Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol

被引:3
|
作者
Hoffmann, Christin [1 ]
Hossaini, Sina [1 ]
Cousins, Sian [1 ]
Blencowe, Natalie [1 ,2 ]
Mcnair, Angus G. K. [1 ,3 ]
Blazeby, Jane M. [1 ,2 ]
Avery, Kerry N. L. [1 ]
Potter, Shelley [1 ,3 ]
Macefield, Rhiannon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol Biomed Res Ctr Surg Innovat Theme, Natl Inst Hlth Res,Ctr Surg Res, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Univ Hosp Bristol & Weston NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, Avon, England
来源
关键词
Innovation; Surgery; Modifications; Review; Operative; Procedures;
D O I
10.29337/ijsp.167
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Innovation in surgery drives improvements to patient care. New surgical procedures and devices typically undergo a series of modifications as they a re developed and refined during their introduction into clinical practice. These changes should ideally be reported and shared between surgeon-innovators to promote efficient, safe and transparent innovation. Currently, agreement on how modifications should be defined, conceptualised and classified, so they can be reported and shared efficiently and transparently, is lacking. The aim of this review is to examine and summarise existing literature on definitions, perceptions and classifications of modifications to surgical procedures/devices, including views on how to measure and report them. The findings will inform future work to standardise reporting and sharing of modifications in surgical innovation. Materials and Methods: A systematic scoping review will be conducted adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Included articles will focus on review articles and opinion pieces relevant to modifications to new surgical procedures or devices introduced to clinical practice. Methods to identify relevant literature will include systematic searches in MEDLINE (Ovid version), targeted internet searches (Google Scholar) and snowball searches. A two-stage screening process (titles/abstracts/keywords and fulltexts) will use specified exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify eligible articles. Data on how modifications are i) defined, ii) perceived, and iii) classified, and iv) views on how modifications should be measured and reported, will be extracted verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis will be applied to extracted data where appropriate. Results will be presented as a narrative summary including descriptive characteristics of included articles. Findings will inform a preliminary conceptual framework to facilitate the systematic reporting and sharing of modifications to novel procedures and devices.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 256
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic Review of Innovation Reporting in Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty
    Currie, Andrew C.
    Glaysher, Michael A.
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    Kelly, Jamie
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (07) : 2962 - 2978
  • [22] Investigating asthma comorbidities: a systematic scoping review protocol
    El Ferkh, Karim
    Nwaru, Bright
    Griffiths, Chris
    Sheikh, Aziz
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (08):
  • [23] Reporting of patient journey mapping in current literature: a scoping review protocol
    Davies, Ellen L.
    Pollock, Danielle
    Graham, Amy
    Laing, Robert E.
    Langton, Vikki
    Bulto, Lemma
    Kelly, Janet
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (05) : 1361 - 1368
  • [24] Protocol for the systematic review of the reporting of transoral robotic surgery
    Main, Barry G.
    Blencowe, Natalie S.
    Howes, Noah
    Cousins, Sian
    Avery, Kerry N. L.
    Gormley, Alexander
    Radford, Phil
    Elliott, Daisy
    Byrne, Benjamin
    Wilson, Nicholas
    Hinchliffe, Robert
    Blazebyl, Jane M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (01):
  • [25] Surgical innovation: the ethical agenda: A systematic review
    Broekman, Marike L.
    Carriere, Michelle E.
    Bredenoord, Annelien L.
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (25)
  • [26] Surgical Residents'Perception of Feedback on Their Education:Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Costa, Carlos Dario da Silva
    Silva, Gabriela Gouvea
    dos Santos, Emerson Roberto
    Engel, Ana Maria RitaPedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho
    Costa, Ana Caroline dos Santos
    da Silva, Taisa Morete
    da Conceicao, Washington Henrique
    Cristovao, Helena
    Lima, Alba Regina de Abreu
    Brienze, Vania M. S.
    Bizotto, Thais Santana Gastardelo
    Oliani, Antonio Helio
    Cesarandre, Julio
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [27] Reporting of planned statistical methods in published surgical randomised trial protocols: a protocol for a methodological systematic review
    Madden, Kim
    Arseneau, Erika
    Evaniew, Nathan
    Smith, Christopher S.
    Thabane, Lehana
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (06):
  • [28] Characterization of Innovation to Fight Child Mortality: A Systematic Scoping Review
    Da Costa, Bruno Filipe Coelho
    Carneiro, Bruno Daniel
    Ramalho, Andre
    Freitas, Alberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 67
  • [29] Surveys in Surgical Education: A Systematic Review and Reporting Guideline
    Banning, Louise B. D.
    Meyer, Vincent M.
    Keupers, Joost
    Lange, Johan F. M.
    Pol, Robert A.
    Benjamens, Stan
    EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 62 (02) : 61 - 67
  • [30] Barriers to and facilitators of paediatric medical device innovation: a scoping review protocol
    Kysh, Lynn
    Zapotoczny, Grzegorz
    Manzanete, Lisa
    Carey, Megan
    Shah, Payal
    Joseph, Francesca
    Kempf, Haley
    Sikder, Abu Taher
    Finkel, Julia
    Thekkedath, Usha
    Toman, Kara
    Koh, Chester J.
    Eskandanian, Kolaleh
    Espinoza, Juan
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (06):