Preferences for Updates on General Research Results: A Survey of Participants in Genomic Research from Two Institutions

被引:3
|
作者
Taylor, Casey Overby [1 ,2 ]
Manov, Natalie Flaks [3 ]
Crew, Katherine D. [4 ]
Weng, Chunhua [5 ]
Connolly, John J. [6 ]
Chute, Christopher G. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Ford, Daniel E. [3 ]
Lehmann, Harold [10 ]
Rahm, Alanna Kulchak [11 ]
Kullo, Iftikhar J. [12 ]
Caraballo, Pedro J. [13 ]
Holm, Ingrid A. [14 ,15 ]
Mathews, Debra [16 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Inst Computat Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Med & Epidemiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[6] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Ctr Appl Genom, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[9] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[10] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Hlth Sci Informat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[11] Geisinger, Genom Med Inst, Danville, PA 17822 USA
[12] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[13] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[14] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Genet & Genom, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[15] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[16] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE | 2021年 / 11卷 / 05期
关键词
study participation; communication; survey; general research results; HEALTH RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS; BIOBANK PARTICIPANTS; PERSPECTIVES; RESPECT;
D O I
10.3390/jpm11050399
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
There is a need for multimodal strategies to keep research participants informed about study results. Our aim was to characterize preferences of genomic research participants from two institutions along four dimensions of general research result updates: content, timing, mechanism, and frequency. Methods: We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey that was administered from 25 June 2018 to 5 December 2018. Results: 397 participants completed the survey, most of whom (96%) expressed a desire to receive research updates. Preferences with high endorsement included: update content (brief descriptions of major findings, descriptions of purpose and goals, and educational material); update timing (when the research is completed, when findings are reviewed, when findings are published, and when the study status changes); update mechanism (email with updates, and email newsletter); and update frequency (every three months). Hierarchical cluster analyses based on the four update preferences identified four profiles of participants with similar preference patterns. Very few participants in the largest profile were comfortable with budgeting less money for research activities so that researchers have money to set up services to send research result updates to study participants. Conclusion: Future studies may benefit from exploring preferences for research result updates, as we have in our study. In addition, this work provides evidence of a need for funders to incentivize researchers to communicate results to participants.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey
    Paskins, Zoe
    Jinks, Clare
    Mahmood, Waheed
    Jayakumar, Prakash
    Sangan, Caroline B.
    Belcher, John
    Gwilym, Stephen
    ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2017, 12 (01)
  • [32] The utility of drug testing in epidemiological research: results from a general population survey
    Fendrich, M
    Johnson, TP
    Wislar, JS
    Hubbell', A
    Spiehler, V
    ADDICTION, 2004, 99 (02) : 197 - 208
  • [33] Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey
    Zoe Paskins
    Clare Jinks
    Waheed Mahmood
    Prakash Jayakumar
    Caroline B. Sangan
    John Belcher
    Stephen Gwilym
    Archives of Osteoporosis, 2017, 12
  • [34] Correction to: ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity
    Lex M. Bouter
    Joeri Tijdink
    Nils Axelsen
    Brian C. Martinson
    Gerben ter Riet
    Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4
  • [35] Attitudes of the general public towards the disclosure of individual research results and incidental findings from biobank genomic research in Australia
    Fleming, J.
    Critchley, C.
    Otlowski, M.
    Stewart, C.
    Kerridge, I.
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2015, 45 (12) : 1274 - 1279
  • [36] Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Perspectives from Managers of Two Distinct Research Biobanks
    Petersen, Gloria M.
    Van Ness, Brian
    JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2015, 43 (03): : 523 - 528
  • [37] Development of a Research Participants' Perception Survey to Improve Clinical Research
    Yessis, Jennifer L.
    Kost, Rhonda G.
    Lee, Laura M.
    Coller, Barry S.
    Henderson, David K.
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2012, 5 (06): : 452 - 460
  • [38] Return of individual genomic research results: what do consent forms tell participants?
    Stacey Pereira
    Jill Oliver Robinson
    Amy L McGuire
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2016, 24 : 1524 - 1529
  • [39] Return of individual genomic research results: what do consent forms tell participants?
    Pereira, Stacey
    Robinson, Jill Oliver
    McGuire, Amy L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2016, 24 (11) : 1524 - 1529
  • [40] Results of a Survey of Research Participants: What Constitutes a Concise Summary of Key Information
    Navratil, Judith
    Ansari, Nena A.
    DiVirgilio, Dana
    Schmidt, Karen
    Guido, Richard
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2020, 15 (03) : NP11 - NP12