Elicitation of preferences of Dutch broiler and pig farmers to support decision making on animal welfare

被引:9
|
作者
Gocsik, Eva [1 ]
van der Lans, Ivo A. [2 ]
Lansink, Alfons G. J. M. Oude [1 ]
Saatkamp, Helmut W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Business Econ Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Conjoint analysis; Farming systems; Broiler production; Pig production; Preferences; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.njas.2015.11.006
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Conjoint analysis was conducted to elicit Dutch broiler and fattening pig farmers' preferences about different characteristics of production systems, with primary interest in farmers' intrinsic motivation towards animal welfare (AW). A cluster analysis was carried out to identify distinct groups of farmers with homogeneous preferences. The results showed that farmers preferred conventional practices and had negative preferences towards free-range systems. Two clusters of broiler farmers were distinguished. The 'Free-range opposed' cluster evaluated a production system by focusing on a single aspect, the provision of free-range access, while the 'Multi-attribute focused' cluster included multiple attributes in their evaluation. In the case of fattening pig farmers, no clusters could be identified. Results showed that farmers do not have a strong intrinsic motivation to switch to a system with higher animal welfare standards. It is therefore likely that the level of on-farm AW will be determined by external and farm-specific factors, and that higher levels of AW will only be achieved if these factors are favorable for the adoption of these production systems. (C) 2015 Royal Netherlands Society for Agricultural Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 86
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A decision support model for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic preferences relations
    Feifei Jin
    Zhiwei Ni
    Lidan Pei
    Huayou Chen
    Yaping Li
    Xuhui Zhu
    Liping Ni
    [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2019, 31 : 1103 - 1124
  • [42] Reviewing model application to support animal health decision making
    Singer, Alexander
    Salman, Mo
    Thulke, Hans-Hermann
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2011, 99 (01) : 60 - 67
  • [43] Improving Representation of Decision Rules in LUCC-ABM: An Example with an Elicitation of Farmers' Decision Making for Landscape Restoration in Central Malawi
    Djenontin, Ida Nadia S.
    Zulu, Leo C.
    Ligmann-Zielinska, Arika
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (13)
  • [44] Shared decision making in cancer treatment: A Dutch national survey on patients' preferences and perceptions
    Kuijpers, Marieke M. T.
    van Veenendaal, Haske
    Engelen, Vivian
    Visserman, Ella
    Noteboom, Eveline A.
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    May, Anne M.
    de Wit, Niek
    van der Wall, Elsken
    Helsper, Charles W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (01)
  • [45] Models in animal collective decision-making: information uncertainty and conflicting preferences
    Conradt, Larissa
    [J]. INTERFACE FOCUS, 2012, 2 (02) : 226 - 240
  • [46] Information efficient learning of complexly structured preferences: Elicitation procedures and their application to decision making under uncertainty
    Jansen, C.
    Blocher, H.
    Augustin, T.
    Schollmeyer, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2022, 144 : 69 - 91
  • [47] Normative contestation in transitions 'in the making': Animal welfare concerns and system innovation in pig husbandry
    Elzen, Boelie
    Geels, Frank W.
    Leeuwis, Cees
    van Mierlo, Barbara
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (02) : 263 - 275
  • [48] Information efficient learning of complexly structured preferences: Elicitation procedures and their application to decision making under uncertainty
    Jansen, Christoph
    Blocher, Hannah
    Augustin, Thomas
    Schollmeyer, Georg
    [J]. arXiv, 2021,
  • [49] Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools
    Robinson, A
    Thomson, R
    [J]. QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 10 : I34 - I38
  • [50] Support amongst UK pig farmers and agricultural stakeholders for the use of food losses in animal feed
    zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K. H. J.
    Kelly, Moira
    Bladon, Eleanor
    Salemdeeb, Ramy
    Balmford, Andrew
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):