Elicitation of preferences of Dutch broiler and pig farmers to support decision making on animal welfare

被引:9
|
作者
Gocsik, Eva [1 ]
van der Lans, Ivo A. [2 ]
Lansink, Alfons G. J. M. Oude [1 ]
Saatkamp, Helmut W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Business Econ Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Conjoint analysis; Farming systems; Broiler production; Pig production; Preferences; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.njas.2015.11.006
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Conjoint analysis was conducted to elicit Dutch broiler and fattening pig farmers' preferences about different characteristics of production systems, with primary interest in farmers' intrinsic motivation towards animal welfare (AW). A cluster analysis was carried out to identify distinct groups of farmers with homogeneous preferences. The results showed that farmers preferred conventional practices and had negative preferences towards free-range systems. Two clusters of broiler farmers were distinguished. The 'Free-range opposed' cluster evaluated a production system by focusing on a single aspect, the provision of free-range access, while the 'Multi-attribute focused' cluster included multiple attributes in their evaluation. In the case of fattening pig farmers, no clusters could be identified. Results showed that farmers do not have a strong intrinsic motivation to switch to a system with higher animal welfare standards. It is therefore likely that the level of on-farm AW will be determined by external and farm-specific factors, and that higher levels of AW will only be achieved if these factors are favorable for the adoption of these production systems. (C) 2015 Royal Netherlands Society for Agricultural Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 86
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] BVA's animal welfare strategy: a framework for decision making
    不详
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 2015, 177 (06) : 143 - 143
  • [32] Development of a decision support system to assess farm animal welfare
    Bracke, MBM
    Metz, JHM
    Spruijt, BM
    [J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2001, 51 : 17 - 20
  • [33] A Survey of Broiler Farmers' Perceptions of Animal Welfare and their Technical Efficiency: A Case Study in Northeast China
    Jo, Hyeonsoo
    Nasrullah, Muhammad
    Jiang, Bing
    Li, Xiang
    Bao, Jun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2022, 25 (03) : 275 - 286
  • [34] Discrepancies between farmers' perceptions and actual animal welfare conditions on commercial pig farms
    Nadlucnik, Eva
    Golinar Oven, Irena
    Tomazic, Iztok
    Plut, Jan
    Dovc, Alenka
    Stukelj, Marina
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [35] Pig Farmers' Preferences for the Adoption of Good Animal Husbandry Practices in Vietnam: A Choice Experiment
    Quy, Mai D.
    Ha, Dang T.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [36] Elicitation of preferences in the second half of the shared decision making process needs attention; a qualitative study
    W. Savelberg
    M. Smidt
    L. J. Boersma
    T. van der Weijden
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [37] Elicitation of preferences in the second half of the shared decision making process needs attention; a qualitative study
    Savelberg, W.
    Smidt, M.
    Boersma, L. J.
    van der Weijden, T.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [38] Farmers' Willingness to Accept Animal Welfare Practices: A Discrete Choice Experiment with German Pig Producers
    Danne, Michael
    Musshoff, Oliver
    [J]. GERMAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 71 (01): : 1 - 15
  • [39] Awareness concerning optimal pig production management and animal welfare among smallholder farmers in Tanzania
    Braae, U. C.
    Penrith, M-L
    Ngowi, H. A.
    Lekule, F.
    Johansen, M. V.
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2016, 25 (04) : 439 - 446
  • [40] A decision support model for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic preferences relations
    Jin, Feifei
    Ni, Zhiwei
    Pei, Lidan
    Chen, Huayou
    Li, Yaping
    Zhu, Xuhui
    Ni, Liping
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2019, 31 (Suppl 2): : 1103 - 1124