Speaking but not gesturing predicts event memory: a cross-linguistic comparison

被引:5
|
作者
ter Bekke, Marlijn [1 ,2 ]
Ozyurek, Asli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Unal, Ercenur [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Language Studies, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Ozyegin Univ, Istanbul, Turkey
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
motion events; event cognition; event memory; cross-linguistic differences; co-speech gesture; multimodality; Turkish; Dutch; MOTION EVENTS; LANGUAGE; SPEECH; ENGLISH; MANNER; REPRESENTATION; COGNITION; CHILDREN; EYE;
D O I
10.1017/langcog.2022.3
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Every day people see, describe, and remember motion events. However, the relation between multimodal encoding of motion events in speech and gesture, and memory is not yet fully understood. Moreover, whether language typology modulates this relation remains to be tested. This study investigates whether the type of motion event information (path or manner) mentioned in speech and gesture predicts which information is remembered and whether this varies across speakers of typologically different languages. Dutch- and Turkish-speakers watched and described motion events and completed a surprise recognition memory task. For both Dutch- and Turkish-speakers, manner memory was at chance level. Participants who mentioned path in speech during encoding were more accurate at detecting changes to the path in the memory task. The relation between mentioning path in speech and path memory did not vary cross-linguistically. Finally, the co-speech gesture did not predict memory above mentioning path in speech. These findings suggest that how speakers describe a motion event in speech is more important than the typology of the speakers' native language in predicting motion event memory. The motion event videos are available for download for future research at https://osf.io/p8cas/.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 384
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Subject/object drop in the acquisition of Korean: A cross-linguistic comparison
    Kim, YJ
    JOURNAL OF EAST ASIAN LINGUISTICS, 2000, 9 (04) : 325 - 351
  • [43] Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison - Biber,D
    Stein, D
    LINGUISTICS, 1997, 35 (05) : 952 - 958
  • [44] Latvian CDI: methodology, developmental trends, and cross-linguistic comparison
    Urek, Olga
    Vulane, Anna
    Dargis, Roberts
    Taurina, Agrita
    Zirina, Tija
    Simonsen, Hanne Gram
    JOURNAL OF BALTIC STUDIES, 2019, 50 (03) : 285 - 305
  • [45] Subject/Object Drop in the Acquisition of Korean: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison
    Young-Joo Kim
    Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2000, 9 : 325 - 351
  • [46] A cross-linguistic comparison of category and letter fluency: Mandarin and English
    Eng, Nancy
    Vonk, Jet M. J.
    Salzberger, Melissa
    Yoo, Nakyung
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 72 (03): : 651 - 660
  • [47] A cross-linguistic comparison of generic noun phrases in English and Mandarin
    Gelman, SA
    Tardif, T
    COGNITION, 1998, 66 (03) : 215 - 248
  • [48] A cross-linguistic comparison of reference across five signed languages
    Ferrara, Lindsay
    Anible, Benjamin
    Hodge, Gabrielle
    Jantunen, Tommi
    Leeson, Lorraine
    Mesch, Johanna
    Nilsson, Anna-Lena
    LINGUISTIC TYPOLOGY, 2023, 27 (03) : 591 - 627