Difference between actual vs. pathology prostate weight in TURP and radical robotic-assisted prostatectomy specimen

被引:8
|
作者
Lukacs, Szilveszter [1 ]
Vale, Justin [1 ]
Mazaris, Evangelos [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, St Marys Hosp, London W2 1NY, England
来源
INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL | 2014年 / 40卷 / 06期
关键词
Prostatectomy; Transurethral Resection of Prostate; Pathology; Prostate; Robotics; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; TISSUE-SHRINKAGE; VOLUME; ULTRASOUND; FIXATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.06.14
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: To investigate and highlight the effect of formaldehyde induced weight reduction in transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and radical robotically-assisted prostatectomy (RALP) specimen as a result of standard chemical fixation. Materials and Methods: 51 patients were recruited from January 2013 to June 2013 who either underwent a TURP (n= 26) or RALP (n= 25). Data was collected prospectively by the operating surgeon who measured the native, unfixed histology specimen directly after operation. The specimens were fixed in 10% Formaldehyde Solution BP and sent to the pathology laboratory where after sufficient fixation period was re-weighed. Results: Overall mean age 64.78 years, TURP mean age 68.31 years RALP mean age 61.12years. We found that the overall prostatic specimen (n= 51) weight loss after fixation was a mean of 11.20% (3.78 grams) (p <= 0.0001). Subgroup analysis of the native TURP chips mean weight was 16.15 grams and formalin treated mean weight was 14.00 grams (p <= 0.0001). Therefore, TURP chips had a mean of 13.32 % (2.15 grams) weight loss during chemical fixation. RALP subgroup unfixed specimen mean weight was 52.08 grams and formalin treated mean weight was 42.60 grams (p <= 0.0001), a 19.32 % (9.48grams) mean weight reduction. Conclusion: It has not been known that prostatic chips and whole human radical prostatectomy specimen undergo a significant weight reduction. The practical significance of the accurate prostate weight in patient management may be limited, however, it is agreed that this should be recorded correctly, as data is potential interest for research purposes and vital for precise documentation.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 827
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy: When can we stop the debate?
    Lavery, Hugh J.
    Levinson, Adam W.
    Samadi, David B.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2012, 30 (05) : 549 - 552
  • [2] Robotic-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy: an update to the never-ending debate
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Tilki, Derya
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 : S120 - S123
  • [3] The Association between Specimen Neuromuscular Characteristics and Urinary Incontinence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Bashi, Tomer
    Margalioth, Jonathan
    Savin, Ziv
    Marom, Ron
    Dekalo, Snir
    Fahoum, Ibrahim
    Naamneh, Rabab
    Mano, Roy
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (18)
  • [4] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in men with a pathological prostate weight &gt;100 g
    O'Meara, S.
    Riogh, Au Nic An
    Lundon, D.
    O'Malley, K. J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 : 50 - 51
  • [5] ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC VS. OPEN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Ritch, Chad
    Barocas, Daniel
    You, Chaochen
    May, Alexandra
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Clark, Peter
    Penson, David
    Chang, Sam
    Cookson, Michael
    Smith, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E396 - E396
  • [6] The impact of minimally invasive technology on localized prostate cancer practice patterns at a single institution: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy vs. radiation therapy vs. cryosurgery
    Munver, R.
    Disick, Grant I. S.
    Kesler, Stuart S.
    Gejerman, Glen
    Sawczuk, Ihor S.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A92 - A93
  • [7] Open vs. robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon and pathologist comparison of pathologic and oncologic outcomes
    Masterson, Timothy A.
    Cheng, Liang
    Boris, Ronald S.
    Koch, Michael O.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (07) : 1043 - 1048
  • [8] Clinically localized Prostate Cancer: Retzius-sparing vs. retropubic robotic-assisted laparoscopic Prostatectomy
    Kunath, Frank
    Bellut, L.
    Apel, H.
    UROLOGIE, 2022, 61 (03): : 297 - 300
  • [9] Clinically localized prostate cancer: Retzius-sparing vs. retropubic robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Kunath, Frank
    Bellut, L.
    Apel, H.
    UROLOGE, 2022, 61 (03): : 297 - 300
  • [10] Does type of robotic platform make a difference in the final cost of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Marcio Covas Moschovas
    Talia Helman
    Seetharam Bhat
    Marco Sandri
    Travis Rogers
    Jonathan Noel
    Sunil Reddy
    Cathy Corder
    Vipul Patel
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 1329 - 1335