Urban ecological security dynamic analysis based on an innovative emergy ecological footprint method

被引:25
|
作者
Zhang, Junxue [1 ]
Ma, Lin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Architecture, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Environm Sch, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[3] State Key Lab Biogeol & Environm Geol, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecological security; Emergy analysis; Ecological footprint approach; Emergy carrying capacity; Ecological and economic coordination; Sustainability in Beijing; ECOSYSTEM HEALTH-ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; INPUT-OUTPUT; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; CARRYING-CAPACITY; PRODUCTION SYSTEM; FLOW-ANALYSIS; CHINA; METABOLISM;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-021-01341-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In China, with the rapid development of economy and the advancement of urbanization, the deterioration of urban ecological environment is obvious. In order to obtain the quantitative state of urban ecological security, this paper contributes an integrated and coupled emergy ecological footprint framework and Beijing city was selected to verify methodology effect in this paper. The results demonstrate that: (1) from 2010 to 2019, the change range of EEFB is from 6.37 to 9.29%; meanwhile, EEFI is from 7.95 to 17.72%; EEFE is from 36.36 to 63.71%; EEFP is from 18.45% to 41.65%. Comparing the proportions of four subparts, the energy resource products (EEFE) and emissions (EEFP) are the main factors, far more significant than biological resources (EEFB) and industrial products (EEFI). (2) Compared to all ECCS data, there is a definite growing trend in Beijing city, from 2.68E + 4 hm2/cap in 2010 to 4.72E+4 hm2/cap in 2019, approximately 42.22% growth range. (3) Four sustainable indicators analysis: The changes of EEFT, EBI, and EEF are from 3.1, 2.46, and 1.02 in 2010 to 0.688, 9.29 and 1.14 in 2019, respectively. For EDI, total proportions of fossil land and built-up land are 85.25% to 90.43% of the entire EEF in Beijing city. These results reflect that Beijing city is suffering from a substantial ecological challenge due to remarkable ecological deficit, awfully high emergy ecological footprint intensity, and low cooperation level between ecological system and economic system. To identify key improvement factors, Pearson correlation analysis was conducted in this paper and revealed the most positive and negative elements, which are the unbalanced industrial structure and a large proportion heavy and polluting industries in Beijing city. Finally, based on the pivotal influencing factors, corresponding strategies and measures are proposed to improve and optimize the ecological security in Beijing city.
引用
收藏
页码:16163 / 16191
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Urban ecological security dynamic analysis based on an innovative emergy ecological footprint method
    Junxue Zhang
    Lin Ma
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23 : 16163 - 16191
  • [2] Marine ecological security assessment from the perspective of emergy ecological footprint
    Wang, Cui
    Lin, Aiyong
    Liu, Conghu
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 9
  • [3] Quantitative analysis of the dynamic changes of ecological security in the provinces of China through emergy-ecological footprint hybrid indicators
    Yang, Qing
    Liu, Gengyuan
    Hao, Yan
    Coscieme, Luca
    Zhang, Jiaqi
    Jiang, Nannan
    Casazza, Marco
    Giannetti, Biagio F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 184 : 678 - 695
  • [4] Evaluation and analysis of ecological security in arid areas of Central Asia based on the emergy ecological footprint (EEF) model
    Li, Jia-Xiu
    Chen, Ya-Ning
    Xu, Chang-Chun
    Li, Zhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 235 : 664 - 677
  • [5] An improved emergy ecological footprint method for ecological security assessment and quantitative analysis of influencing factors: a case study of Zhejiang Province
    Ma, Shuhua
    Xue, Minggao
    Ji, Siwen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 66 (14) : 2878 - 2902
  • [6] Dynamic decomposition and regional differences of urban emergy ecological footprint in the Yangtze River Delta
    Pan, Xiongfeng
    Guo, Shucen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 326
  • [7] Spatiotemporal evolution of county level ecological security based on an emergy ecological footprint model: The case of Dingxi, China
    Lu, Yanhua
    Yan, Lijuan
    Li, Jie
    Liang, Yunliang
    Yang, Chuanjie
    Li, Guang
    Wu, Jiangqi
    Xu, Hua
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2024, 490
  • [8] Emergy-based ecological footprint analysis for a mega-city: The dynamic changes of Shanghai
    Pan, Hengyu
    Zhuang, Mufan
    Geng, Yong
    Wu, Fei
    Dong, Huijuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 210 : 552 - 562
  • [9] Emergy-based ecological footprint analysis of a wind farm in China
    Zhang, Xiaoqin
    Xu, Ling
    Chen, Yu
    Liu, Tingting
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 111
  • [10] Regional ecological security assessment based on long periods of ecological footprint analysis
    Huang, Qing
    Wang, Ranghui
    Ren, Zhiyuan
    Li, Jing
    Zhang, Huizhi
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2007, 51 (01) : 24 - 41