Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol

被引:3
|
作者
Hoffmann, Christin [1 ]
Hossaini, Sina [1 ]
Cousins, Sian [1 ]
Blencowe, Natalie [1 ,2 ]
Mcnair, Angus G. K. [1 ,3 ]
Blazeby, Jane M. [1 ,2 ]
Avery, Kerry N. L. [1 ]
Potter, Shelley [1 ,3 ]
Macefield, Rhiannon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol Biomed Res Ctr Surg Innovat Theme, Natl Inst Hlth Res,Ctr Surg Res, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Univ Hosp Bristol & Weston NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, Avon, England
来源
关键词
Innovation; Surgery; Modifications; Review; Operative; Procedures;
D O I
10.29337/ijsp.167
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Innovation in surgery drives improvements to patient care. New surgical procedures and devices typically undergo a series of modifications as they a re developed and refined during their introduction into clinical practice. These changes should ideally be reported and shared between surgeon-innovators to promote efficient, safe and transparent innovation. Currently, agreement on how modifications should be defined, conceptualised and classified, so they can be reported and shared efficiently and transparently, is lacking. The aim of this review is to examine and summarise existing literature on definitions, perceptions and classifications of modifications to surgical procedures/devices, including views on how to measure and report them. The findings will inform future work to standardise reporting and sharing of modifications in surgical innovation. Materials and Methods: A systematic scoping review will be conducted adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Included articles will focus on review articles and opinion pieces relevant to modifications to new surgical procedures or devices introduced to clinical practice. Methods to identify relevant literature will include systematic searches in MEDLINE (Ovid version), targeted internet searches (Google Scholar) and snowball searches. A two-stage screening process (titles/abstracts/keywords and fulltexts) will use specified exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify eligible articles. Data on how modifications are i) defined, ii) perceived, and iii) classified, and iv) views on how modifications should be measured and reported, will be extracted verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis will be applied to extracted data where appropriate. Results will be presented as a narrative summary including descriptive characteristics of included articles. Findings will inform a preliminary conceptual framework to facilitate the systematic reporting and sharing of modifications to novel procedures and devices.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 256
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature
    Samaan, Zainab
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Kosa, Daisy
    Debono, Victoria Borg
    Dillenburg, Rejane
    Zhang, Shiyuan
    Fruci, Vincent
    Dennis, Brittany
    Bawor, Monica
    Thabane, Lehana
    JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2013, 6 : 169 - 188
  • [32] Biology of selective caries removal: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Widbiller, Matthias
    Weiler, Rita
    Knuettel, Helge
    Galler, Kerstin M.
    Buchalla, Wolfgang
    Scholz, Konstantin J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [33] Palliative care delivery models: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Dashti, Seemin
    Shaghaghi, Abdolreza
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2023, 29 (06) : 292 - 297
  • [34] The Digital Engagement of Older People: Systematic Scoping Review Protocol
    Kebede, Abraham Sahilemichael
    Ozolins, Lise -Lotte
    Holst, Hanna
    Galvin, Kathleen
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (07):
  • [35] Consequences of health condition labelling: protocol for a systematic scoping review
    Sims, Rebecca
    Kazda, Luise
    Michaleff, Zoe A.
    Glasziou, Paul
    Thomas, Rae
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [36] Neuroimaging through Sonolucent Cranioplasty: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol
    Rossitto, Christina P.
    Devarajan, Alex
    Price, Gabrielle
    Ali, Muhammad
    Kellner, Christopher P.
    METHODS AND PROTOCOLS, 2022, 5 (05)
  • [37] Interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research: a scoping review protocol
    Blanco, David
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Moher, David
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Cobo, Erik
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (11):
  • [38] Dietary assessment methodology and reporting in Pacific Island research: a scoping review protocol
    Craven, Dana Louise
    Vogliano, Chris
    Horsey, Bridget
    Underhill, Steven
    Burkhart, Sarah
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (05) : 1157 - 1163
  • [39] Guidance relevant to the reporting of health equity in observational research: a scoping review protocol
    Rizvi, Anita
    Lawson, Daeria O.
    Young, Taryn
    Dewidar, Omar
    Nicholls, Stuart
    Akl, Elie A.
    Little, Julian
    Magwood, Olivia
    Shamseer, Larissa
    Ghogomu, Elizabeth
    Jull, Janet Elizabeth
    Rader, Tamara
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar
    Chamberlain, Catherine
    Ellingwood, Holly
    Greer-Smith, Regina
    Hardy, Billie-Jo
    Harwood, Matire
    Kennedy, Michelle
    Kredo, Tamara
    Loder, Elizabeth
    Mahande, Michael Johnson J.
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Nkangu, Miriam
    Okwen, Patrick M.
    Ramke, Jacqueline
    Tufte, Janice
    Tugwell, Peter
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Wiysonge, Charles Shey
    Welch, Vivian A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [40] A systematic review and in-depth analysis of outcome reporting in early phase studies of colorectal cancer surgical innovation
    Hoffmann, C.
    Macefield, R. C.
    Wilson, N.
    Blazeby, J. M.
    Avery, K. N. L.
    Potter, S.
    McNair, A. G. K.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 22 (12) : 1862 - 1873