Preferences for Updates on General Research Results: A Survey of Participants in Genomic Research from Two Institutions

被引:3
|
作者
Taylor, Casey Overby [1 ,2 ]
Manov, Natalie Flaks [3 ]
Crew, Katherine D. [4 ]
Weng, Chunhua [5 ]
Connolly, John J. [6 ]
Chute, Christopher G. [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Ford, Daniel E. [3 ]
Lehmann, Harold [10 ]
Rahm, Alanna Kulchak [11 ]
Kullo, Iftikhar J. [12 ]
Caraballo, Pedro J. [13 ]
Holm, Ingrid A. [14 ,15 ]
Mathews, Debra [16 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Inst Computat Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Med & Epidemiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[6] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Ctr Appl Genom, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[9] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[10] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Div Hlth Sci Informat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[11] Geisinger, Genom Med Inst, Danville, PA 17822 USA
[12] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[13] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[14] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Div Genet & Genom, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[15] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[16] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE | 2021年 / 11卷 / 05期
关键词
study participation; communication; survey; general research results; HEALTH RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS; BIOBANK PARTICIPANTS; PERSPECTIVES; RESPECT;
D O I
10.3390/jpm11050399
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
There is a need for multimodal strategies to keep research participants informed about study results. Our aim was to characterize preferences of genomic research participants from two institutions along four dimensions of general research result updates: content, timing, mechanism, and frequency. Methods: We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey that was administered from 25 June 2018 to 5 December 2018. Results: 397 participants completed the survey, most of whom (96%) expressed a desire to receive research updates. Preferences with high endorsement included: update content (brief descriptions of major findings, descriptions of purpose and goals, and educational material); update timing (when the research is completed, when findings are reviewed, when findings are published, and when the study status changes); update mechanism (email with updates, and email newsletter); and update frequency (every three months). Hierarchical cluster analyses based on the four update preferences identified four profiles of participants with similar preference patterns. Very few participants in the largest profile were comfortable with budgeting less money for research activities so that researchers have money to set up services to send research result updates to study participants. Conclusion: Future studies may benefit from exploring preferences for research result updates, as we have in our study. In addition, this work provides evidence of a need for funders to incentivize researchers to communicate results to participants.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research Participants' Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic Research
    Wynn, Julia
    Martinez, Josue
    Duong, Jimmy
    Chiuzan, Codruta
    Phelan, Jo C.
    Fyer, Abby
    Klitzman, Robert L.
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    Chung, Wendy K.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2017, 26 (04) : 841 - 851
  • [2] Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results
    Long, Christopher R.
    Stewart, M. Kathryn
    Cunningham, Thomas V.
    Warmack, T. Scott
    McElfish, Pearl A.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 13 (06) : 582 - 591
  • [3] Reporting genomic research results to population biobank participants - participant preferences and response
    Leitsalu, L.
    Alver, M.
    Palover, M.
    Reigo, A.
    Nikopensius, T.
    Alavere, H.
    Metspalu, A.
    Tonisson, N.
    Esko, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 26 : 805 - 806
  • [4] A survey of aortic disease biorepository participants' preferences for return of research genetic results
    Love-Nichols, Jamie
    Uhlmann, Wendy R.
    Arscott, Patricia
    Willer, Cristen
    Hornsby, Whitney
    Roberts, J. Scott
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2021, 30 (03) : 645 - 655
  • [5] Disclosing Results to Genomic Research Participants: Differences That Matter
    Blasimme, Alessandro
    Soulier, Alexandra
    Julia, Sophie
    Leonard, Samantha
    Cambon-Thomsen, Anne
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2012, 12 (10): : 20 - 22
  • [6] Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including after Participant Death: Empirical Results from a Cancer Biobank
    Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki
    Petersen, Gloria M.
    Wolf, Susan M.
    Chaffee, Kari G.
    Robinson, Marguerite E.
    Gordon, Deborah R.
    Lindor, Noralane M.
    Koenig, Barbara A.
    JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2015, 43 (03): : 464 - 475
  • [7] Research Participants' Preferences for Individual Results of Pharmacogenomics Research: A Case of a Ugandan HIV Research Institute
    Nabukenya, Sylvia
    Waitt, Catriona
    Senyonga, Ronald
    Castelnuovo, Barbara
    Munabi, Ian Guyton
    Kyaddondo, David
    Mwaka, Erisa S.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2023, 18 (04) : 218 - 232
  • [8] What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participants
    Fiona Alice Miller
    Robin Zoe Hayeems
    Jessica Peace Bytautas
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2010, 18 : 867 - 871
  • [9] What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participants
    Miller, Fiona Alice
    Hayeems, Robin Zoe
    Bytautas, Jessica Peace
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2010, 18 (08) : 867 - 871
  • [10] The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Brothers, Kyle B.
    Fitzgerald-Butt, Sara
    Garrison, Nanibaa' A.
    Jamal, Leila
    James, Cynthia A.
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    McCormick, Jennifer B.
    Nelson, Tanya N.
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    Rehm, Heidi L.
    Richer, Julie
    Souzeau, Emmanuelle
    Vassy, Jason L.
    Wagner, Jennifer K.
    Levy, Howard P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 104 (04) : 578 - 595