Evolving green building: triple bottom line or regenerative design?

被引:95
|
作者
Gou, Zhonghua [1 ]
Xie, Xiaohuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Environm Architecture, Urban Res Programme, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
Green building; Triple bottom line; Regenerative design; Sustainability; LEED; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; SYSTEMS; TOOLS; CRITERIA; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.077
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The research aims to envision the next generation green building. It starts from a critical review of green building concepts and practices. The critiques mainly come from two perspectives: one is triple bottom line and the other is regenerative design, which require that green building should take a holistic approach to sustainability as well as raise its benchmark. Revisiting green building rating systems (such as LEED), the article found that the green building concept and framework is being evolved to embrace sustainability critiques not in a way of bringing in more ambiguous, complicate indicators but through leverage, linkage and contextualization. This article also argues that the rhetoric debate on triple bottom line and regenerative design does not help to push forward building practices towards more sustainable built environments. It is more important to evolve the current engineering approach (thermal insulation and efficiency) to benchmarking and measuring building performance. An ecological approach (thermal dissipation and filtration) is anticipated for next generation green building practices. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 607
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Triple bottom line: sustainability in amblyopia care
    R Thomas
    L Brocklesby
    A Coleman
    V Cuchhadia
    D Dunham
    S Glaze
    P Khandelwal
    A Dahlmann-Noor
    [J]. Eye, 2016, 30 : 1029 - 1030
  • [42] People with disabilities in the era of the "triple bottom line"
    Shaddock, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 2003, 28 (01): : 90 - 93
  • [43] Circular Economy and the triple bottom line in Norway
    Wiebe K.S.
    Norstebø V.S.
    Aponte F.R.
    Simas M.S.
    Andersen T.
    Perez-Valdes G.A.
    [J]. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2023, 3 (1): : 1 - 33
  • [44] METHODOLOGICAL PITFALLS OF THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE CONCEPT
    Lacny, Martin
    [J]. AKTUALNE PROBLEMY PODNIKOVEJ SFERY 2013, 2013, : 309 - 314
  • [45] A Crooked Stool: The Rhetoric of the Triple Bottom Line
    House, Richard
    Livingston, Jessica
    Minster, Mark
    Taylor, Corey
    Watt, Anneliese
    [J]. 2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (IPCC), 2011,
  • [46] Triple bottom line: sustainability in amblyopia care
    Thomas, R.
    Brocklesby, L.
    Coleman, A.
    Cuchhadia, V.
    Dunham, D.
    Glaze, S.
    Khandelwal, P.
    Dahlmann-Noor, A.
    [J]. EYE, 2016, 30 (08) : 1029 - 1030
  • [47] Operationalizing triple bottom line harvest strategies
    Dichmont, Catherine M.
    Dowling, Natalie A.
    Pascoe, Sean
    Cannard, Toni
    Pears, Rachel J.
    Breen, Sian
    Roberts, Tom
    Leigh, George M.
    Mangel, Marc
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2021, 78 (02) : 731 - 742
  • [48] Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line
    Gimenez, Cristina
    Sierra, Vicenta
    Rodon, Juan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 140 (01) : 149 - 159
  • [49] The triple bottom line: Implications for the oil industry
    Elkington, J
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1999, 97 (50) : 139 - 141
  • [50] CSR AND THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE: THE ROLE OF NGOs
    Jahdi, Khosro S.
    [J]. GURUKUL BUSINESS REVIEW-GBR, 2012, 8 : 45 - 50