Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol

被引:3
|
作者
Hoffmann, Christin [1 ]
Hossaini, Sina [1 ]
Cousins, Sian [1 ]
Blencowe, Natalie [1 ,2 ]
Mcnair, Angus G. K. [1 ,3 ]
Blazeby, Jane M. [1 ,2 ]
Avery, Kerry N. L. [1 ]
Potter, Shelley [1 ,3 ]
Macefield, Rhiannon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol Biomed Res Ctr Surg Innovat Theme, Natl Inst Hlth Res,Ctr Surg Res, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Univ Hosp Bristol & Weston NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, Avon, England
来源
关键词
Innovation; Surgery; Modifications; Review; Operative; Procedures;
D O I
10.29337/ijsp.167
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Innovation in surgery drives improvements to patient care. New surgical procedures and devices typically undergo a series of modifications as they a re developed and refined during their introduction into clinical practice. These changes should ideally be reported and shared between surgeon-innovators to promote efficient, safe and transparent innovation. Currently, agreement on how modifications should be defined, conceptualised and classified, so they can be reported and shared efficiently and transparently, is lacking. The aim of this review is to examine and summarise existing literature on definitions, perceptions and classifications of modifications to surgical procedures/devices, including views on how to measure and report them. The findings will inform future work to standardise reporting and sharing of modifications in surgical innovation. Materials and Methods: A systematic scoping review will be conducted adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Included articles will focus on review articles and opinion pieces relevant to modifications to new surgical procedures or devices introduced to clinical practice. Methods to identify relevant literature will include systematic searches in MEDLINE (Ovid version), targeted internet searches (Google Scholar) and snowball searches. A two-stage screening process (titles/abstracts/keywords and fulltexts) will use specified exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify eligible articles. Data on how modifications are i) defined, ii) perceived, and iii) classified, and iv) views on how modifications should be measured and reported, will be extracted verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis will be applied to extracted data where appropriate. Results will be presented as a narrative summary including descriptive characteristics of included articles. Findings will inform a preliminary conceptual framework to facilitate the systematic reporting and sharing of modifications to novel procedures and devices.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 256
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a conceptual framework for reporting modifications in surgical innovation: scoping review
    Hossaini, Sina
    Hoffmann, Christin
    Cousins, Sian
    Blencowe, Natalie
    McNair, Angus G. K.
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Avery, Kerry N. L.
    Potter, Shelley
    Macefield, Rhiannon
    BJS OPEN, 2023, 7 (02):
  • [2] Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines: a scoping review protocol
    Zhang, Kaiping
    Ma, Yanfang
    Shi, Qianling
    Shen, Jianfei
    Wu, Jinlin
    Zhang, Xianzhuo
    Jiao, Panpan
    Li, Grace S.
    Tang, Xueqin
    Petersen, Rene Horsleben
    Ng, Calvin S. H.
    Fiorelli, Alfonso
    Novoa, Nuria M.
    Bedetti, Benedetta
    Sandri, Giovanni Battista Levi
    Hochwald, Steven
    Lerut, Toni
    Sihoe, Alan D. L.
    Barchi, Leandro Cardoso
    Gilbert, Sebastien
    Waseda, Ryuichi
    Toker, Alper
    Gonzalez-Rivas, Diego
    Fruscio, Robert
    Scarci, Marco
    Davoli, Fabio
    Piessen, Guillaume
    Qiu, Bin
    Wang, Stephen
    Chen, Yaolong
    Gao, Shugeng
    GLAND SURGERY, 2021, 10 (07) : 2325 - 2333
  • [3] Reporting of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy As A Surgical Innovation: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis
    Scroggie, D.
    Lee, K. S.
    Purves, R.
    Sewart, E.
    Van Laarhoven, S.
    Robinson, T.
    Rees, J.
    Pathak, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [4] Systematic review of surgical innovation reporting in laparoendoscopic colonic polyp resection
    Currie, A.
    Brigic, A.
    Blencowe, N. S.
    Potter, S.
    Faiz, O. D.
    Kennedy, R. H.
    Blazeby, J. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (02) : E108 - E116
  • [5] A systematic review protocol for reporting deficiencies within surgical case series
    Agha, Riaz
    Fowler, Alexander J.
    Lee, Seon-Young
    Gundogan, Buket
    Whitehurst, Katharine
    Sagoo, Hakiran
    Jeong, Kyung Jin Lee
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Orgill, Dennis P.
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (10):
  • [6] A Systematic Review Measuring and Reporting the Surgical Learning Curve in Early Phase Studies of Surgical Innovation
    Alford, N.
    Shah, M.
    Hudson, E.
    Mutanga, I.
    Macefield, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [7] Reporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: Protocol for systematic review
    Wu R.
    Glen P.
    Ramsay T.
    Martel G.
    Systematic Reviews, 3 (1)
  • [8] Surgical portfolios: A systematic scoping review
    Chong, Eleanor Jia Xin
    Wang, Ming Jia
    Lim, Jia Yin
    Shen, Grace Shen
    Chow, Misha Jing Yi
    Koh, Kai Kee
    Lim, Annabelle Jia Sing
    Hong, Daniel Zhihao
    Ting, Jacquelin Jia Qi
    Pisupati, Anushka
    Lam, Betrand Kai Yang
    Ong, Yun Ting
    Chiam, Min
    Mason, Stephen
    Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha
    Tan, Si Ying
    SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [9] 794 A Systematic Review Measuring and Reporting the Surgical Learning Curve in Early Phase Studies of Surgical Innovation
    Alford, N.
    Shah, M.
    Hudson, E.
    Mutanga, I
    Macefield, R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (SUPPL 2)
  • [10] Outcomes reporting in systematic reviews on surgical endodontics: A scoping review for the development of a core outcome set
    Shah, Pratik Kamalkant
    El Karim, Ikhlas
    Duncan, Henry F.
    Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu
    Chong, Bun San
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2022, 55 (08) : 811 - 832