PI-RADS version 2.1: one small step for prostate MRI

被引:105
|
作者
Barrett, T. [1 ,2 ]
Rajesh, A. [3 ]
Rosenkrantz, A. B. [4 ]
Choyke, P. L. [5 ]
Turkbey, B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Radiol, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[3] Leicester Gen Hosp, Radiol Dept, Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE5 4PW, Leics, England
[4] NYU, Sch Med, NYU Langone Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 660 1st Ave,Third Floor, New York, NY 10016 USA
[5] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, Ctr Canc Res, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; NORMAL CENTRAL ZONE; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; BIPARAMETRIC MRI; SEMINAL-VESICLE; CANCER; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2019.05.019
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Multiparametric (mp) prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is playing an increasingly prominent role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected prostate cancer. Performing mpMRI before biopsy offers several advantages including biopsy avoidance under certain clinical circumstances and targeting biopsy of suspicious lesions to enable the correct diagnosis. The success of the technique is heavily dependent on high-quality image acquisition, interpretation, and report communication, all areas addressed by previous versions of the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) recommendations. Numerous studies have validated the approach, but the widespread adoption of PI-RADS version 2 has also highlighted inconsistencies and limitations, particularly relating to interobserver variability for evaluation of the transition zone. These limitations are addressed in the recently released version 2.1. In this article, we highlight the key changes proposed in PI-RADS v2.1 and explore the background reasoning and evidence for the recommendations. (C) 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 852
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association of prostate zonal volume with location and aggressiveness of clinically significant prostate cancer: A multiparametric MRI study according to PI-RADS version 2.1
    Yang, Ling
    Li, Mou
    Zhang, Meng-Ni
    Yao, Jin
    Song, Bin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 150
  • [22] Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: how we review and report
    Steiger, Philipp
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    CANCER IMAGING, 2016, 16
  • [23] Comparison of PI-RADS Versions 2.0 and 2.1 for MRI-based Calculation of the Prostate Volume
    Ghafoor, Soleen
    Becker, Anton S.
    Woo, Sungmin
    Andrieu, Pamela I. Causa
    Stocker, Daniel
    Gangai, Natalie
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (11) : 1548 - 1556
  • [24] Value of an online PI-RADS v2.1 score calculator for assessment of prostate MRI
    Barth, Borna K.
    Martini, Katharina
    Skawran, Stephan M.
    Schmid, Florian A.
    Rupp, Niels J.
    Zuber, Laura
    Donati, Olivio F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY OPEN, 2021, 8
  • [25] Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: how we review and report
    Philipp Steiger
    Harriet C. Thoeny
    Cancer Imaging, 16
  • [26] Significance of atypical nodules upgraded to category 3 in PI-RADS version 2.1 for the prostate cancer diagnosis
    Asai, S.
    Kobayashi, M.
    Fukuda, S.
    Kimura, K.
    Fujiwara, M.
    Nakamura, Y.
    Ishikawa, Y.
    Waseda, Y.
    Tanaka, H.
    Yoshida, S.
    Yokoyama, M.
    Fujii, Y.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83
  • [27] Reply to "Is PI-RADS Ready for Biparametric Prostate MRI?"
    Correia, Eduardo T. de Oliveira
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    Paranhos, Bruno Merz
    Shoag, Jonathan E.
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Bittencourt, Leonardo K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2024, 222 (05)
  • [28] Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer
    Madhuri Monique Rudolph
    Alexander Daniel Jacques Baur
    Hannes Cash
    Matthias Haas
    Samy Mahjoub
    Alexander Hartenstein
    Charlie Alexander Hamm
    Nick Lasse Beetz
    Frank Konietschke
    Bernd Hamm
    Patrick Asbach
    Tobias Penzkofer
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [29] Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers
    Wei, Chao-gang
    Zhang, Yue-yue
    Pan, Peng
    Chen, Tong
    Yu, Hong-chang
    Dai, Guang-cheng
    Tu, Jian
    Yang, Shuo
    Zhao, Wen-lu
    Shen, Jun-kang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (05) : 1247 - 1256
  • [30] Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS version 2.1 compared to version 2.0 for detection of peripheral and transition zone prostate cancer
    Rudolph, Madhuri Monique
    Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques
    Cash, Hannes
    Haas, Matthias
    Mahjoub, Samy
    Hartenstein, Alexander
    Hamm, Charlie Alexander
    Beetz, Nick Lasse
    Konietschke, Frank
    Hamm, Bernd
    Asbach, Patrick
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)