Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants

被引:51
|
作者
Bolstad, Kirsten [1 ]
Flatabo, Silje [1 ]
Aadnevik, Daniel [1 ]
Dalehaug, Ingvild [1 ]
Vetti, Nils [2 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Oncol & Med Phys, Bergen, Norway
[2] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Radiol, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Tomography; X-ray computed; metals; artifacts; algorithms; phantoms; diagnostic imaging; orthopedic fixation devices; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION-THERAPY;
D O I
10.1177/0284185117751278
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Metal implants may introduce severe artifacts in computed tomography (CT) images. Over the last few years dedicated algorithms have been developed in order to reduce metal artifacts in CT images. Purpose: To investigate and compare metal artifact reduction algorithms (MARs) from four different CT vendors when imaging three different orthopedic metal implants. Material and Methods: Three clinical metal implants were attached to the leg of an anthropomorphic phantom: cobalt-chrome; stainless steel; and titanium. Four commercial MARs were investigated: SmartMAR (GE); O-MAR (Philips); iMAR (Siemens); and SEMAR (Toshiba). The images were evaluated subjectively by three observers and analyzed objectively by calculating the fraction of pixels with CT number above 500 HU in a region of interest around the metal. The average CT number and image noise were also measured. Results: Both subjective evaluation and objective analysis showed that MARs reduced metal artifacts and improved the image quality for CT images containing metal implants of steel and cobalt-chrome. When using MARs on titanium, all MARs introduced new visible artifacts. Conclusion: The effect of MARs varied between CT vendors and different metal implants used in orthopedic surgery. Both in subjective evaluation and objective analysis the effect of applying MARs was most obvious on steel and cobalt-chrome implants when using SEMAR from Toshiba followed by SmartMAR from GE. However, MARs may also introduce new image artifacts especially when used on titanium implants. Therefore, it is important to reconstruct all CT images containing metal with and without MARs.
引用
收藏
页码:1110 / 1118
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Metal artifact reduction image reconstruction algorithm for CT of implanted metal orthopedic devices: a work in progress
    Patrick T. Liu
    William P. Pavlicek
    Mary B. Peter
    Mark J. Spangehl
    Catherine C. Roberts
    Robert G. Paden
    Skeletal Radiology, 2009, 38 : 797 - 802
  • [32] Quantitative evaluation of metal artifact reduction techniques
    Kolind, SH
    MacKay, AL
    Munk, PL
    Xiang, QS
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 20 (03) : 487 - 495
  • [33] A comparative study of 2D metal artifact reduction algorithms in medical CT
    Watzke, O
    Kachelriess, M
    Kalender, WA
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 313 - 313
  • [34] Metal artifact reduction for small metal implants on CT: Which image reconstruction algorithm performs better?
    Grandmougin, Aurelie
    Bakour, Omar
    Villani, Nicolas
    Baumann, Cedric
    Rousseau, Helene
    Teixeira, Pedro Augusto Gondim
    Blum, Alain
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 127
  • [35] Metal Artifact Reduction Software Must Be Used with Caution
    Wang, Yang
    Ma, Yi
    Zhu, Bin
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (02) : 687 - 687
  • [36] Influence of CT metal artifact reduction on SPECT/CT quantification of bone scintigraphy - Retrospective study for selected types of metal implants
    Kugler, Amelie
    Kuwert, Torsten
    Ritt, Philipp
    Grings, Andreas
    NUKLEARMEDIZIN-NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 61 (06): : 449 - 457
  • [37] Segmentation of artifacts and anatomy in CT metal artifact reduction
    Karimi, Seemeen
    Cosman, Pamela
    Wald, Christoph
    Martz, Harry
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (10) : 5857 - 5868
  • [38] A Constrained Optimization Algorithm for CT Metal Artifact Reduction
    Zhang, X.
    Wang, J.
    Xing, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [39] CT Metal Artifact Reduction by Soft Inequality Constraints
    Marina, Chukalina
    Dmitry, Nikolaev
    Valerii, Sokolov
    Anastasiya, Ingacheva
    Alexey, Buzmakov
    Victor, Prun
    EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE VISION (ICMV 2015), 2015, 9875
  • [40] Assessment of metal artifact reduction methods in pelvic CT
    Abdoli, Mehrsima
    Mehranian, Abolfazl
    Ailianou, Angeliki
    Becker, Minerva
    Zaidi, Habib
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (04) : 1588 - 1597