Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study

被引:200
|
作者
Siche, Raul [1 ]
Pereira, Lucas [2 ]
Agostinho, Feni [2 ]
Ortega, Enrique [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Trujillo, Fac Ciencias Agropecuarias, Escuela Ingn Agroind, Trujillo, Peru
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, UNICAMP, Food Eng Sch, Ecol Engn Lab, BR-13083862 Campinas, SP, Brazil
关键词
Emergy analysis; Ecological footprint; Sustainability indicators; Peru; NATIONS; EXERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.027
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In the last decade, two scientific tools have been extensively used worldwide to measure the human impact on nature: ecological footprint (EF) and emergy analysis (EA). Papers trying to combine the strong points of EF and EA, and obtain more accurate results have appeared in scientific literature, in which Zhao's et al. (2005) [61] approach is an important one. Unfortunately, some weak points of the original methods still remain on the new approaches proposed. The aim of this present work is to discuss some weak points found in Zhao's approach, trying to overcome them through a new approach called emergetic ecological footprint (EEF). The main difference between Zhao's approach and EEF is that the last one accounted for the internal storage of capital natural in the biocapacity calculation. Besides that, soil loss and water for human consume were considered as additional categories in the footprint calculation. After discussing it through comparisons with other approaches, EEF was used to assess Peru as a case study, resulting in a biocapacity of 51.76 gha capita(-1) and a footprint of 12.23 gha capita(-1), with 2004 data; that resulted in an ecological surplus of 39.53 gha capita(-1). The load capacity factor obtained was 4.23, meaning that Peru can support a population 4.23 times bigger considering the life style of 2004. The main limitations of the EEF are: (i) it is impossible to make comparisons between the biocapacity and footprint for each category; (ii) a need for a handbook with emergy intensity factors with good quality. On the other hand, the main positive points are: (i) its easiness of application in global and national scales; (ii) its final indicators account for all the previous energy (or emergy) used to make something; (iii) internal natural capital storage was accounted for in the biocapacity calculation, which can be a valid step towards the evaluation and assess of services provided by nature. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3182 / 3192
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sustainability of a typical biogas system in China: Emergy-based ecological footprint assessment
    Wu, X. F.
    Yang, Q.
    Xia, X. H.
    Wu, T. H.
    Wu, X. D.
    Shao, L.
    Hayat, T.
    Alsaedi, A.
    Chen, G. Q.
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 26 : 78 - 84
  • [22] Emergy network analysis of Chinese sectoral ecological sustainability
    Sun, Xiaoqi
    An, Haizhong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 174 : 548 - 559
  • [23] The ecological footprint as indicator for sustainable development - Results of an international case study
    van Vuuren, DP
    Smeets, EMW
    de Kruijf, HAM
    MANAGING FOR HEALTHY ECOSYSTEMS, 2003, : 343 - 352
  • [24] The Dynamic Analysis and Comparison of Emergy Ecological Footprint for the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: A Case Study of Qinghai Province and Tibet
    Wei, Wei
    Li, Wenlong
    Song, Yu
    Xu, Jing
    Wang, Wenying
    Liu, Chenli
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (20)
  • [25] Stochastic and club convergence of ecological footprint: An empirical analysis for different income group of countries
    Erdogan, Sinan
    Okumus, Ilyas
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 121
  • [26] The ecological footprint as an educational tool for sustainability: A case study analysis in an Israeli public high school
    Gottlieb, Dan
    Vigoda-Gadot, Eran
    Haim, Abraham
    Kissinger, Meidad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 32 (01) : 193 - 200
  • [27] Urban ecological security dynamic analysis based on an innovative emergy ecological footprint method
    Zhang, Junxue
    Ma, Lin
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (11) : 16163 - 16191
  • [28] Urban ecological security dynamic analysis based on an innovative emergy ecological footprint method
    Junxue Zhang
    Lin Ma
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23 : 16163 - 16191
  • [29] Sustainability assessment of urban ecological-economic systems based on emergy analysis: A case study in Simao, China
    Pan, Yuxue
    Zhang, Boya
    Wu, Yang
    Tian, Yu
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 121
  • [30] Research on Regional Ecological-Economic Sustainability Evaluation Based on Emergy Analysis - Case Study of Shandong Province
    Zhong Pei
    Xia Weili
    DYNAMICS OF URBAN AGGLOMERATION IN CHINA: PREFERENCES OF ENERGY-SAVING AND ENVIRONMENT-FRIENDLY SOCIETY, 2009, : 43 - 48