Preferences for Updates on General Research Results: A Survey of Participants in Genomic Research from Two Institutions

被引:3
|
作者
Taylor, Casey Overby [1 ,2 ]
Manov, Natalie Flaks [3 ]
Crew, Katherine D. [4 ]
Weng, Chunhua [5 ]
Connolly, John J. [6 ]
Chute, Christopher G. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Ford, Daniel E. [3 ]
Lehmann, Harold [10 ]
Rahm, Alanna Kulchak [11 ]
Kullo, Iftikhar J. [12 ]
Caraballo, Pedro J. [13 ]
Holm, Ingrid A. [14 ,15 ]
Mathews, Debra [16 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Inst Computat Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Med & Epidemiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[6] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Ctr Appl Genom, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[9] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[10] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Hlth Sci Informat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[11] Geisinger, Genom Med Inst, Danville, PA 17822 USA
[12] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[13] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[14] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Genet & Genom, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[15] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[16] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE | 2021年 / 11卷 / 05期
关键词
study participation; communication; survey; general research results; HEALTH RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS; BIOBANK PARTICIPANTS; PERSPECTIVES; RESPECT;
D O I
10.3390/jpm11050399
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
There is a need for multimodal strategies to keep research participants informed about study results. Our aim was to characterize preferences of genomic research participants from two institutions along four dimensions of general research result updates: content, timing, mechanism, and frequency. Methods: We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey that was administered from 25 June 2018 to 5 December 2018. Results: 397 participants completed the survey, most of whom (96%) expressed a desire to receive research updates. Preferences with high endorsement included: update content (brief descriptions of major findings, descriptions of purpose and goals, and educational material); update timing (when the research is completed, when findings are reviewed, when findings are published, and when the study status changes); update mechanism (email with updates, and email newsletter); and update frequency (every three months). Hierarchical cluster analyses based on the four update preferences identified four profiles of participants with similar preference patterns. Very few participants in the largest profile were comfortable with budgeting less money for research activities so that researchers have money to set up services to send research result updates to study participants. Conclusion: Future studies may benefit from exploring preferences for research result updates, as we have in our study. In addition, this work provides evidence of a need for funders to incentivize researchers to communicate results to participants.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Do research participants share genomic screening results with family members?
    Wynn, Julia
    Milo Rasouly, Hila
    Vasquez-Loarte, Tania
    Saami, Akilan M.
    Weiss, Robyn
    Ziniel, Sonja I.
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    Wright Clayton, Ellen
    Christensen, Kurt D.
    Fasel, David
    Green, Robert C.
    Hain, Heather S.
    Harr, Margaret
    Hoell, Christin
    Kullo, Iftikhar J.
    Leppig, Kathleen A.
    Myers, Melanie F.
    Pacyna, Joel E.
    Perez, Emma F.
    Prows, Cynthia A.
    Kulchak Rahm, Alanna
    Campbell-Salome, Gemme
    Sharp, Richard R.
    Smith, Maureen E.
    Wiesner, Georgia L.
    Williams, Janet L.
    Blout Zawatsky, Carrie L.
    Gharavi, Ali G.
    Chung, Wendy K.
    Holm, Ingrid A.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2022, 31 (02) : 447 - 458
  • [22] Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey
    MacNeil, S. Danielle
    Fernandez, Conrad V.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2007, 33 (09) : 549 - 553
  • [23] Return of Genomic Results to Research Participants: The Floor, the Ceiling, and the Choices In Between
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    Amendola, Laura M.
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Brothers, Kyle
    Clayton, Ellen W.
    Chung, Wendy
    Evans, Barbara J.
    Evans, James P.
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Gallego, Carlos J.
    Garrison, Nanibaa' A.
    Gray, Stacy W.
    Holm, Ingrid A.
    Kullo, Iftikhar J.
    Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani
    McCarty, Cathy
    Prows, Cynthia A.
    Rehm, Heidi L.
    Sharp, Richard R.
    Salama, Joseph
    Sanderson, Saskia
    Van Driest, Sara L.
    Williams, Marc S.
    Wolf, Susan M.
    Wolf, Wendy A.
    Burke, Wylie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2014, 94 (06) : 818 - 826
  • [24] Participants' Preferences and Reasons for Wanting Feedback of Individual Genetic Research Results From an HIV-TB Genomic Study: A Case Study From Botswana
    Ralefala, Dimpho
    Kasule, Mary
    Matshabane, Olivia P.
    Wonkam, Ambroise
    Matshaba, Mogomotsi
    de Vries, Jantina
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2021, 16 (05) : 525 - 536
  • [25] Disseminating research results to research participants and their communities
    Mfutso-Bengo, Joseph
    Ndebele, Paul
    Masiye, Francis
    MALAWI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 20 (02) : 64 - 66
  • [26] Returning study results to research participants: Data access, format, and sharing preferences
    Mangal, Sabrina
    de Rivera, Stephanie Nino
    Choi, Jacky
    Turchioe, Meghan Reading
    Benda, Natalie
    Sharko, Marianne
    Myers, Annie
    Goyal, Parag
    Dugdale, Lydia
    Creber, Ruth Masterson
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 170
  • [27] Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity
    Lex M. Bouter
    Joeri Tijdink
    Nils Axelsen
    Brian C. Martinson
    Gerben ter Riet
    Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1 (1)
  • [28] Biobank Participants' Preferences for Disclosure of Genetic Research Results: Perspectives From the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity Project
    Allen, Nicole L.
    Karlson, Elizabeth W.
    Malspeis, Susan
    Lu, Bing
    Seidman, Christine E.
    Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2014, 89 (06) : 738 - 746
  • [29] Offering results to research participants
    Dinnett, EM
    Mungall, MMB
    Gordon, C
    Ronald, ES
    Gaw, A
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7540): : 549 - 550
  • [30] Public priorities for joint pain research: results from a general population survey
    Strauss, Vicky Y.
    Carter, Pam
    Ong, Bie Nio
    Bedson, John
    Jordan, Kelvin P.
    Jinks, Clare
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2012, 51 (11) : 2075 - 2082