OpenKBP: The open-access knowledge-based planning grand challenge and dataset

被引:63
|
作者
Babier, Aaron [1 ]
Zhang, Binghao [1 ]
Mahmood, Rafid [1 ]
Moore, Kevin L. [2 ]
Purdie, Thomas G. [3 ,4 ]
McNiven, Andrea L. [3 ,4 ]
Chan, Timothy C. Y. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, 5 Kings Coll Rd, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiat Oncol, 3855 Hlth Sci Dr, La Jolla, CA 92104 USA
[3] UHN Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, 610 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Radiat Oncol, 148-150 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5S 3S2, Canada
[5] Techna Inst Adv Technol Hlth, 124-100 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5G 1P5, Canada
关键词
automated planning; computer vision; equity; diversity; and inclusion; knowledge-based planning; machine learning; public dataset; DOSE PREDICTION; AT-RISK; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/mp.14845
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To advance fair and consistent comparisons of dose prediction methods for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in radiation therapy research. Methods We hosted OpenKBP, a 2020 AAPM Grand Challenge, and challenged participants to develop the best method for predicting the dose of contoured computed tomography (CT) images. The models were evaluated according to two separate scores: (a) dose score, which evaluates the full three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions, and (b) dose-volume histogram (DVH) score, which evaluates a set DVH metrics. We used these scores to quantify the quality of the models based on their out-of-sample predictions. To develop and test their models, participants were given the data of 340 patients who were treated for head-and-neck cancer with radiation therapy. The data were partitioned into training (n=200), validation (n=40), and testing (n=100) datasets. All participants performed training and validation with the corresponding datasets during the first (validation) phase of the Challenge. In the second (testing) phase, the participants used their model on the testing data to quantify the out-of-sample performance, which was hidden from participants and used to determine the final competition ranking. Participants also responded to a survey to summarize their models. Results The Challenge attracted 195 participants from 28 countries, and 73 of those participants formed 44 teams in the validation phase, which received a total of 1750 submissions. The testing phase garnered submissions from 28 of those teams, which represents 28 unique prediction methods. On average, over the course of the validation phase, participants improved the dose and DVH scores of their models by a factor of 2.7 and 5.7, respectively. In the testing phase one model achieved the best dose score (2.429) and DVH score (1.478), which were both significantly better than the dose score (2.564) and the DVH score (1.529) that was achieved by the runner-up models. Lastly, many of the top performing teams reported that they used generalizable techniques (e.g., ensembles) to achieve higher performance than their competition. Conclusion OpenKBP is the first competition for knowledge-based planning research. The Challenge helped launch the first platform that enables researchers to compare KBP prediction methods fairly and consistently using a large open-source dataset and standardized metrics. OpenKBP has also democratized KBP research by making it accessible to everyone, which should help accelerate the progress of KBP research. The OpenKBP datasets are available publicly to help benchmark future KBP research.
引用
收藏
页码:5549 / 5561
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Knowledge-based proof planning
    Melis, E
    Siekmann, J
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1999, 115 (01) : 65 - 105
  • [23] KNOWLEDGE-BASED PRODUCTION PLANNING
    PANYR, J
    SCHUTT, D
    SIEMENS FORSCHUNGS-UND ENTWICKLUNGSBERICHTE-SIEMENS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT REPORTS, 1988, 17 (02): : 95 - 98
  • [24] Knowledge-based planning for meningioma
    Kopec, D.
    Zawadzka, A.
    Bodzak, D.
    Kukolowicz, P.
    Dyttus-Cebulok, K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1321 - S1322
  • [25] KNOWLEDGE-BASED PLANNING SYSTEM
    MORAD, AA
    BELIVEAU, YJ
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1991, 117 (01): : 1 - 12
  • [26] Developing an open-access knowledge exchange platform for breast surgeons
    Robinson, A.
    Reveendran, D.
    Oates, E.
    Shaheen, A.
    Bennett, J.
    Ng, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110
  • [27] SWELL: An open-access experimental dataset for arrays of wave energy conversion systems
    Faedo, Nicolas
    Pena-Sanchez, Yerai
    Pasta, Edoardo
    Papini, Guglielmo
    Mosquera, Facundo D.
    Ferri, Francesco
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 212 : 699 - 716
  • [28] An open-access dataset of emergency department admissions at a large teaching hospital in Iran
    Hassan, Zohreh Bani
    Kazemi, Mohammad Reza
    Jangi, Majid
    Tabesh, Hamed
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2024, 56
  • [29] An open-access dataset of naturalistic viewing using simultaneous EEG-fMRI
    Qawi K. Telesford
    Eduardo Gonzalez-Moreira
    Ting Xu
    Yiwen Tian
    Stanley J. Colcombe
    Jessica Cloud
    Brian E. Russ
    Arnaud Falchier
    Maximilian Nentwich
    Jens Madsen
    Lucas C. Parra
    Charles E. Schroeder
    Michael P. Milham
    Alexandre R. Franco
    Scientific Data, 10
  • [30] Open-Access Experiment Dataset for Fatigue Damage Accumulation and Life Prediction Models
    Hectors, Kris
    Vanspeybrouck, Dennis
    Plets, Jelle
    Bouckaert, Quinten
    De Waele, Wim
    METALS, 2023, 13 (03)