open and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Kordan, Yakup
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Altamar, Hernan O.
    Clark, Peter E.
    Chang, Sam S.
    Davis, Rodney
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Baumgartner, Roxy
    Mishra, Vineet
    Chan, Robert C.
    Smith, Joseph A., Jr.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (07) : 1036 - 1040
  • [29] Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Differential Outcomes in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate vs. Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy
    Khanmammadova, Narmina
    Jiang, James F.
    Gomez, Ralph Kevin Medina
    Gao, Ashley
    Chu, Timothy Young
    Shahait, Mohammed
    Myklak, Kristene
    Lee, David I.
    Das, Akhil K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (17)
  • [30] A CALL TO ARMS: The Case for MRI-Assisted Radiosurgery (MARS) vs. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy or Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Frank, Steven J.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2023, 22 (01) : 12 - 14