Discovering local patterns of co-evolution: computational aspects and biological examples

被引:6
|
作者
Tuller, Tamir [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Felder, Yifat [1 ]
Kupiec, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Comp Sci, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Mol Microbiol & Biotechnol, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[4] Weizmann Inst Sci, Fac Math & Comp Sci, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
来源
BMC BIOINFORMATICS | 2010年 / 11卷
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
GENOME EVOLUTION; GENES; DUPLICATION; DIVERGENCE; PREDICTION; ALIGNMENT; NETWORKS; PROTEINS; DATABASE; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2105-11-43
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Co-evolution is the process in which two (or more) sets of orthologs exhibit a similar or correlative pattern of evolution. Co-evolution is a powerful way to learn about the functional interdependencies between sets of genes and cellular functions and to predict physical interactions. More generally, it can be used for answering fundamental questions about the evolution of biological systems. Orthologs that exhibit a strong signal of co-evolution in a certain part of the evolutionary tree may show a mild signal of co-evolution in other branches of the tree. The major reasons for this phenomenon are noise in the biological input, genes that gain or lose functions, and the fact that some measures of co-evolution relate to rare events such as positive selection. Previous publications in the field dealt with the problem of finding sets of genes that co-evolved along an entire underlying phylogenetic tree, without considering the fact that often co-evolution is local. Results: In this work, we describe a new set of biological problems that are related to finding patterns of local co-evolution. We discuss their computational complexity and design algorithms for solving them. These algorithms outperform other bi-clustering methods as they are designed specifically for solving the set of problems mentioned above. We use our approach to trace the co-evolution of fungal, eukaryotic, and mammalian genes at high resolution across the different parts of the corresponding phylogenetic trees. Specifically, we discover regions in the fungi tree that are enriched with positive evolution. We show that metabolic genes exhibit a remarkable level of co-evolution and different patterns of co-evolution in various biological datasets. In addition, we find that protein complexes that are related to gene expression exhibit non-homogenous levels of co-evolution across different parts of the fungi evolutionary line. In the case of mammalian evolution, signaling pathways that are related to neurotransmission exhibit a relatively higher level of co-evolution along the primate subtree. Conclusions: We show that finding local patterns of co-evolution is a computationally challenging task and we offer novel algorithms that allow us to solve this problem, thus opening a new approach for analyzing the evolution of biological systems.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The co-evolution of cooperation and defection under local interaction and endogenous network formation
    Bilancini, Ennio
    Boncinelli, Leonardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2009, 70 (1-2) : 186 - 195
  • [42] Patterns of co-evolution: analyzing fashion brand and sewing contractor company dynamics
    Kwon, Ki Yong
    [J]. FASHION AND TEXTILES, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [43] Patterns of co-evolution: analyzing fashion brand and sewing contractor company dynamics
    Ki Yong Kwon
    [J]. Fashion and Textiles, 11
  • [45] Problem-driven innovations in drug discovery: Co-evolution of the patterns of radical innovation with the evolution of problems
    Coccia, Mario
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 5 (02) : 143 - 155
  • [46] Distinct co-evolution patterns of genes associated to DNA polymerase III DnaE and PolC
    Stefan Engelen
    David Vallenet
    Claudine Médigue
    Antoine Danchin
    [J]. BMC Genomics, 13
  • [47] Quantitative evolutionary patterns in bipartite networks: Vicariance, phylogenetic tracking or diffuse co-evolution?
    Russo, Laura
    Miller, Adam D.
    Tooker, John
    Bjornstad, Ottar N.
    Shea, Katriona
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 9 (03): : 761 - 772
  • [48] Leveraging Code-Test Co-evolution Patterns for Automated Test Case Recommendation
    Shimmi, Samiha
    Rahimi, Mona
    [J]. 3RD ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION OF SOFTWARE TEST (AST 2022), 2022, : 65 - 76
  • [49] Distinct co-evolution patterns of genes associated to DNA polymerase III DnaE and PolC
    Engelen, Stefan
    Vallenet, David
    Medigue, Claudine
    Danchin, Antoine
    [J]. BMC GENOMICS, 2012, 13
  • [50] Integrating the Designer in-the-loop for Metamodel/Model Co-Evolution via Interactive Computational Search
    Kessentini, Wael
    Wimmer, Manuel
    Sahraoui, Houari
    [J]. 21ST ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODEL DRIVEN ENGINEERING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS (MODELS 2018), 2018, : 101 - 111