A conceptual model for the integration of social and ecological information to understand human-wildlife interactions

被引:124
|
作者
Lischka, Stacy A. [1 ,2 ]
Teel, Tara L. [3 ]
Johnson, Heather E. [4 ,7 ]
Reed, Sarah E. [2 ,5 ]
Breck, Stewart [6 ]
Carlos, Andrew Don [5 ]
Crooks, Kevin R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Pk & Wildlife, Res Policy & Planning Branch, 317 W Prospect Ave, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Human Dimens Nat Resources, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Colorado Pk & Wildlife, Res Policy & Planning Branch, 415 Turner Dr, Durango, CO 81301 USA
[5] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Amer Program, 2300 Southern Blvd, Bronx, NY 10460 USA
[6] USDA, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, Wildlife Serv, 4101 Laporte Ave, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA
[7] US Geol Survey, Alaska Sci Ctr, 410 Univ Dr, Anchorage, AK 99508 USA
关键词
Social-ecological systems; Black bears; Carnivores; Social science; Human-bear conflict; Colorado; BLACK BEARS; CONSERVATION; CONFLICT; PERCEPTIONS; SCIENCE; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.020
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
There is growing recognition that interdisciplinary approaches that account for both ecological and social processes are necessary to successfully address human-wildlife interactions. However, such approaches are hindered by challenges in aligning data types, communicating across disciplines, and applying social science information to conservation actions. To meet these challenges, we propose a conceptual model that adopts a social-ecological systems approach and integrates social and ecological theory to identify the multiple, nested levels of influence on both human and animal behavior. By accounting for a diverse array of influences and feedback mechanisms between social and ecological systems, this model fulfills a need for approaches that treat social and ecological processes with equal depth and facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the drivers of human and animal behaviors that perpetuate human-wildlife interactions. We apply this conceptual model to our work on human-black bear conflicts in Colorado, USA to demonstrate its utility. Using this example, we identify key lessons and offer guidance to researchers and conservation practitioners for applying integrated approaches to other human-wildlife systems.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 87
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating how varied human-wildlife interactions affect physical, mental, social, and spiritual health
    Chavez, Jose -Benito Rosales
    Larson, Kelli L.
    Guerrero, Jorge Morales
    Clark, Jeffrey A. G.
    SSM-QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN HEALTH, 2023, 4
  • [42] Responsibility, equity, justice, and inclusion in dynamic human-wildlife interactions
    Harris, Nyeema C.
    Wilkinson, Christine E.
    Fleury, Gabriela
    Nhleko, Zoliswa N.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 21 (08) : 380 - 387
  • [43] Using pastoral ideology to understand human-wildlife coexistence in arid agricultural landscapes
    Laverty, Theresa M.
    Teel, Tara L.
    Thomas, Rebecca E. W.
    Gawusab, A. Archie
    Berger, Joel
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2019, 1 (05)
  • [44] Human-Wildlife Interactions and Environmental Dynamics in the Okavango Delta, Botswana
    Yurco, Kayla
    King, Brian
    Young, Kenneth R.
    Crews, Kelley A.
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2017, 30 (09) : 1112 - 1126
  • [45] Without change there can be no progress: Implications for Human-Wildlife Interactions
    Messmer, Terry A.
    HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS, 2022, 16 (01): : 1 - 2
  • [46] Assessing and evaluating human-wildlife interactions for coexistence in shared landscapes
    Ferraz, Katia Maria Paschoaletto Micchi de Barros
    Bento, Isabella de Freitas
    Di Souza, Anna Beatriz Queiroz
    Nunes, Caio da Silveira
    Guimaraes, Maria Augusta de Mendonca
    Pereira, Monicque Silva
    da Silva, Livia Lima
    de Campos, Leticia Keiko Nunes
    Gobbi, Anita Seneme
    Alves, Jose Caio Quadrado
    Alvarez, Loisa Fabricia Prates
    Marchini, Silvio
    de Aquino, Ana Carla Medeiros Morato
    Sato, Vinicius Kenji de Moraes
    Paolino, Roberta Montanheiro
    FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2025, 5
  • [47] Individuals in focus: Individuals as the ecological and ethical center of human-wildlife conflict
    Orrick, Kaggie D.
    Ferraro, Kristy M.
    Sommer, Nathalie R.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2024, 294
  • [48] Human–nature relationships: An introduction to social–ecological practice theory for human–wildlife interactions
    Kaggie Orrick
    Michael Dove
    Oswald J. Schmitz
    Ambio, 2024, 53 (2) : 201 - 211
  • [49] Impact of individual demographic and social factors on human-wildlife interactions: a comparative study of three macaque species
    Balasubramaniam, Krishna N.
    Marty, Pascal R.
    Samartino, Shelby
    Sobrino, Alvaro
    Gill, Taniya
    Ismail, Mohammed
    Saha, Rajarshi
    Beisner, Brianne A.
    Kaburu, Stefano S. K.
    Bliss-Moreau, Eliza
    Arlet, Malgorzata E.
    Ruppert, Nadine
    Ismail, Ahmad
    Sah, Shahrul Anuar Mohd
    Mohan, Lalit
    Rattan, Sandeep K.
    Kodandaramaiah, Ullasa
    McCowan, Brenda
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [50] Using environmental education to nurture positive human-wildlife interactions in India
    Salazar, Gabby
    Satheesh, Nitya
    Ramakrishna, Ishika
    Monroe, Martha C.
    Mills, Morena
    Karanth, Krithi K.
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2024, 6 (03)