Evolving green building: triple bottom line or regenerative design?

被引:95
|
作者
Gou, Zhonghua [1 ]
Xie, Xiaohuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Environm Architecture, Urban Res Programme, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
Green building; Triple bottom line; Regenerative design; Sustainability; LEED; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; SYSTEMS; TOOLS; CRITERIA; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.077
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The research aims to envision the next generation green building. It starts from a critical review of green building concepts and practices. The critiques mainly come from two perspectives: one is triple bottom line and the other is regenerative design, which require that green building should take a holistic approach to sustainability as well as raise its benchmark. Revisiting green building rating systems (such as LEED), the article found that the green building concept and framework is being evolved to embrace sustainability critiques not in a way of bringing in more ambiguous, complicate indicators but through leverage, linkage and contextualization. This article also argues that the rhetoric debate on triple bottom line and regenerative design does not help to push forward building practices towards more sustainable built environments. It is more important to evolve the current engineering approach (thermal insulation and efficiency) to benchmarking and measuring building performance. An ecological approach (thermal dissipation and filtration) is anticipated for next generation green building practices. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 607
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Green Purchasing: Capabilities, Practices and Effects on Firms' Triple Bottom Line Performance
    Foo, Meow Yee
    Kanapathy, Kanagi
    Zailani, Suhaiza
    Shaharudin, Mohd Rizaimy
    [J]. ESTUDIOS DE ECONOMIA APLICADA, 2021, 39 (03):
  • [22] Design for sustainable ship dismantling based on triple bottom line perspective
    Ozturkoglu, Yucel
    Kazancoglu, Yigit
    Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2022, 14 (03) : 238 - 265
  • [23] Sustainability in casino design and operation: "green" is good for the bottom line
    Sykes, Krista
    Gaffney, Chaser
    Sykes, Tom
    Posner, Israel
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 9 (01): : 64 - 72
  • [24] Translating triple top line strategy into triple bottom line performance
    Edgeman, Rick
    Eskildsen, Jacob
    Neely, Andy
    [J]. MEASURING BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2015, 19 (01)
  • [25] BALANCING THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE: BUILDING A CREDIBLE AND FUNDABLE SMART GRID BUSINESS CASE
    Sarfi, Robert J.
    Lee, Ken
    Gemoets, Leopoldo A.
    [J]. ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY VIII, 2017, 224 : 3 - 14
  • [26] Research on Green Innovation Efficiency of ListedChinese Energy Companies Based on Triple Bottom Line
    Song, Zhimin
    Zhang, Na
    [J]. COMPLEXITY, 2020, 2020
  • [27] Green purchasing capabilities and practices towards Firm's triple bottom line in Malaysia
    Yee, Foo Meow
    Shaharudin, Mohd Rizaimy
    Ma, Guoxin
    Zailani, Suhaiza Hanim Mohamad
    Kanapathy, Kanagi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 307
  • [28] Triple bottom line - a vaulting ambition?
    Tullberg, Jan
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2012, 21 (03) : 310 - 324
  • [29] A "Triple Bottom Line" approach to QRA
    Cavanagh, Nic
    Hickey, Colin
    [J]. CISAP5: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT IN PROCESS & POWER INDUSTRY, PT 1, 2012, 26 : 165 - 170
  • [30] Corporate responsibility and the triple bottom line
    John A. Glaser
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2006, 8 (4) : 225 - 228