Kernel PCA-based GLRT for nonlinear fault detection of chemical processes

被引:74
|
作者
Mansouri, Majdi [2 ]
Nounou, Mohamed [1 ]
Nounou, Hazem [2 ]
Karim, Nazmul [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ QATAR, Chem Engn Program, Doha, Qatar
[2] Texas A&M Univ Qatar, Elect & Comp Engn Program, Doha, Qatar
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Chem Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
CSTR process; Nonlinear fault detection; Generalized likelihood ratio test; Kernel principal component analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2016.01.011
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Fault detection is often utilized for proper operation of chemical processes. In this paper, a nonlinear statistical fault detection using kernel principal component analysis (KPCA)-based generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT) is proposed. The objective of this work is to extend our previous work (Harrou et al. (2013) to achieve further improvements and widen the applicability of the developed method in practice by using the KPCA method. The KPCA presented here is derived from the nonlinear case of principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm and it is investigated here as modeling algorithm in the task of fault detection. The fault detection problem is addressed so that the data are first modeled using the KPCA algorithm and then the faults are detected using GLRT. The detection stage is related to the evaluation of detection indices, which are signals that reveal the fault presence. Those indices are obtained from the analysis of the difference between the process measurements and their estimations using the KPCA technique. The fault detection performance is illustrated through two simulated examples, one using synthetic data and the other using simulated continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR) data. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the KPCA-based GLRT method over the conventional KPCA method through its two charts T-2 and Q for detection of single as well as multiple sensor faults. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 347
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Process Monitoring Using Kernel PCA and Kernel Density Estimation-Based SSGLR Method for Nonlinear Fault Detection
    Shahzad, Faisal
    Huang, Zhensheng
    Memon, Waqar Hussain
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [42] Classification of gene expression data using PCA-based fault detection and identification
    Josserand, Timothy M.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON GENOMIC SIGNAL PROCESSING AND STATISTICS, 2008, : 72 - 75
  • [43] Learnable faster kernel-PCA for nonlinear fault detection: Deep autoencoder-based realization
    Ren, Zelin
    Jiang, Yuchen
    Yang, Xuebing
    Tang, Yongqiang
    Zhang, Wensheng
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION INTEGRATION, 2024, 40
  • [44] PCA-based fault diagnosis in the presence of control and dynamics
    Gertler, J
    Cao, J
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2004, 50 (02) : 388 - 402
  • [45] PCA-based fault isolation and prognosis with application to pump
    Halligan, Gary R.
    Jagannathan, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 55 (5-8): : 699 - 707
  • [46] PCA-based fault isolation and prognosis with application to pump
    Gary R. Halligan
    S. Jagannathan
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2011, 55 : 699 - 707
  • [47] Nonlinear fault detection of batch processes based on functional kernel locality preserving projections
    He, Fei
    Wang, Chaojun
    Fan, Shu-Kai S.
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2018, 183 : 79 - 89
  • [48] Structural damage detection based on variational mode decomposition and kernel PCA-based support vector machine
    Bisheh, Hossein Babajanian
    Amiri, Gholamreza Ghodrati
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 278
  • [49] PCA-Based Network Traffic Anomaly Detection
    Ding, Meimei
    Tian, Hui
    TSINGHUA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 21 (05) : 500 - 509
  • [50] Wind Turbine Fault Detection and Identification Through PCA-Based Optimal Variable Selection
    Wang, Yifei
    Ma, Xiandong
    Qian, Peng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2018, 9 (04) : 1627 - 1635