PI-RADS version 2.1: one small step for prostate MRI

被引:105
|
作者
Barrett, T. [1 ,2 ]
Rajesh, A. [3 ]
Rosenkrantz, A. B. [4 ]
Choyke, P. L. [5 ]
Turkbey, B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[3] Leicester Gen Hosp, Radiol Dept, Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE5 4PW, Leics, England
[4] NYU, Sch Med, NYU Langone Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 660 1st Ave,Third Floor, New York, NY 10016 USA
[5] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, Ctr Canc Res, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; NORMAL CENTRAL ZONE; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; BIPARAMETRIC MRI; SEMINAL-VESICLE; CANCER; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2019.05.019
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Multiparametric (mp) prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is playing an increasingly prominent role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected prostate cancer. Performing mpMRI before biopsy offers several advantages including biopsy avoidance under certain clinical circumstances and targeting biopsy of suspicious lesions to enable the correct diagnosis. The success of the technique is heavily dependent on high-quality image acquisition, interpretation, and report communication, all areas addressed by previous versions of the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) recommendations. Numerous studies have validated the approach, but the widespread adoption of PI-RADS version 2 has also highlighted inconsistencies and limitations, particularly relating to interobserver variability for evaluation of the transition zone. These limitations are addressed in the recently released version 2.1. In this article, we highlight the key changes proposed in PI-RADS v2.1 and explore the background reasoning and evidence for the recommendations. (C) 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 852
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PI-RADS Classification: Structured Reporting for MRI of the Prostate
    Roethke, M.
    Blondin, D.
    Schlemmer, H. -P.
    Franiel, T.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2013, 185 (03): : 253 - 261
  • [32] Quality of Prostate MRI: Is the PI-RADS Standard Sufficient?
    Sackett, Jonathan
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Reese, Sarah E.
    Brender, Jeffrey R.
    Harmon, Stephanie A.
    Barrett, Tristan
    Coskun, Mehmet
    Madariaga, Manuel
    Marko, Jamie
    Law, Yan Mee
    Turkbey, Evrim B.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Sanford, Thomas
    Lay, Nathan
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 199 - 207
  • [33] PI-RADS 2.1 and structured reporting of magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate
    Hoetker, Andreas
    Donati, Olivio F.
    RADIOLOGE, 2021, 61 (09): : 802 - 809
  • [34] Evaluation of prostate volume in mpMRI: comparison of the recommendations of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v2.1
    Gundogdu, Elif
    Emekli, Emre
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [35] PI-RADS version 2.1 scoring system is superior in detecting transition zone prostate cancer: a diagnostic study
    Wang, Zhibing
    Zhao, Wenlu
    Shen, Junkang
    Jiang, Zhen
    Yang, Shuo
    Tan, Shuangxiu
    Zhang, Yueyue
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (12) : 4142 - 4149
  • [36] PI-RADS version 2.1 scoring system is superior in detecting transition zone prostate cancer: a diagnostic study
    Zhibing Wang
    Wenlu Zhao
    Junkang Shen
    Zhen Jiang
    Shuo Yang
    Shuangxiu Tan
    Yueyue Zhang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 4142 - 4149
  • [37] Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2
    Tewes, Susanne
    Mokov, Nikolaj
    Hartung, Dagmar
    Schick, Volker
    Peters, Inga
    Schedl, Peter
    Pertschy, Stefanie
    Wacker, Frank
    Voshage, Goetz
    Hueper, Katja
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [38] Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1
    T. Ullrich
    L. Schimmöller
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 3961 - 3968
  • [39] Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1
    Ullrich, T.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (12) : 3961 - 3968
  • [40] Interreader agreement with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 2.1 to improve the detection rate of prostate cancer in MRI/TRUS software fusion prostate biopsy
    Kim, J.
    Song, W. H.
    Lee, D. D.
    Lee, S. S.
    Nam, J. K.
    Ryu, H. S.
    Kim, T. U.
    Park, S. W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S722 - S723