RT-qPCR and ATOPlex sequencing for the sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA for wastewater surveillance

被引:15
|
作者
Ahmed, Warish [1 ]
Bivins, Aaron [2 ]
Metcalfe, Suzanne [1 ]
Smith, Wendy J. M. [1 ]
Ziels, Ryan [3 ]
Korajkic, Asja [4 ]
McMinn, Brian [4 ]
Graber, Tyson E. [5 ]
Simpson, Stuart L. [6 ]
机构
[1] Ecosci Precinct, CSIRO Land & Water, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Pk, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Civil Engn, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] united States Environm Protect Agcy, 26 W Martin Luther King Jr Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Eastern Ontario Res Inst, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada
[6] CSIRO Land & Water, Lucas Heights, NSW 2234, Australia
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Detection limit; Recovery; Concentration method; Enveloped virus; Wastewater; QUANTIFY;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2022.118621
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, wastewater surveillance has become an important tool for monitoring the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) within communities. In particular, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) has been used to detect and quantify SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater, while monitoring viral genome mutations requires separate approaches such as deep sequencing. A high throughput sequencing platform (ATOPlex) that uses a multiplex tiled PCR-based enrichment technique has shown promise in detecting variants of concern (VOC) while also providing virus quantitation data. However, detection sensitivities of both RT-qPCR and sequencing can be impacted through losses occurring during sample handling, virus concentration, nucleic acid extraction, and RT-qPCR. Therefore, process limit of detection (PLOD) assessments are required to estimate the gene copies of target molecule to attain specific probability of detection. In this study, we compare the PLOD of four RT-qPCR assays (US CDC N1 and N2, China CDC N and ORF1ab) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 to that of ATOPlex sequencing by seeding known concentrations of gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2 into wastewater. Results suggest that among the RTqPCR assays, US CDC N1 was the most sensitive, especially at lower SARS-CoV-2 seed levels. However, when results from all RT-qPCR assays were combined, it resulted in greater detection rates than individual assays, suggesting that application of multiple assays is better suited for the trace detection of SARS-CoV-2 from wastewater samples. Furthermore, while ATOPlex offers a promising approach to SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance, this approach appears to be less sensitive compared to RT-qPCR under the experimental conditions of this study, and may require further refinements. Nonetheless, the combination of RT-qPCR and ATOPlex may be a powerful tool to simultaneously detect/quantify SARS-CoV-2 RNA and monitor emerging VOC in wastewater samples.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by direct RT-qPCR on nasopharyngeal specimens without extraction of viral RNA
    Hasan, Mohammad Rubayet
    Mirza, Faheem
    Al-Hail, Hamad
    Sundararaju, Sathyavathi
    Xaba, Thabisile
    Iqbal, Muhammad
    Alhussain, Hashim
    Yassine, Hadi Mohamad
    Perez-Lopez, Andres
    Tang, Patrick
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):
  • [22] Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification by RT-LAMP compared to RT-qPCR
    Minami, Kenta
    Masutani, Ryota
    Suzuki, Youichi
    Kubota, Meri
    Osaka, Naofumi
    Nakanishi, Toyofumi
    Nakano, Takashi
    Ukimura, Akira
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 27 (07) : 1068 - 1071
  • [23] Direct RT-qPCR Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Saliva Samples
    Tarantini, Francesco Saverio
    Wu, Siyu
    Jenkins, Harry
    Lopez, Ana Tellechea
    Tomlin, Hannah
    Hyde, Ralph
    Lis-Slimak, Katarzyna
    Thompson, Jamie Louise
    Pijuan-Galito, Sara
    Scales, Danielle
    Kaneko, Kazuyo
    Dey, Jayasree
    Park, Emily
    Hill, Jack
    Lee, I-Ning
    Doolan, Lara
    Arendt-Tranholm, Asta
    Denning, Chris
    Seedhouse, Claire
    Benest, Andrew, V
    METHODS AND PROTOCOLS, 2022, 5 (02)
  • [24] Rapid and Flexible RT-qPCR Surveillance Platforms To Detect SARS-CoV-2 Mutations
    Spiess, Katja
    Gunalan, Vithiagaran
    Marving, Ellinor
    Nielsen, Sofie Holdflod
    Jorgensen, Michelle G. P.
    Fomsgaard, Anna S.
    Nielsen, Line
    Alfaro-Nunez, Alonzo
    Karst, Soren M.
    Mortensen, Shila
    Rasmussen, Morten
    Lassauniere, Ria
    Rosenstierne, Maiken Worsoe
    Polacek, Charlotta
    Fonager, Jannik
    Cohen, Arieh S.
    Nielsen, Claus
    Fomsgaard, Anders
    Jacobs, Jonathan L.
    Bereguiain, Miguel Angel Garcia
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2023, 11 (01):
  • [25] An Open One-Step RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection
    Cerda, Ariel
    Rivera, Maira
    Armijo, Grace
    Ibarra-Henriquez, Catalina
    Reyes, Javiera
    Blazquez-Sanchez, Paula
    Aviles, Javiera
    Arce, Anibal
    Seguel, Aldo
    Brown, Alexander J.
    Vasquez, Yesseny
    Cortez-San Martin, Marcelo
    Cubillos, Francisco A.
    Garcia, Patricia
    Ferres, Marcela
    Ramirez-Sarmiento, Cesar A.
    Federici, Fernan
    Gutierrez, Rodrigo A.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [26] Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 indirect and direct RT-qPCR detection methods
    Pearson, Joel D.
    Trcka, Daniel
    Lu, Suying
    Hyduk, Sharon J.
    Jen, Mark
    Aynaud, Marie-Ming
    Hernandez, J. Javier
    Peidis, Philippos
    Barrios-Rodiles, Miriam
    Chan, Kin
    Woodgett, Jim
    Mazzulli, Tony
    Attisano, Liliana
    Pelletier, Laurence
    Cybulsky, Myron I.
    Wrana, Jeffrey L.
    Bremner, Rod
    VIROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [27] Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in tissue: the comparative roles of RT-qPCR, in situ RNA hybridization, and immunohistochemistry
    McHenry, Austin
    Iyer, Krishna
    Wang, Jianhi
    Liu, Chen
    Harigopal, Malini
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 22 (05) : 559 - 574
  • [28] The Inhibition and Variability of Two Different RT-qPCR Assays Used for Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater
    George Scott
    Nicholas Evens
    Jonathan Porter
    David I. Walker
    Food and Environmental Virology, 2023, 15 : 71 - 81
  • [29] RT-qPCR half-reaction optimization for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Wink, Priscila Lamb
    Volpato, Fabiana
    de Lima-Morales, Daiana
    Paiva, Rodrigo Minuto
    Willig, Julia Biz
    Bock, Hugo
    de Paris, Fernanda
    Barth, Afonso Luis
    REVISTA DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA TROPICAL, 2021, 54
  • [30] Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 indirect and direct RT-qPCR detection methods
    Joel D. Pearson
    Daniel Trcka
    Suying Lu
    Sharon J. Hyduk
    Mark Jen
    Marie-Ming Aynaud
    J. Javier Hernández
    Philippos Peidis
    Miriam Barrios-Rodiles
    Kin Chan
    Jim Woodgett
    Tony Mazzulli
    Liliana Attisano
    Laurence Pelletier
    Myron I. Cybulsky
    Jeffrey L. Wrana
    Rod Bremner
    Virology Journal, 18