Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly: safety and outcomes

被引:7
|
作者
Sato, Hirotaka [1 ]
Abe, Hirokazu [2 ]
Ikeda, Atsushi [3 ]
Miyagawa, Tomoaki [4 ]
Sato, Katsuhiko [5 ]
Tsukada, Sachiyuki [6 ]
机构
[1] Hokusuikai Kinen Hosp, Dept Urol, 3-2-1 Higashihara Cyo, Mito, Ibaraki 3100035, Japan
[2] Kameda Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Chiba, Japan
[3] Univ Tsukuba Hosp, Dept Urol, Ibaraki, Japan
[4] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Urol, Saitama Med Ctr, Saitama, Japan
[5] Eastern Oomiya Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Saitama, Japan
[6] Hokusuikai Kinen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
Elderly; minimally invasive surgery; perioperative morbidity; laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy; anatomical correction rate; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; UROGYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; WOMEN; TERMINOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; MORBIDITY; COHORT; AGE;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2020.1867968
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Due to its low postoperative complication rate, vaginal surgery is the preferred intervention for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in elderly patients. We aimed to assess outcomes and perioperative complication rates associated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in elderly women. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 74 consecutive patients [52 (70.3%) aged <75 years; 22 (29.7%) aged >= 75 years] with POP who underwent LSC between August 2015 and December 2017. We evaluated preoperative risks using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and complications, using the Clavien-Dindo grading (CDG). No between-group differences were observed in CCI. CDG indicated fewer perioperative complications in patients aged >75 years. Anatomical success rates at 15 months were 95.5% and 90.4% in patients aged >= 75 and <75 years, respectively. LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age. Thus, the appropriate surgical intervention method would depend on the patient's health and comorbidities. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is a superior method to vaginal surgery because of its anatomical and functional outcomes, particularly regarding sexual activity. What do the results of this study add? In this single-center study with a 15-month follow-up, we demonstrated that LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age at the time of surgery. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the >= 75 and <75 years groups. Thus, LSC may be considered for women aged >75 years. However, in these elderly patients, the surgical method should be determined according to their health status and medical comorbidities. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Age should not be the basis for exclusion from laparoscopic procedures. Moreover, LSC is a suitable and valid option for elderly women with POP. As the study population consisted of a homogenous group of Japanese women, it lacks generalisability. Studies evaluating these outcomes are required in other populations.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 115
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: Laparoscopic or vaginal sacrocolpopexy?
    Descargues, G.
    Collard, P.
    Grise, P.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2008, 36 (10): : 978 - 983
  • [32] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus transvaginal mesh for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse
    Iglesia, Cheryl B.
    Hale, Douglass S.
    Lucente, Vincent R.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (03) : 363 - 370
  • [33] Lower urinary tract function improves after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for elderly patients with pelvic organ prolapse
    Togo, Mio
    Kitta, Takeya
    Kanno, Yukiko
    Ouchi, Mifuka
    Tokiwa, Shino
    Huang, Tingwen
    Moriyama, Shingo
    Nomura, Jimmy
    Moriya, Kimihiko
    Shinohara, Nobuo
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2020, 12 (03) : 260 - 265
  • [34] Outcomes of Pregnancy and Recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy with Uterine Preservation: A Case Series
    Alsahabi, J.
    Alsary, S.
    Balharith, M.
    Bamanie, E.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 34 : S54 - S54
  • [35] Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: quality of life outcomes
    Vollstedt, Annah
    Meeks, William
    Triaca, Veronica
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2019, 11 : 1 - 9
  • [36] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for stage III pelvic organ prolapse
    Louis-Sylvestre, Christine
    Herry, Martine
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (05) : 731 - 733
  • [37] Vaginal assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (VALS) for gals with advanced pelvic organ prolapse
    Welch, E.
    Dengler, K.
    Gisseman, J.
    Gruber, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (04) : S1284 - S1285
  • [38] Novel hybrid laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse with a severe paravaginal defect
    Ichikawa, Masao
    Akira, Shigeo
    Mine, Katsuya
    Ohuchi, Nozomi
    Kurose, Keisuke
    Takeshita, Toshiyuki
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 39 (02) : 603 - 607
  • [39] Mini-laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical and posterior female pelvic organ prolapse
    Blaganje, Mija
    Lutfallah, Fouad
    Deval, Bruno
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (07) : 1117 - 1119
  • [40] BLADDER OUTLET OBSTRUCTION AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY FOR ADVANCED PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE
    Illiano, Ester
    Trama, Francesco
    Fabi, Consuelo
    Marchesi, Alessandro
    Natale, Franca
    Costantini, Elisabetta
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2021, 40 : S28 - S29