Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly: safety and outcomes

被引:7
|
作者
Sato, Hirotaka [1 ]
Abe, Hirokazu [2 ]
Ikeda, Atsushi [3 ]
Miyagawa, Tomoaki [4 ]
Sato, Katsuhiko [5 ]
Tsukada, Sachiyuki [6 ]
机构
[1] Hokusuikai Kinen Hosp, Dept Urol, 3-2-1 Higashihara Cyo, Mito, Ibaraki 3100035, Japan
[2] Kameda Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Chiba, Japan
[3] Univ Tsukuba Hosp, Dept Urol, Ibaraki, Japan
[4] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Urol, Saitama Med Ctr, Saitama, Japan
[5] Eastern Oomiya Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Saitama, Japan
[6] Hokusuikai Kinen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Ibaraki, Japan
关键词
Elderly; minimally invasive surgery; perioperative morbidity; laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy; anatomical correction rate; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; UROGYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; WOMEN; TERMINOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; MORBIDITY; COHORT; AGE;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2020.1867968
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Due to its low postoperative complication rate, vaginal surgery is the preferred intervention for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in elderly patients. We aimed to assess outcomes and perioperative complication rates associated with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) in elderly women. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 74 consecutive patients [52 (70.3%) aged <75 years; 22 (29.7%) aged >= 75 years] with POP who underwent LSC between August 2015 and December 2017. We evaluated preoperative risks using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and complications, using the Clavien-Dindo grading (CDG). No between-group differences were observed in CCI. CDG indicated fewer perioperative complications in patients aged >75 years. Anatomical success rates at 15 months were 95.5% and 90.4% in patients aged >= 75 and <75 years, respectively. LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age. Thus, the appropriate surgical intervention method would depend on the patient's health and comorbidities. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is a superior method to vaginal surgery because of its anatomical and functional outcomes, particularly regarding sexual activity. What do the results of this study add? In this single-center study with a 15-month follow-up, we demonstrated that LSC has a high anatomical correction rate and few perioperative complications regardless of age at the time of surgery. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the >= 75 and <75 years groups. Thus, LSC may be considered for women aged >75 years. However, in these elderly patients, the surgical method should be determined according to their health status and medical comorbidities. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Age should not be the basis for exclusion from laparoscopic procedures. Moreover, LSC is a suitable and valid option for elderly women with POP. As the study population consisted of a homogenous group of Japanese women, it lacks generalisability. Studies evaluating these outcomes are required in other populations.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 115
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus pelvic organ prolapse suspension for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study
    Tagliaferri, Valeria
    Taccaliti, Chiara
    Romano, Federico
    D'Asta, Marco
    Martulli, Bruno
    Gentile, Cosimo
    Legge, Francesco
    Ruggieri, Stefania
    Guido, Maurizio
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 42 (06) : 2075 - 2081
  • [22] Autologous fascia sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: safety and short-term outcomes
    Oliver, Janine
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2020, 39 : S281 - S281
  • [23] Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse
    Ke Pan
    Lili Cao
    Nicholas A. Ryan
    Yanzhou Wang
    Huicheng Xu
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2016, 27 : 93 - 101
  • [24] Variation of repeat sacrocolpopexy in women with recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
    Studer, A.
    Fahnle, I
    Christmann, C.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 1) : S122 - S122
  • [25] Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse
    Pan, Ke
    Cao, Lili
    Ryan, Nicholas A.
    Wang, Yanzhou
    Xu, Huicheng
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (01) : 93 - 101
  • [26] Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy as Management for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Kramer, Brandan A.
    Whelan, Christopher M.
    Powell, Timothy M.
    Schwartz, Bradley F.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (04) : 655 - 658
  • [27] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
    Campagna, G.
    Panico, G.
    Caramazza, D.
    Gallucci, V.
    Pizzacalla, S.
    Ercoli, A.
    Scambia, G.
    Parello, A.
    Ratto, C.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 23 (02) : 179 - 181
  • [28] Supracervical Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Benson, Aaron D.
    Kramer, Brandon A.
    Wayment, Robert O.
    Schwartz, Bradley F.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2010, 14 (04) : 525 - 530
  • [29] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus transvaginal mesh for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse
    Cheryl B. Iglesia
    Douglass S. Hale
    Vincent R. Lucente
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2013, 24 : 363 - 370
  • [30] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse
    G. Campagna
    G. Panico
    D. Caramazza
    V. Gallucci
    S. Pizzacalla
    A. Ercoli
    G. Scambia
    A. Parello
    C. Ratto
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2019, 23 : 179 - 181