Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants

被引:52
|
作者
Bolstad, Kirsten [1 ]
Flatabo, Silje [1 ]
Aadnevik, Daniel [1 ]
Dalehaug, Ingvild [1 ]
Vetti, Nils [2 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Oncol & Med Phys, Bergen, Norway
[2] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Radiol, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Tomography; X-ray computed; metals; artifacts; algorithms; phantoms; diagnostic imaging; orthopedic fixation devices; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION-THERAPY;
D O I
10.1177/0284185117751278
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Metal implants may introduce severe artifacts in computed tomography (CT) images. Over the last few years dedicated algorithms have been developed in order to reduce metal artifacts in CT images. Purpose: To investigate and compare metal artifact reduction algorithms (MARs) from four different CT vendors when imaging three different orthopedic metal implants. Material and Methods: Three clinical metal implants were attached to the leg of an anthropomorphic phantom: cobalt-chrome; stainless steel; and titanium. Four commercial MARs were investigated: SmartMAR (GE); O-MAR (Philips); iMAR (Siemens); and SEMAR (Toshiba). The images were evaluated subjectively by three observers and analyzed objectively by calculating the fraction of pixels with CT number above 500 HU in a region of interest around the metal. The average CT number and image noise were also measured. Results: Both subjective evaluation and objective analysis showed that MARs reduced metal artifacts and improved the image quality for CT images containing metal implants of steel and cobalt-chrome. When using MARs on titanium, all MARs introduced new visible artifacts. Conclusion: The effect of MARs varied between CT vendors and different metal implants used in orthopedic surgery. Both in subjective evaluation and objective analysis the effect of applying MARs was most obvious on steel and cobalt-chrome implants when using SEMAR from Toshiba followed by SmartMAR from GE. However, MARs may also introduce new image artifacts especially when used on titanium implants. Therefore, it is important to reconstruct all CT images containing metal with and without MARs.
引用
收藏
页码:1110 / 1118
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimization of Monoenergetic Extrapolations in Dual-Energy CT for Metal Artifact Reduction in Different Body Regions and Orthopedic Implants
    Horat, Lukas
    Hamie, Mustafa Q.
    Huber, Florian A.
    Guggenberger, Roman
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (05) : E67 - E74
  • [22] Iterative algorithms for metal artifact reduction in children with orthopedic prostheses: preliminary results
    Toso, Seema
    Laurent, Meryle
    Lozeron, Elise Dupuis
    Brindel, Pauline
    Lacalamita, Marirosa Cristallo
    Hanquinet, Sylviane
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 48 (13) : 1884 - 1890
  • [23] Iterative algorithms for metal artifact reduction in children with orthopedic prostheses: preliminary results
    Seema Toso
    Meryle Laurent
    Elise Dupuis Lozeron
    Pauline Brindel
    Marirosa Cristallo Lacalamita
    Sylviane Hanquinet
    Pediatric Radiology, 2018, 48 : 1884 - 1890
  • [24] Metal Artifact Reduction in Photon-Counting Detector CT Quantitative Evaluation of Artifact Reduction Techniques
    Skornitzke, Stephan
    Mergen, Victor
    Biederer, Juergen
    Alkadhi, Hatem
    Do, Thuy D.
    Stiller, Wolfram
    Frauenfelder, Thomas
    Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
    Euler, Andre
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2024, 59 (06) : 442 - 449
  • [25] Iterative deblurring for CT metal artifact reduction
    Wang, G
    Snyder, DL
    OSullivan, JA
    Vannier, MW
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1996, 15 (05) : 657 - 664
  • [26] Metal Artifact Reduction for Orthopedic Implants (O-MAR): Usefulness in CT Evaluation of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Shim, Euddeum
    Kang, Yusuhn
    Ahn, Joong Mo
    Lee, Eugene
    Lee, Joon Woo
    Oh, Joo Han
    Kang, Heung Sik
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (04) : 860 - 866
  • [27] Evaluation of a metal artifact reduction algorithm for radiotherapy CT scans
    Rechner, L.
    Kovacs, D.
    Bangsgaard, A.
    Berthelsen, A.
    Aznar, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S442 - S443
  • [28] Iterative metal artifact reduction improves dose calculation accuracy Phantom study with dental implants
    Maerz, Manuel
    Mittermair, Pia
    Krauss, Andreas
    Koelbl, Oliver
    Dobler, Barbara
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2016, 192 (06) : 403 - 413
  • [29] Investigation of the effectiveness of eight different metal artifact reduction algorithms in reducing extracorporeal metal artifacts: a phantom study using the Gumbel method
    Suzuki, Keiko
    Muto, Hiroe
    POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 30 (04): : 189 - 196
  • [30] Metal Artifact Reduction in CT: Where Are We After Four Decades?
    Gjesteby, Lars
    De Man, Bruno
    Jin, Yannan
    Paganetti, Harald
    Verburg, Joost
    Giantsoudi, Drosoula
    Wang, Ge
    IEEE ACCESS, 2016, 4 : 5826 - 5849