RT-qPCR and ATOPlex sequencing for the sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA for wastewater surveillance

被引:15
|
作者
Ahmed, Warish [1 ]
Bivins, Aaron [2 ]
Metcalfe, Suzanne [1 ]
Smith, Wendy J. M. [1 ]
Ziels, Ryan [3 ]
Korajkic, Asja [4 ]
McMinn, Brian [4 ]
Graber, Tyson E. [5 ]
Simpson, Stuart L. [6 ]
机构
[1] Ecosci Precinct, CSIRO Land & Water, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Pk, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Civil Engn, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] united States Environm Protect Agcy, 26 W Martin Luther King Jr Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Eastern Ontario Res Inst, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada
[6] CSIRO Land & Water, Lucas Heights, NSW 2234, Australia
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Detection limit; Recovery; Concentration method; Enveloped virus; Wastewater; QUANTIFY;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2022.118621
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, wastewater surveillance has become an important tool for monitoring the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) within communities. In particular, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) has been used to detect and quantify SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater, while monitoring viral genome mutations requires separate approaches such as deep sequencing. A high throughput sequencing platform (ATOPlex) that uses a multiplex tiled PCR-based enrichment technique has shown promise in detecting variants of concern (VOC) while also providing virus quantitation data. However, detection sensitivities of both RT-qPCR and sequencing can be impacted through losses occurring during sample handling, virus concentration, nucleic acid extraction, and RT-qPCR. Therefore, process limit of detection (PLOD) assessments are required to estimate the gene copies of target molecule to attain specific probability of detection. In this study, we compare the PLOD of four RT-qPCR assays (US CDC N1 and N2, China CDC N and ORF1ab) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 to that of ATOPlex sequencing by seeding known concentrations of gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2 into wastewater. Results suggest that among the RTqPCR assays, US CDC N1 was the most sensitive, especially at lower SARS-CoV-2 seed levels. However, when results from all RT-qPCR assays were combined, it resulted in greater detection rates than individual assays, suggesting that application of multiple assays is better suited for the trace detection of SARS-CoV-2 from wastewater samples. Furthermore, while ATOPlex offers a promising approach to SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance, this approach appears to be less sensitive compared to RT-qPCR under the experimental conditions of this study, and may require further refinements. Nonetheless, the combination of RT-qPCR and ATOPlex may be a powerful tool to simultaneously detect/quantify SARS-CoV-2 RNA and monitor emerging VOC in wastewater samples.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by multiplex RT-qPCR
    Kudo, Eriko
    Israelow, Benjamin
    Vogels, Chantal B. F.
    Lu, Peiwen
    Wyllie, Anne L.
    Tokuyama, Maria
    Venkataraman, Arvind
    Brackney, Doug E.
    Ott, Isabel M.
    Petrone, Mary E.
    Earnest, Rebecca
    Lapidus, Sarah
    Muenker, M. Catherine
    Moore, Adam J.
    Casanovas-Massana, Arnau
    Omer, Saad B.
    Dela Cruz, Charles S.
    Farhadian, Shelli F.
    Ko, Albert I.
    Grubaugh, Nathan D.
    Iwasaki, Akiko
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2020, 18 (10)
  • [2] Comparison of RT-qPCR and RT-dPCR Platforms for the Trace Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater
    Ahmed, Warish
    Smith, Wendy J. M.
    Metcalfe, Suzanne
    Jackson, Greg
    Choi, Phil M.
    Morrison, Mary
    Field, Daniel
    Gyawali, Pradip
    Bivins, Aaron
    Bibby, Kyle
    Simpson, Stuart L.
    ACS ES&T WATER, 2022, : 1871 - 1880
  • [3] SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in Hospital Wastewater: CLEIA vs. RT-qPCR
    Thongpradit, Supranee
    Chanprasertyothin, Suwannee
    Pasomsub, Ekawat
    Ongphiphadhanakul, Boonsong
    Prasongtanakij, Somsak
    WATER, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [4] A sensitive and affordable multiplex RT-qPCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection
    Reijns, Martin A. M.
    Thompson, Louise
    Acosta, Juan Carlos
    Black, Holly A.
    Sanchez-Luque, Francisco J.
    Diamond, Austin
    Parry, David A.
    Daniels, Alison
    O'Shea, Marie
    Uggenti, Carolina
    Sanchez, Maria C.
    O'Callaghan, Alan
    McNab, Michelle L. L.
    Adamowicz, Martyna
    Friman, Elias T.
    Hurd, Toby
    Jarman, Edward J.
    Chee, Frederic Li Mow
    Rainger, Jacqueline K.
    Walker, Marion
    Drake, Camilla
    Longman, Dasa
    Mordstein, Christine
    Warlow, Sophie J.
    McKay, Stewart
    Slater, Louise
    Ansari, Morad
    Tomlinson, Ian P. M.
    Moore, David
    Wilkinson, Nadine
    Shepherd, Jill
    Templeton, Kate
    Johannessen, Ingolfur
    Tait-Burkard, Christine
    Haas, Jurgen G.
    Gilbert, Nick
    Adams, Ian R.
    Jackson, Andrew P.
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2020, 18 (12)
  • [5] A simple RNA preparation method for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR
    Aniela Wozniak
    Ariel Cerda
    Catalina Ibarra-Henríquez
    Valentina Sebastian
    Grace Armijo
    Liliana Lamig
    Carolina Miranda
    Marcela Lagos
    Sandra Solari
    Ana María Guzmán
    Teresa Quiroga
    Susan Hitschfeld
    Eleodoro Riveras
    Marcela Ferrés
    Rodrigo A. Gutiérrez
    Patricia García
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [6] A simple RNA preparation method for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR
    Wozniak, Aniela
    Cerda, Ariel
    Ibarra-Henriquez, Catalina
    Sebastian, Valentina
    Armijo, Grace
    Lamig, Liliana
    Miranda, Carolina
    Lagos, Marcela
    Solari, Sandra
    Maria Guzman, Ana
    Quiroga, Teresa
    Hitschfeld, Susan
    Riveras, Eleodoro
    Ferres, Marcela
    Gutierrez, Rodrigo A.
    Garcia, Patricia
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [7] Variability in RT-qPCR assay parameters indicates unreliable SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification for wastewater surveillance
    Bivins, Aaron
    Kaya, Devrim
    Bibby, Kyle
    Simpson, Stuart L.
    Bustin, Stephen A.
    Shanks, Orin C.
    Ahmed, Warish
    WATER RESEARCH, 2021, 203
  • [8] Capsid integrity RT-qPCR for the selective detection of intact SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater
    Canh, Vu Duc
    Torii, Shotaro
    Yasui, Midori
    Kyuwa, Shigeru
    Katayama, Hiroyuki
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 791
  • [9] Highly Sensitive Multiplex RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A and B Detection
    Li, J.
    Sun, Q.
    Pastor, L.
    Shen, S.
    Ni, R.
    Zhang, A.
    Sha, M.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 24 (10): : S57 - S57
  • [10] A simple, safe and sensitive method for SARS-CoV-2 inactivation and RNA extraction for RT-qPCR
    Kalnina, Lelde
    Mateu-Regue, Angels
    Oerum, Stephanie
    Hald, Annemette
    Gerstoft, Jan
    Oerum, Henrik
    Nielsen, Finn Cilius
    Iversen, Astrid K. N.
    APMIS, 2021, 129 (07) : 393 - 400